Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUmmie FUnnies 07-21-06 (Another Daily Kos Blogola Scandal)
DUmmie FUnnies ^ | July 21, 2006 | KOmmies and PJ-Comix

Posted on 07/21/2006 6:17:14 AM PDT by PJ-Comix

Take a look at the photo of Congressperson Cynthia McKinney above. Obviously the source of that picture must be some vicious hate-filled right-wing website that dislikes the "progressive" policies of Ms Mckinney, right? Wrong. The source for that picture is none other than the Daily Kos. You read that correctly. This picture is part of an ad by McKinney's primary opponent, Hank Johnson, that is figured PROMINENTLY at the top of the list of Daily Kos advertisers. I should have had a hint of this latest Kos Blogola scandal yesterday when I did a search on the Daily Kos site to see what the Head KOmmie, KOs himself, had to say about allegations of vote fraud in that election. Surprisingly I found NO COMMENT from him. And this morning I found out why. You might not be able to buy Kos's support with Blogola payments via advertising or the Unknown Jerome "consulting" fees but at least you can buy Kos's silence which is just as important. Poor Joe Lieberman. Had he only paid big bucks for a Daily Kos ad months ago, he could have spared himself the agony of a close race with Kos-supported Ned Lamont. Of course, the KOmmies themselves enthusiastically support the leftwing wacko McKinney which makes that anti-McKinney ad in KOmmieland so painful for them as you can see in this KOmmie THREAD titled, "Will Diebold Some Day Advertise on DailyKos?" So let us now watch the ENRAGED KOmmies attack their Head KOmmie for accepting Blogola money in the form of advertising in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, thinking that Cynthia actually looks cute with that red slash across her face, is in the [brackets]:

Will Diebold Some Day Advertise on DailyKos?

[Maybe President Bush should buy a Kos ad.]

Since Cynthia McKinney's strong opposition to President Bush has given her national notoriety, the Republican machine in Georgia has put extra effort into unseating her. Her district is heavily black and Democratic-leaning, so this has in practice meant running a conservative in the Democratic primary and encouraging Republicans to cross over in the open primary system.

This year the open primary used Diebold voting machines. It's likely that Cynthia was a victim of Diebold fraud. She now faces a run-off with Hank Johnson, who has piles of advertising money from Republican donors. To read about the fraud, see: http://cynthiaforcongress.com/...

WHY IS KOS ALLOWING ADVERTISING FOR HER OPPONENT, a Republican stooge, Hank Johnson? This is a guy that Diebold could really get behind. Why is Kos behind it too? I really hope it's just laziness.

[It's a lazy way to earn some easy Blogola Bucks.]

Cynthia McKinney is a progressive in every sense of the word. She was one of our first and only congresspeople to speak out against Bush's manipulation of the events of 9/11 for political gain, and it almost cost her her political life. She has also been more active than almost any other Democratic politician in uncovering voter fraud in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections.

[Too bad she was too cheap to shell out some Blogola Bucks in the form of an ad in KOmmieland. I guess she wrongly assumed that Kos would support her without a payoff.]

I have no connection with Cynthia Kinney's campaign, or any other. I don't work in politics. I'm just a concerned citizen. And seeing that ad makes me never want to visit this site again. If you feel the same way, reccomend this diary, so Kos and other site administrators can read this.

[Seeing that anti-McKinney ad makes me want to visit KOmmieland again and again. Ironically, the anti-McKinney ad is RIGHT NEXT to your griping about that ad. And now to read your fellow KOmmies agonizing over this latest KOs Blogola scandal...]

Are you aware that during the Cultural Revolution in Maoist China educators, professionals, and officials targeted by the mobs were forces to stand on chairs wearing placards with their names crossed out - confess their sins before the raving crowd - have things thrown at them - before they were murdered? I find the ad offensive whoever the target. But, you are right. McKinney has done so a whole lot for the progressive cause and has dared to ask unpopular, but necessary questions. It is a barometer of the future direction of this site.

[And now Cynthia McKinney must stand on a chair wearing a placard with her picture crossed out and confess before a raving crowd that she was too cheap to shell out Blogola ad payments to the Almighty KOs.]

Ad's Phrasing Looks Like A Statement of Community.Ban McKinney, she will "discredit our cause" - many people visiting the site will not completley understand that that is "just an ad", I'm sure. Whether people want to address that supposed "ignorance" or not, is another issue. However, the ad's graphic image is offensive enough that with that text, it brands the site in a very particular context that is not good for Democrats and not good for DK.

[Visitors to KOmmieland will understand that Blogola is involved.]

I have not figured out what this woman has done that has generated this kind of hostility among progressives. . .Leiberman, that's clear. But Kinney, all people write about is that she's "strident". Maybe she is, but where? when? what? who? And the stuff with that police officer. . .When a grand jury REFUSED to indict her, which makes her less indictable than a ham sandwich. . . the house "ethics committee" was going to investigate her?? Can you say railroaded? And the only thing substantive I know about her is that she asked THE question. Is there any thing I'm missing?

[Yes. You are missing the big Blogola Bucks that the Head KOmmie, KOs, earned from that ad.]

She's guilty of being an assertive black woman. That makes white conservatives and white pseudo-liberals very nervous.

[And yet she is ATTACKED on a "progressive" blog. Sorry, but EVIL conservatives are NOT responsible for that ad.]

I mean, I know you. You're not someone to throw things like that around lightly. From everything I've learned about this women she's way out in tin-hat country. I don't care if she's black and asseritive, I do care that it sounds like she has aa few screws lose.

[ONLY a few?]

Markos has bills to pay. He pays them through ads. I don't believe he filters his ads, although I don't know. Let's say Karl Rove wants to pay the programmers' and hosters' rent, and Markos' mortgage with ads here for disgusting neocon candidates, why is that a problem? Do you think anyone here is going to be politically converted by the ads? Do you think the coverage is going to become muted if they do? Is taking money from someone an endorsement of them??? In fact, it's a way of taking money away from them and putting it to better use. Go to the ads thing and see how easy it is to buy one. And please go ahead and buy one. We'll all be very grateful you did, but if you spout bullshit, we'll still peel your face off verbally and wipe our asses with it.

[MarKOS has bills to pay. So just shell out the Blogola Bucks to him in the form of ads. It might not buy his outright support but at least it will keep him from supporting your political opponent. Joe Lieberman should have learned that lesson months ago.]

That advert is highly offensive. It should be removed, immediately.

[I say KEEP the ad. It is like an advertisement that KOs accepts Blogola payoffs.]

Ads Message: 'Ban McKinney - She Discredits Us'. That's not a welcoming message, nor is it particularly encouraging of free speech within our community or the democratic party. And given her status as one of very few African American representatives, the imagery is quite shocking, particularly to people sensitive to issues related to race or bias. Serving such an Ad here, on the front page, at the top of the page, can only serve the enemies of the Democratic party, not Democrats, nor even liberal or progressive Democrats. It's extremely offensive and divisive imagery.

[Which is why it is being featured in this edition of the DUmmie FUnnies. The source of that ad pic is the "progressive" Daily Kos itself.]

That image is burned in my brain already. That ad is extremely divisive. Being subjected to it nonstop while browsing is extremely distracting and sickening.

[That ad image has been seared, SEARED into my brain. It happened on Christmas 1968 when President Nixon sent me into Cambodia.]

This is an outrage and disgrace. Protests to Kos should ensue.

[Ah! More DUFU material!]


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: 2006election; adola; blogola; cynthiamckinney; dailykos; election2006; kommies; kosmosexualagenda; manpurse; payoff; payola; rattricks; smearcampaign; thisspaceforrent
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: bcsco
"Kinney"...

"Did somebody call me?"

61 posted on 07/21/2006 3:32:42 PM PDT by Purrcival (Hey, let's keep McKinney in the 4th district, so she can keep being an EMBARRASSMENT to the Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
That's not a welcoming message, nor is it particularly encouraging of free speech within our community or the democratic party.

