Posted on 04/11/2016 12:54:52 PM PDT by Kaslin
The Associated Press is out with new polling pitting Democrat Hillary Clinton against Republican Donald Trump. Clinton beats Trump in every category among the general electorate, including on the questions of who is best to create jobs, who is better on international trade and who can "Make America Great Again," which of course is Trump's campaign slogan.
First, the criteria:
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
Benjamin Disraeli
So I assume that the next time Trump starts talking about the latest poll that shows him winning by a YUUUGE amount, you will be telling all the Trump supporters to ignore it as unreliable?
This far out, polls for the general mean less than nothing. Carter was beating Reagan for months, but look who won. LOL
Unlike you, I have seen Hillary "debate" ( her way !) Rick Lazio and destroy him, during the run for the N.Y. Senate seat. Lazio was youngish, a far better debater than Cruz is, but he too used lawyerly methods. Unlike Cruz, he could and did think on his feet, but she still destroyed him!
When Hillary slightly went after Trump, he shut her up with one short sentence! He knows exactly how and with what to get to her, shut her up, and bring her down. He knows all about her, which gives him a leg up and he does VERY well talking off the cuff.
None of these polls with Hillary V Trump or any other GOP candidate never give details of where and whom they call; there aren't ever any breakdowns. So they and YOU are basing their findings on worthless info.
-Dump Trump-
I have been a software engineer for the financial services industry for over 30 years. I do have done a lot of work on statistical models for pricing different types assets and risk analysis. It's very easy to make a statistical case for anything you want to assert.
The fact is, Cruz or Ryan or whomever the GOPE has now decided they want to throw under the bus, will lose in a monumental landslide, to the Dem candidate.
“When you need to default to ad hominem to make a point the point is not worth making.”
It isn’t my default... your logic was just bad enough to merit it, and the behavior of the Trump chumps has been nasty enough to remove my filter that would normally prevent it.
Pavlich and a host of others should just go ahead and start Neo-Cons for Hillary. They and their open-borders toadies are democrats anyway, so that is why they would rather see Hillary win instead of Trump.
LOL! ANOTHER ad hominem. Double down. Cute.
Normally it’s considered bad form to automatically discount the writer.
Pavlich is a universal exception to the rule.
*rme* you would vote for her, there is no doubt in my mind
Isn’t that what the rats do? They can not win an honest election.
Even ping-pong?
Even ping-pong. But not lawn darts. Hildebeast is scared of lawn darts.
Prove it was an online poll, show me the link.
Bump
>>*rme* you would vote for her, there is no doubt in my mind
Burn, baby, burn!!
“LOL! ANOTHER ad hominem. Double down. Cute.”
Fail. Stating that your logic was poor is not an ad hominem. The rock/paper/scissors point still stands, and you still want to avoid it.
Yeah but the DNC has unfairly given her all those extra super delegates while they gave Bernie Sanders only a few.
they need to
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.