Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bureaucrats Will Carry Out Mandatory Home Inspections Under Climate Bill
Propaganda Matrix/Unite or Die ^ | Paul Joseph Watson

Posted on 07/03/2009 8:20:30 AM PDT by seven.sixtwo

The controversial climate bill that is set to be taken up by the Senate on Monday after its passage in the House will legislate home inspections by government regulators who will demand to audit every aspect of your property under the threat of substantial and repeated fines if their visits are denied or their demands not satisfied.

The climate legislation is written in a manner that automatically assumes that global warming is taking place and that it is attributed to rising CO2 levels, despite the fact that this is a highly contentious question and is being rejected by more and more scientists as time goes by.

As Tony Pacheco writes in his excellent article today, the bill will "audit every aspect of your home and life".

(Excerpt) Read more at uniteordie.org ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: bill; climate; inspections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: wolf24

This section of Cap and Trade is not getting any national press. Mainly, I believe, they haven’t read it. The politicians don’t care, as they get porkulus in return for signing it. I say follow the money on these home inspections, to see who is behind this. It could really depress the market. If a person has no money to comply, and needs to sell a home, what happens??? Foreclosure???


41 posted on 07/03/2009 9:11:15 AM PDT by Achilles Heel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

>> You mean the all-or-nothing, “I’d rather see Obama than McCain”, short-sighted, cut-off-nose-despite-face ‘conservatives’?

Pull your head out of your ass. That’s not what tanked McCain.

MCCAIN tanked McCain. McCain had neither the skill nor the WILL to win. It was his to lose, and he lost it.

I hated the SOB but I voted for him anyway. Actually I voted for Sarah. My guess is the vast majority of those you impugn with your sniveling rant did exactly the same.

I hate him and all RINOS and all their bloviating apologists twice as much now.


42 posted on 07/03/2009 9:11:55 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Achilles Heel

You sell the home without light bulbs in the light fixtures.


43 posted on 07/03/2009 9:12:54 AM PDT by Sundog (I hope Michelle Obama isn't going to be punished with a baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Well, I need to see the legislation written about these supposed home inspections and any fines. I had heard about an energy inspection when you sell your home. That alone is outrageous and will severely hurt the housing market. But coming into my house to check out my energy usage? Come-on - this will be the line in the sand for every home-owner.

We need to know more details and affirm if this is true or not.


44 posted on 07/03/2009 9:14:51 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: seven.sixtwo; All

Where in the bill does it say this? Anyone got a link to the text? I can’t find this in the House version, this is as close as I can get:

1 ‘‘(2) STATE CERTIFICATION.—Not later than 2
2 years after the date of a certification under sub
3 section (c)(1) or the application of a national energy
4 efficiency building code under subsection (d)(1),
5 each State shall certify that it has—
6 ‘‘(A) achieved compliance with—
7 ‘‘(i) State codes, or, as provided under
8 State law, local codes, with respect to
9 which a certification was accepted by the
10 Secretary under subsection (c)(2)(B); or
11 ‘‘(ii) the national energy efficiency
12 building code, as applicable; or
13 ‘‘(B) for any certification submitted within
14 7 years after the date of enactment of the
15 American Clean Energy and Security Act of
16 2009, made significant progress toward achiev
17 ing such compliance.
18 ‘‘(3) ACHIEVING COMPLIANCE.—A State shall
19 be considered to achieve compliance with a code de
20 scribed in paragraph (2)(A) if at least 90 percent of
21 new and substantially renovated building space in
22 that State in the preceding year upon inspection
23 meets the requirements of the code. A certification
24 under paragraph (2) shall include documentation of
25 the rate of compliance based on—

1 ‘‘(A) independent inspections of a random
2 sample of the new and substantially renovated
3 buildings covered by the code in the preceding
4 year; or
5 ‘‘(B) an alternative method that yields an
6 accurate measure of compliance as determined
7 by the Secretary.