SOOOOOOOOOO, saying something against McKinney is NOT encouraging free speech.....

Ok, whatever you say.....

62 posted on 07/21/2006 3:34:50 PM PDT by dirtbiker (I've tried to see the liberal point of view, but I couldn't get my head that far up my a$$....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

You are eventually going to get me to buy an iPod, darn it!!!


63 posted on 07/21/2006 3:37:56 PM PDT by Purrcival (Hey, let's keep McKinney in the 4th district, so she can keep being an EMBARRASSMENT to the Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival

Yuck!

Just had Fox with Brian Wilson on while we were cleaning up after dinner. He announced that 'Not so [s]Kinney McKinney' has been a no show on the House floor for most of the week, missing 19 votes. How's that going to play once her opposition gets hold of it? And I wonder how the KOs Kidddies would spin it?


64 posted on 07/21/2006 3:42:36 PM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival
"You are eventually going to get me to buy an iPod, darn it!!!"

Don't bother. I did and hardly ever use it. And PJ claims we won't need one for his podcast.

Another thing about ITunes for the IPod, the music format can't be conveniently burned to a listen-able CD. If you do a direct burn, the CD won't play in your car or home stereo. You have to get conversion software that converts the ITune file format to a WAV or MP3 format first. Then THAT file can be burned.

65 posted on 07/21/2006 3:47:24 PM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw; PJ-Comix
Georgia has an open primary. Republicans can vote in the Democratic primary, and vice versa (but it's one or the other, not both). McKinney's 4th district is predominantly African-American, and Republicans stand a snowball's chance in Hell of winning. In 2002, Republicans in Georgia's 4th District were so sick of McKinney's shenanigans that they crossed over and voted for her opponent, Denise Majette, in the Democratic primary. Majette won, and went on to win the seat. But in 2004, Majette decided that she wanted to run for Senate, and that left the 4th District seat open for McKinney again.

I'm in Georgia's 11th District (Rep. Phil Gingrey-R), so I can't vote against her. But Neal Boortz has an interesting take on the whole situation. He used to be firmly in the camp that wanted to send McKinney's worthless butt packing. But after returning from a recent trip to D.C., he has changed his mind. The reason? He said that when he was in D.C., he discovered that Democrats there were secretly HAPPY that McKinney had been forced into a runoff, and that they hoped she would LOSE. This included members of the Congressional Black Caucus. Why? Because 1) she's an embarrassment, 2) she would be replaced by another Democrat 3) who is also black, 4) and would vote solidly with their bloc, 5) and would actually be EFFECTIVE (Hank Johnson). Boortz also found out that Republicans wanted her to REMAIN in office so they could continue to point to her as "the face of the Democratic Party".

Hey, that works for me.
66 posted on 07/21/2006 3:49:49 PM PDT by Purrcival (Hey, let's keep McKinney in the 4th district, so she can keep being an EMBARRASSMENT to the Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Funny that she also missed the debate before the primary. What is she doing all day?

I would never support a candidate who refused to debate. Funny the KOmmie Kids don't mention that might have been a factor.

67 posted on 07/21/2006 3:54:22 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival
" Hey, that works for me."

Mee too...or is that two?

68 posted on 07/21/2006 3:56:11 PM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; PJ-Comix; franksolich
'Not so [s]Kinney McKinney' is also failing to respond to requests for interviews from local news services in Atlanta:

http://www.11alive.com/help/search/search_article.aspx?storyid=82220

She is keeping a very low profile. She also refused to debate her opponents, pre-primary. This is one arrogant broad.

Cynthia McKinney, celebrating her primary "victory" a little too early

69 posted on 07/21/2006 3:58:05 PM PDT by Purrcival (Hey, let's keep McKinney in the 4th district, so she can keep being an EMBARRASSMENT to the Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
"Funny the KOmmie Kids don't mention that might have been a factor."

I'm sure it was a factor, along with her posturing and attitude. But I doubt the KOs Kiddies would mention anything about that. They're all sweetness and light when it comes to someone they think is on their side. There's no room for evaluation. That takes effort and may also show their emotional attachments are invalid. We can't have that now, can we?

70 posted on 07/21/2006 3:59:58 PM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival
" She is keeping a very low profile. She also refused to debate her opponents, pre-primary. This is one arrogant broad."

Is there a Bukowski's in her district? Did she run into the Pittster?

71 posted on 07/21/2006 4:02:02 PM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RedRover; bcsco; franksolich

She didn't show up at ANY of the pre-primary debates. She didn't even bother to RESPOND, one way or the other, to the invitations. It was funny watching those debates on the local channels and seeing an empty podium where McKinney was supposed to be standing.

Can you imagine the ARROGANCE? She couldn't even be bothered to respond one way or the other to the invitations, not even to say that she had a schedule conflict...IF she had a schedule conflict, which is doubtful.


72 posted on 07/21/2006 4:04:00 PM PDT by Purrcival (Hey, let's keep McKinney in the 4th district, so she can keep being an EMBARRASSMENT to the Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival

The reports I heard indicated she didn't want to be questioned on her run-in with the Capitol Hill Police. That may be, but it also shows an arrogant disregard for her constituency not to mention her opponents.

And now, apparently, she isn't even responding to news media attention. Methinks there's something in play here more than a bruised ego. Does she have stability problems, perhaps?


73 posted on 07/21/2006 4:08:10 PM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival

The news report claims there's only 3 weeks before the run-off election. If she wants to keep her seat (no...don't go there) she'd better get her face (let's not go their either) before the cameras and her constituents soon.

I think her opponent smells blood. Boy, am I divided. One side of me wants to see her lose (or is it loose) so bad, but the other side wants her to remain as a poster child for Democratic lunacy. Which way to go...which way to go...BWAAAAAAAHHHAAAAAA!!!!


74 posted on 07/21/2006 4:16:03 PM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Does she have stability problems, perhaps?

Yes, her sense of absolute entitlement (fueled by dopes like the KOmmie KOoks) has unbalanced whatever brain she started out with.

75 posted on 07/21/2006 4:28:54 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: RedRover

I just wonder if it doesn't go farther than that. She certainly has emotional problems based on her low threshhold to anger. There may be more at play than we are aware of.

But would her sense of entitlement simply cause her to withdraw from social contact because of the injury to it from this forced run-off? Good questions.


76 posted on 07/21/2006 4:34:52 PM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

I've got a tatoo on my arm that says, "Born to Loose".


77 posted on 07/21/2006 4:35:28 PM PDT by RedRover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: RedRover
"I've got a tatoo on my arm that says, "Born to Loose"."

Drop one 'o' and it'd fit her perfectly!

78 posted on 07/21/2006 4:38:45 PM PDT by bcsco ("He who is wedded to the spirit of the age is soon a widower" – Anonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival
Republicans wanted her to REMAIN in office so they could continue to point to her as "the face of the Democratic Party". Hey, that works for me.

My friend, that works for me, too!

79 posted on 07/21/2006 4:49:18 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: RedRover; bcsco; PJ-Comix

Her sense of entitlement is also fueled by her daddy, Billy McKinney, who was a fixture in Georgia politics for many years:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynthia_McKinney

"Her political career began in 1986 when her father, Billy McKinney, a representative in the Georgia House of Representatives, submitted his daughter's name as a write-in candidate for the Georgia state house. She received about 40 percent of the popular vote despite the fact that she lived in Jamaica at the time with then-husband Coy Grandison (with whom she had a son, Coy McKinney, now age 16). In 1988, McKinney ran for the same seat and won, making the McKinneys the first father and daughter to simultaneously serve in the Georgia state house."

More about Daddy McKinney:

http://www.11alive.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=43301

More Cynthia McKinney info:

http://www.atljewishtimes.com/archives/1999/110599cs.htm


80 posted on 07/21/2006 4:54:49 PM PDT by Purrcival (Hey, let's keep McKinney in the 4th district, so she can keep being an EMBARRASSMENT to the Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson