Posted on 12/01/2008 4:50:46 PM PST by Polarik
MEDIA ALERT!
Lan Lamphere has invited me to be his guest tonight on his OVERNIGHT AM show. It starts at 10pm EST. Please listen in, and also visit his website, http://www.lanlamphere.com/public/,where you can listen, and also send email messages. It would be nice if FReepers would make their voices heard and support one of their own.
MEDIA ALERT! Also today, I got a call from Bob Unruh of World Net Daily, who is doing a story on my COLB research! FINALLY....after four months in trying to get their attention, they've sat up and taken notice. Look for his tory in tomorrow's edition of WND.com.
I have some important new information to disclose, along with making some corrections and clarifications to my final report on Obama's bogus birth certificate. I recently received a real 2006 COLB scan image and another real 2008 COLB scan image from a contact who lives in Honolulu. As with Michele's real 2008 COLB, and Dan's real 2007 COLB, the personal information on these two new additions has also been redacted.
These additional COLB scans provide more indight into the document certification practices used by Hawaii's Vital Records. They also require me to make a point of clarification as to the observations I made. I am going to present them as if they were FAQ, or Frequently Asked Questions, about the COLB forms. Some of them really are FAQ, so the use of this Socratic method is actually quite appropriate.
A true scientist is not afraid or recalcitrant to modify his hypotheses and conclusions as more facts are uncovered, and by the very fact that I am acknowledging them to the public, and disclosing the priviledged information that requires this action, I am demonstrating my fidelity to conducting honest research.
Does Hawaii "change their borders every year?"
The short answer is, "No," and here's why. After Obama bastardized the word, "Change," I should have used a more fitting word, like "alternate" or "modify." My efforts to obtain high quality copies of real COLBs produced in each of the eight years since this form's inception in November 2001, has been harder than trying to find that proverbial needle in the haystack. The 2006 COLB was not exaclty what I expected it to be., but, in reality, it actually confirmed an earlier theory I had that the borders were not modified every year, but every other year. I often go on my gut instincts, but they are not something that can be experimentally qualified.
In my report, I said that "The COLB borders are changed from year to year as a way to distinguish them from other genuine COLBS, and from fraudulent COLBs whose date stamp (and other year-relevant information) does not corresponds to the border used that year." As it turns out, Hawaii does modify the borders to thwart would-be forgers, but they do it every two years rather than every year. When the new COLB form was literally drawn for the first time in November 2001, it seems logical that Hawaii might, with only two months left in 2001, carry over that new border design to the following year, which was 2002. For 2003, it appears that Hawaii carried the pattern over to 2003 COLBs.
Although I now have COLB examples for the years, 2002, 2003, 2006, 2007, and 2008, I cannot say, with 100% certainty that the borders in 2004 are different from the previous pattern, and that the 2004 pattern was also carried over to 2005, but given that both the 2006 and 2007 COLBs have the same border, it makes sense that the 2008 border is different from the previous two. Although it would be helpful to have the three missing COLBs to complete my collection, I can imagine that when Hawaii created a new border pattern, they used it for two successive years before they switched to another pattern.
Here is the 2006 COLB (NOTE: the owner did the redacting, not me):
Now that we know the 2006 and 2007 borders had the same pattern, and that the 2008 border pattern was modified, it is logical to assume that the borders for 2004 and 2005 have the same pattern, but are different from either the 2006-2007 COLBs and the 2002-2003 COLBs. Then, when we look at the border of the bogus Obama 2007 COLB images, we can see that while they seem similar to the 2006-2007 borders, they also look different from them.
For comparison purposes, the Factcheck border corner is shown on the left and since it came from an alleged 2007 COLB, it should have a border that looks just like a 2007 border. However, now that I see the actual 2006 border, it looks more like the 2006 border than the 2007 one. Regardless of which year it is, I said in my final report, that this border was copied from another image, and overlayed on top of an existing background image. The telltale signs of this "Photoshopping" was the more transparent border than the real ones, and the less defined pattern. The resolution of this border is much lower than the surrounding background. In other words, the border is lower in quality than the background it rests upon.
Has Hawaii "modified their embossed Seals from year to year?"
The answer to this question will surprise you as it did me. As you may recall from my report, I demonstrated that the Seal on the real 2007 COLB looks entirely different from the Seal on the real COLB, and that the Seal on Obama's bogus 2007 COLB looks identical to the 2008 Seal. Well, now, what about that real 2006 COLB I received? What does its Seal look like? Just like the 2008 Seal!
Now, if you go back to the Seals on the 2002-2003 COLBs, they look identical to the Seal used on the 2007 COLB, but not the 2006 COLB or the 2008 COLB. To put it simply, the Seal used on all, real 2007 COLBs looks nothing like the Seals used the year before, or the year after. Yet, it does look like what was used for 2002 and 2003.
OK, one more time.
Here is the Seal used on a real 2008 COLB:
Here is the Seal used on a real 2006 COLB:
Here is the Seal used on a real 2007 COLB:
Here is the Seal used on the OBAMA's bogus 2007 COLB:
Now, I may have to modify what I said about the Seal on the Obama's bogus 2007 COLB. I said that is resembled the 2008 Seal. It also seems to resemble the 2006 Seal. What it definitely does not resemble is a 2007 Seal.
Either way you slice it, the 2007 Obama COLB, does not look like a real 2007 COLB; but, hey it does bear a striking resemblance to a real 2006 COLB. It has a Seal like a 2006 Seal. It has a border that looks more like a 2006 border than a 2007 border.
Could Obama's bogus 2007 COLB be a forged image made of 2006 COLB parts? At least!
I’ve asked this many times before and never gotten an answer, so maybe you’ll humor me. How can someone claim a document is legitimate or false when they have not seen the document?
"How can someone claim a document is legitimate or false when the document doesn't exist?"
Second queston
Let’s say you read your birth certificate to me and you read you were born in general hospital. Let’s say there was no general hospital. I would conclude your document is false or wrong without reading it.
The claim is that the image of the document is a forgery not that the document itself is a forgery. No one has seen the actual document.
My second question would be the same as my first question, since you completely avoided it.
I don’t care where he was born, I care about his Immigration status.
Hi Polarik,
I’ve been busy so I haven’t kept up on all the technical aspects of your work so forgive me if you’ve addressed this already. I’m a little confused on the Factcheck photo part.
Could the Factcheck people or forger have printed a hard copy of their scanned forgery then taken photos of the forgery?
In other words, could I create a birth certificate for Mickey Mouse that I cobbled together using images of real birth certificates in my Photoshop program then print out a hard copy on my printer. Then use my digital camera to take photos of it and declare that my digital photos prove my Mickey Mouse Birth Certificate is real?
By the way, I absolutely agree the COLB is a terrible forgery.
Careful....Lamphere has turned on the previous BC guests.
I just looked at my Original 1959 Kansas Birth Certificate.
And it has the Dr’s signature, the name of the Hospital, and even my little foot prints.
I can prove I am Natural Born unlike Obama.
From your findings, it would suggest that the forgery started with a 2006 COLB.
Initially, it had no Seal or signature. After the Obama crime syndicate learned that the COLB was being questioned because of a missing Seal and signature, they had their Photoshop guy(s) add it in.
In a speedy effort to suppress claims to it’s authenticity, they did not look into whether Hawaii changed their Seals from year to year, and used the latest 2008 version thinking it would be suffice.
To me, it appears this was a sloppy job from the start. A mosaic of at least two or three images.
Obama isn’t very computer savvy (he thought the government invented computers, remember?), so he’d go by what his *experts* would tell him.
“How can someone claim a document is legitimate or false when they have not seen the document?”
Your question illustrates the strategy of a person trying to get away with the fact that he doesn’t have the proper documents.
Mystery solved!
Hawaii merely "modified its borders" in 1961 to include the nation of Kenya. That way, Obama could say he was born "in" Hawaii.
OBAMA’S ‘BORN’ CONSPIRACY - Important and corrections.
Ping, Ping.
Got it...
Appreciate the ping ...
Thanks, LucyT
Ping.
Bumping again.
FR’s Polarik, Dr. Ron Polarik, will be a guest on Lan Lamphere’s show tonight.
At 11PM EST; 10PM CST, Listen Here:
Lan sounds like an idiot on Patriot Brigade .. at least in your session. I’m a Computer Scientist and never heard of a Drum Scanner .. rediculous. Only a Moron would draw such lame analogies.
The Worldnetdaily article on this issue is up now:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=82503
That moron doesn’t even know the difference between shareware and freeware.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.