Posted on 03/28/2009 3:43:32 PM PDT by nysuperdoodle
Stockbridge, Georgia- The questions over the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to occupy his current position as President of the United States continue to be raised. After being presented with evidence in the matter, a citizens' grand jury convened by Carl Swensson in Georgia has returned an indictment against Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Sutoro.
Reportedly the sealed indictment, scheduled to be delivered to prosecutors on Monday, includes counts of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. "It's a done deal, and the people of the State of Georgia demand action on this matter," said Carl Swensson after the grand jury proceedings had finished. "I can't comment on this other than to say that the sealed indictment will be delivered to prosecutors on Monday."
(Excerpt) Read more at evilconservativeonline.com ...
In case you were wondering,March for Your Country.com is long on motivational patriotic material...and a nice clear plea for donations.
Evidently,declining gas prices have limited its “marching orders”.
http://www.marchforyourcountry.com/
OH-oh-oh !!
There’s more !!!
http://www.riseupforamerica.com/
Never mind the Constitution, folks: we use the Magna Carta !!
Oh good, the indictment is “sealed”!
mrmeangenes wrote:
This is a make-believe grand jury...but,what the heck: run with it !
Pretty much sums it up. A "Common Law Grand Jury."
If you want to convene your own Grand Jury, maybe to indict the Pres__ent's Teleprompter as well, just follow the easy steps outlined at http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/grandjuryrules.htm.
This will go nowhere. The prosecutor they take this to will put it in his automated filing system:
It’ll go nowhere even if there is evidence. We can’t have a constitutional disturbance, can we?
Let sleeping dogs lie.
“Let sleeping dogs lie.”
Why? The issue of 0bama’s eligibility is a critical Constitutional issue. It deserves a full and complete hearing and, ultimately, resolution.
The courts have, to date, found reasons to deny suits seeking such hearing and resolution. If this exercise in GA gets more heat under the pretender and the activist judges that have abrogated their responsibilities under the Constitution, then that is a very good thing.
I saw a report, earlier, that this question is now getting some reporting in the EU, particularly in Poland. That is also a very good thing.
It’s time to take back the country.
Just keep applying pressure, you never know when a break will come. Someday we actually might find out who this character is.
Right you are. Every law suit re; bc, every tea party pokes this sob with a stick. Death by a thousand paper cuts..
I’m afraid you’re mistaken. The Constitution sets forth the procedure, and if there are no objections, then Congress’s counting of the electoral votes constitutes certifying his eligibility. That’s the legal truth. Legally, there is apparently nothing that can be done unless he’s impeached.
Quite possibly there will be many things for which he could be impeached soon.
The only thing that could change this would be proof that surfaces and is made public that he committed fraud. The problem the accusers have is that they have no evidence.
Henry County? This should be interesting.
It does? Quote it from the Constitution for us. If you are talking about the electoral vote counting act of 1877, perhaps you can explain to us how it supports the Constitution by NOT requiring that eligibility qualifications be presented by the President elect. An "act" of Congress cannot override a provision in the U.S. Constitution. It takes an "amendment" to do that. If an act does not support the Constitution, it is "unconstitutional". This is why the electoral vote counting procedure which currently requires that someone raise their hand in objection is unconstitutional. This burden of proof is clearly written into section three of the twentieth amendment as that of the person seeking the office of President.
Coming soon to every small town in America.
This case is beginning to grow legs. Goodbye Obama!
I missed this one entirely in MSNBC.
What an education I get when I come to this site.I like to think the same thing about FreeRepublic. (In fact I was thinking of posting a similar thought when I returned to the thread.)
But I could not. When I tried to return, the thread was gone. It had been pulled by the Moderator and the reason given was "Nonsense." While I might agree that the notion that a "runaway" Grand Jury presentment against the President of the United States is not likely to go anywhere, the notion that these quaint institutions established by the Framers, since the great modern thinkers don't like them, are "outmoded" is one of the many things that FreeRepublic ought to be about. Moderators who call such threads, "Nonsense," need remedial training if they are allowed to remain at all.
ML/NJ
Good luck with that. The mods seem to get their direction from JimRob.
Yep. I wonder if the people running with this thought through the implications. If this were permissible, could I get 25 of my friends together and start issuing indictments as I please?
Yeah: just claim authority under the Magna Carta. All the Barons of the Realm are doing that this year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.