Skip to comments.I (Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.) Did It.
Posted on 03/14/2009 9:46:52 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen
Yesterday I traveled to Idaho. I was able to address Chief Justice Roberts during the question answer session after his lecture. There were numerous cameras recording this event and simultaneous feed broadcast to all the campuses of the University of Idaho. Roughly 5,000 people in all the campuses had an opportunity to hear what I had to say, it is in video archives and now everybody knows the truth and knows that leftist media thugs such as Seattle Washington Observer shamelessly twist the truth to fit their Pro Obama blind idiot agenda.
It was a grueling day, I left home at 3 in the morning after sleeping only 3 hours and drove to San Diego, from there flew to Salt Lake City, from there to Tacoma, Washington, from there I drove for a couple of hours to be in Moscow Idaho, to address Chief Justice Roberts. After the lecture the audience was told, that they can ask questions, give their name and present a shot question. I was the first to run to the microphone and told Roberts.
(Excerpt) Read more at defendourfreedoms.us ...
Read the exerpt. Wow!
I don’t think our chances are very good on this. I do think it would be the easiest way of getting rid of our incipient dictator, because I seriously doubt that he was born here or meets the Constitutional qualifications. But it’s obvious that nobody on the Supreme Court or any other court wants to deal with it.
a tenacious woman.
glad she’s on our side.
She is a true patriot and hero.
Welcome to... Oh, forget it!
NIce read. Gob bless you Mrs. Taitz.
Thank you, Dr. Taitz!
Only Dr. Orly can save us now.
Maybe for you but for me I’ll place my salvation in the Lord Jesus Christ.
God bless Dr. Taitz! Her whole report is awesome, I encourage everyone to read it.
standing to applaud her...
Here is a different take on the event (Employing Alisky’s rule #5):
You’re a GREAT AMERICAN !
You’re a FANTASTIC LAWYER !!
You’re a ROAD WARRIOR !!!
For you other “Great Americans” out there....you’ve been challenged.....Going to a TEA PARTY NEAR YOU, isn’t too much effort anymore, is it ?
This is a great post and great article.
Dr. Taitz is indeed a patriot and is deserving of our admiration and support.
There will soon come a day when the truth WILL be known about the Usurper-in-Chief, and when it is revealed that 0bama in fact is NOT Constitutionally eligible to serve as POTUS, I will be expecting each and every one of the 0bama-enablers and sleeper-trolls on FR who have been sneering and slinging that ‘birther’ label around, to leave FR once and for all, for they will have been proven to be a pack of know-nothings and NO friend of our Constitution and our Republic.
However, she would benefit, her cause would benefit, from some focus and some editing.
She should have focused on the Clerk in the Supreme Court, and how that Clerk had violated Judicial Procedure.
She should then have made the case that she HAD a case, a case which deserved a hearing.
Instead, she brought up a great deal of evidence for charges that, even if brought, would not be brought before the Supreme Court under original jurisdiction.
Again, I really like Taitz, but she needs to get someone to handle the PR, so that she can concentrate on law.
Wow. This woman is one competent and tenacious fighter.
Roberts stated "I will read your documents, I will review them. Give them to my Secret Service Agent and I will review them". His Secret Service Agent approached me and stated " Give me all the documents, I promise you Justice Roberts will get them". I had a full suitcase of documents. The agent went to look for a box, he found a large box to fit all the documents, he showed me his badge, and introduced himself as Gilbert Shaw, secret Service Agent assigned to the security of Chief Justice Roberts.
It may be possible but coming from a fed LE background myself, The USSS does not guard the SCOTUS. SCOTUS has its own sworn LE agency and if protective details are needed, members of SCOTUS Police travel under special deputation through the US Marshal's Service. In extreme cases where things might get dicey, the USMS may assign agents for protective details as warranted...not the USSS.
Something could have been different on this trip, or the USSS might be anticipating something and assigning agents, but certainly NOT the norm.
I remember her talking about SS agents with Scalia and thought maybe she just assumed they were from the Secret Service...Fed agents in suits all look alike...but now she says she was badged. Not sure what to think of this.
Stay on the religion threads, please.
I gave him
1.Motion fo reconsideration of Lightfoot v Bowen with all the supplemental briefs.
2. Quo Warranto Easterling et al v Obama et al
3. 3300 pages of your names, people that signed WorldNetDaily petition, demanding that the Supreme Court hear Obama elligibility case.
4. Copy of a 164 page dossier and all the other documents sent to Eric Holder, Attorney General, describing suspected criminal activity, associated with Obama and his supporters. It described a whole campaign of cyber crimes, intimidation, harassment, defamation and assassination of character, impersonation of US army officer Scott Easterling and impersonation of me, it showed screen shots of information being erased from the docket of the Supreme Court, it contained information of court cases being created, fabricated in order to commit voter fraud and sway public opinion, it contained a list of a 100 addresses for Barack Obama with numerous different social security numbers, issued all over the country and attached to those addresses.
It showed the address Obama used in Somerville Massachusetts, attached to the social security of a man who is 118 years old.
It showed evidence of Obama committing perjury, lying under oath. It had his school registration from Indonesia under the name Barry Soetoro, citizen of Indonesia, religion Muslim.
Right after this page there was a page of Obama’s registration to become an attorney and officer of the court in Illinois, where he stated under oath that his name is Barack Hussein Obama and he had no other prior names. It contained a report from a federal agent Steven Coffman, stating that there are numerous signs of forgery in his Selective Service Certificate. It contained a letter from a renown expert Sandra Line, stating that there are signs of forgery in Obama’s short version Certification of Live Birth, and original birth certificate needs to be reviewed in order to ascertain his status.
It contained 130 current job positions for Barry Obama, Barack H. Obama and Michelle Obama, that were obtained from Intellius Jobs.com. None of them were reported on Obamas’ tax returns.
This is more like a six hour drive. If she meant Spokane instead of Tacoma, it might be believable.
“He described an event when Roberts missed most of a reception because he wanted to be there for his young son, at the sports tournament where his son was participating. He described Roberts as a caring and loving father.
At that point I was just about ready to cry. I have 3 sons, I love them too and I would love to be there, attending their events. I am a proud parent.
My oldest son scored in top one percent in the Nation in PSATs and he is in an IVY league school studying to be a doctor. He is also a gifted comedian, who formed a stand up comedy improve group and I would love to see him perform. My wo younger sons are great students.
My middle son has a beautiful low bass Elvis Presley voice, he sings opera and I would love to hear him perform. My youngest son is a top student taking 5AP classes in tenth grade, gifted mathematician and basketball player, I would love to see him get academic awards and play basketball.
I missed time with my children, time that will never come back because a am criss crossing this country talking to Justices of the Supreme court, Representatives, Senators, FBI agents, Attorney Generals, US attorneys, telling all of them, what is wrong with you? Did some evil magician put a spell on the men in this country and they stopped being men? Why are you afraid to speak up, to stand up for you constitution? Why are you afraid to tell this arrogant jerk from Africa and Indonesia- You need to go home, you cannot be a president and commander in chief because you are not a Natural born Citizen.”
God blesss this woman. She is putting her life on hold (and possibly in danger) to try to save our country!
Is this lady for real?
She can’t be doing this all by herself.
I pray there are True Patriots who we may never know in places we can’t imagine; who are working to right the wrongs that are being committed against the United States.
The efforts in the foreground must continue though with urgency. The purpose is manifold and includes a path for filling the void I hope is left when right erases wrong.
It is a dream but without dreams and vision the people perish.
Yes, this lady is ‘for real’.
Amazing that a little Russian refugee lady has the cajones to stand up and fight for America when most of us choose to bury our heads in the sand or whine and wring our hands.
May God bless and keep her.
Look, I understand the appeal of all this, but there is something about this woman’s story that doesn’t add up. The SCOTUS doesn’t use the secret service. The claim about the Scalia meeting could be attributed to a case of mistaken identify where she assumes his security was secret service, but here she claims that Roberts called his security a secret service agent and that she was shown a ss badge. That makes no sense.
Way to Go Orly!
The momentum is building:
Obama Eligibility issue Must be Resolved Soon http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd436.htm from Devvy Kidd “The frustration and rage is escalating.”
Court: No need for state to check prez’ eligibility http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91613 and .pdf of All 3 of Leo Donofrio’s QUO WARRANTO articles http://devvy.net/pdf/mar09/leo_all_parts.html from Devvy Kidd
Congressman introduces Eligibility Bill http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=4592 and http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91649 Yeah Bill Posey!
Open Letter to the Secretary of Defense http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/12/open-letter-to-the-secretary-of-defense.aspx?results=1#SurveyResultsChart
Leo Donofrio Quo Warranto Legal Brief, Part 3 http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=4515 and Leo’s Site http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
WND, Scalia: You need 4 Votes for Obama Eligibility http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91345
Orly Taitz said Americans should flood Holder’s office with calls, e-mails and faxes, urging him to take action on the case.
Debunking the Obamatoids http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter146.htm Absolutely Great Article by Lynn Stuter. So there you have it, case closed? It would be if some Judge would hear it! and
Orly meets with Scalia! http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/10/meeting-with-scalia-and-coordinated-cyber-attack.aspx “. . “. . Scalia stated that it would be heard if I can get 4 people to hear it.” Time to write the Supremes again!
Well Is He, or Isn’t He? http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.2700/pub_detail.asp
To add to this, I’m not saying that she is telling a lie about her meeting Roberts, but perhaps she is embellishing?
That's not so good. Unfortunately Dr. Taitz has a problem that will reduce her effectiveness. Perhaps because of the stress, she is starting to sound more than a little nutty.
" My name is Orly Taitz, I am an attorney from Southern California. I left home at three o'clock in the morning and flew and drove thousands of miles to talk to you and ask you a question." Roberts seemed to be impressed by that ..."
Maybe he was impressed by the fact that no one can possibly drive thousands of miles in 13 hours.
"Are you aware that there is criminal activity going on in the Supreme Court of the United States.
Also not a good start for impressing people with your sanity, even if you believe it to be true, and even if it is true.
Taitz also has comments on her blog that sound paranoid. She has a good case to present but she is starting to see all sorts of connections to it that seem to be more tenuous.
The meeting did happen. Here’s the announcement I put up at resistnet.com:
ALERT to all Members of Idaho Patriotic Resistance
ATTEND Chief Justice of the United States
John G. Roberts, Jr.
4:00pm University Ballroom, University of Idaho, Friday,
March 13, 2009
Check the URL: http://www.law.uidaho.edu/default.aspx?pid=112587
How about a few posters and a few questions? ?
Consult with Dr. Orly Taitz at firstname.lastname@example.org if you are going to ask a question.
Orly Taitz website: http://defendourfreedoms.us/
I hope many of you can attend!
Sorry, read your own quote, she FLEW and drove the distance:
” My name is Orly Taitz, I am an attorney from Southern California. I left home at three o’clock in the morning and flew and drove thousands of miles to talk to you and ask you a question.” Roberts seemed to be impressed by that ...”
Maybe he was impressed by the fact that no one can possibly drive thousands of miles in 13 hours.
Dr. Olry is extremely busy, and she stated that she has to write in a hurry- plus English is not her first language.
She could have confused some details.
Cut this lady some slack. At least she’s DOING something
which is more than can be said for most of us.
Very intriguing. Is their (SCOTUS) protection part of the US Marshall’s Service or another agency entirely?
Is there video of this encounter with Justice Roberts from yesterday?
She said, “There were numerous cameras recording this event and simultaneous feed broadcast to all the campuses of the University of Idaho.”, so I bet the University of Idaho has it in the can. Hope it shows up on You Tube. .
Yes, I noticed that after I posted (I didn't get much sleep last night either.) But I stand by the rest of what I said. Some of her own comments are undermining her presentation of her case and her ability to convince the largest possible group of people possible outside the court to take her seriously.
Also note #23.
Also another point I noticed after I posted:
"now everybody knows the truth and knows that leftist media thugs such as Seattle Washington Observer shamelessly twist the truth to fit their Pro Obama blind idiot agenda."
I have spent a lot of time around Seattle and I have never heard of the Seattle Washington Observer.
“There were numerous cameras recording this event and simultaneous feed broadcast to all the campuses of the University of Idaho. Roughly 5,000 people in all the campuses had an opportunity to hear what I had to say, it is in video archives and now everybody knows the truth and knows that leftist media thugs such as Seattle Washington Observer shamelessly twist the truth to fit their Pro Obama blind idiot agenda.”
Above, Dr. Orly states ‘it is in vido achives’. I will look for it.
There will absolutely be tape - this was the Bellwood lecture series and they're all recorded. More later as I learn it.
Looked at the Bellwood lecture series site and found nothing.
The video may show up here:
when she has time to post it.
That's the understatement of this short century. It does the conservative cause no good when we have people like this fighting our fights. Her earlier pleadings to the court and statements to the media have been filled will misspellings, poor grammar and legal arguments that could be demolished by first year law students. (i.e., she said she would have the president "arrested" for contempt of court...Oh brother!).
Not only are her legal skills and acumen in tremendous doubt, be she does seem to be exhibiting signs of delusion and altered reality. This episode coupled with her Scalia claims from earlier in the week, make we wonder if she isn't in some kind of psychological distress.
Go back to Obong- and don’t forget your kneepads.
You’re wasting your time here.
If you think that this woman has even a shred of credibility, then you've got WAY BIGGER problems than who the President is.
It's clear that this is starting to take its toll. She definitely needs more sleep.
This episode coupled with her Scalia claims from earlier in the week, make we wonder if she isn't in some kind of psychological distress.
Based upon her description, my impression is that she really was at the Scalia event. Scalia was plugging a book about how to make your case to judges and he probably responded to her questions in that light. It's not clear that Scalia was aware that she already had a case before the court. Of course that fact fits in with Taitz's theory that there is a conspiracy involving the court clerks.
As Taitz has made a number of errors of fact in her blog statements, I think I would tend to wonder if she quoted Scalia 100% correctly.
“Amazing that a little Russian refugee lady has the cajones to stand up and fight for America when most of us choose to bury our heads in the sand or whine and wring our hands.”
She came here to escape the tyranny that she experienced first hand in the Soviet Union. Now she is seeking to reverse that same sort of tyranny as it is being implemented here with the ascension of this lying crypto-marxist demagogue and his corrupt allies in Congress.
The sheeple here have no idea of the socialist misery that they are in for if the Obamunists prevail.
Yes, Scalia might answer a question the way he did if it was a general question about the court's procedures and policies. But, Ms. Taitz claims in her blog that she identified herself and referenced the case that she was party to and asked a specific question to Scalia about that specific case. In no reality would Scalia have any Ex Parte discussion with counsel for a case that is either before the court or will be coming before the court.
I suppose one could chalk up these mistakes to Ms. Taitz's "English as a second language" problem. But from where I sit, it's becoming increasingly difficult.
I don’t know anything about this attorney and it’s obvious she was there, as even the Seattle paper reported it; however, there’s a couple of odd things in her account. She says she flew to Tacoma, WA. She must have meant “SeaTac” which is the airport for the Puget Sound; however, it’s not in Tacoma. Then she says she drove “a couple hours” to Moscow, Idaho from Tacoma. A couple hours? Hardly. It’s at least a 6 hour drive, especially considering she would have encountered the horrendous Puget Sound traffic and have to go over a mountain pass that can be snowy this time of year. And why fly into SeaTac? Spokane, WA would make much more sense, as it IS “a couple of hours” from Spokane to Moscow, ID. Maybe in fact that is what she did, but said Tacoma instead of Spokane. Anyway, anyone familiar with Washington would read that account and say “HUH???”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.