/////////////////////////

Seems to cover inspection of new or recently renovated buildings by the State to see if it meets the code, IF the state has adopted the federal energy codes.


45 posted on 07/03/2009 9:17:34 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene
I would have thought the 'line in the sand' would have been:

A non-US Citizen being installed as POTUS

Appointment of umpty-gazillion CZARs to subvert the affirmation process and issue unenacted edicts

The confiscation of a legal US company (Chrysler) by the US Government and awarding 'ownership' to its former employees while simultaneously subverting and aborting US bankruptcy laws.

The Senate confirmation of appointed constitutional officers who are tax cheats

This could go on all day......it's just death by a thousand cuts...and we ARE bleeding - every minute.

46 posted on 07/03/2009 9:20:20 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: seven.sixtwo

I watched Stuart Varney rip a supporter to shreds on FOX yesterday about this


47 posted on 07/03/2009 9:23:00 AM PDT by Revelation 911 (How many 100's of 1000's of our servicemen died so we would never bow to a king?" -freeper pnh102)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seven.sixtwo

Will this finally get the majority of Americans to realize what the hell they voted for? I can hope.
Or are they too stupid to know who to blame it on? Just give them 24/7 Michael Jackson and they won’t care.


48 posted on 07/03/2009 9:23:35 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (what happened to the country that I once knew?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinking
“the vast majority of homes meet the latest engineering standards”

Irrelevant except for getting a foot in the door. When it suits them, they will just replace the technical engineering standards with political(ly correct) engineering standards.

49 posted on 07/03/2009 9:25:41 AM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: seven.sixtwo
Chairmen (?)
50 posted on 07/03/2009 9:26:01 AM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evilwhitepatriot

Would that be Obama’s “Civilian National Security Force”?


51 posted on 07/03/2009 9:28:15 AM PDT by jughandle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: Venturer
I wonder what this will do to the already crippled housing market?

I predict there will be a boom in job creation for professional arsonists.

Rather than try to sell your house, you just burn it down and collect the insurance (from government owned AIG, I suppose).

All of the smoke from burning houses will do wonders for climate change and the environment.

53 posted on 07/03/2009 9:47:30 AM PDT by seowulf (Petraeus, cross the Rubicon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: seven.sixtwo

Zooming way past Canada in the fast lane to socialism


54 posted on 07/03/2009 10:06:14 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
I hated the SOB but I voted for him anyway.

Hey, stupid! If you voted for lousy McCain, you don't belong in the group that said they would prefer Obama over McCain.

Engage brain prior to posting.

55 posted on 07/03/2009 10:25:30 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

You’re missing my point, mushforbrains.

Conservatives didn’t sink McCain, as you and those like you love to whine and insinuate. Period. I’m sick of you and others who claim otherwise, instead of admitting the truth: McCain was a crappy candidate.


56 posted on 07/03/2009 10:35:38 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Stop dissing drunken sailors! At least they spend their OWN money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten

“As bad as it was under King George III”

There’s a thought: the obective of repudiating life, liberty and the pursuit of (what was originally property) happiness, along with the Bill of Rights. Maybe even the other amendments. Hadn’t considered those moves, but I am not up on my 3D chess.

Celente video recently:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIPSrKbYp0U

Now, don’t you go listening or thinking too hard on July 4th about this. The 5th maybe, but not the 4th.


57 posted on 07/03/2009 10:43:50 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Fili et Spiritus Sancti.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: thinking

Bulldozing the neighborhoods/cities is already on the table. Google it.


58 posted on 07/03/2009 10:45:16 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Fili et Spiritus Sancti.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

That’s the idea.


59 posted on 07/04/2009 4:00:27 AM PDT by exnavy (I'll keep my God and my guns, the dems can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: seven.sixtwo; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

60 posted on 07/07/2009 4:11:58 AM PDT by steelyourfaith ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money" - Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson