Posted on 01/23/2010 10:19:54 AM PST by rabscuttle385
Paul Streitz has decided to call Sarah Palin by her real name, because she endorsed John McCain (who is trying to win a fifth term as Senator) and said she will campaign for him. Fanatic Palinites, such as the editors of the misnamed „conservatives4palin.com” website (they should rename it „liberals4palin.com”), lambasted him and called him a “backstabber”.
“If Paul Streitz’s support of Governor Palin is contingent upon his agreeing with every decision she makes or her selling out her deeply-held values, that’s unfortunate. While all support is appreciated, the governor has never been for sale. Ask the Alaska establishment, who learned that early in her political career.”
Palin has proven that she IS for sale – if one picks her for veep. She’s endorsed a despicable traitor because he chose her as his veep.
Palin is so dishonest (or so ignorant) that she didn’t even tell the truth about why she endorsed John McLame. She claimed that:
“John McCain is on fire to kill Obama’s government takeover of healthcare and that’s what I want to see.”
Which might be incorrect, because McCain favors the SAME policy on socialized medicine as Obama – he just might vote against this particular Act. McCain favors socialized medicine, as proven by Steven Warshawsky:
“McCain’s campaign website [of 2008 – ZM] demonstrates that his thinking on this issue is much closer to Hillary Clinton than Adam Smith. For example, McCain states that “controlling costs” is his top priority, and that “nothing short of a complete reform of the culture of our health system and the way we pay for it will suffice.” This is a recipe for massive government interference in the health care industry. McCain also supports universal coverage, claiming that “we can and must provide access to health care for all our citizens.” Completing the liberal trifecta, at the January 5 ABC NEWS debate, when Romney criticized McCain for “turn[ing] the pharmaceutical companies into the big bad guys,” McCain replied, “Well, they are.” Plainly, if he were president, McCain would serve as the Democrats’ “useful idiot” for their plan to impose socialized medicine on the nation.”
Also, I’ve heard from a friend that McCain will likely now try to save the socialized medicine bill. So on socialized medicine, McCain and Obama differ only about particular bills, NOT about the merits of socialized medicine itself.
What about the task of protecting the American people? No duty is more important than that one. But on that issue, McCain is also liberal and unreliable. Palin falsely claimed that:
“And his commitment and his leadership on national security to win the war on terror, that’s what we need. (…) national security, he gets it. He understands how to win.”
Palin is flat wrong. McCain is NOT committed to the task of defending the American people, and he’s not a leader on anything except liberal policies. He „doesn’t get it”. He doesn’t understand how to win the Global War on Terrorists, nor does he understand any defense issue or foreign policy issue confronting America now. I’ve written several articles pertaining to this guy, demonstrating what McCain’s specific policies are, and why they are wrong. So I’m not going to repeat those entire articles. Let me comment again on McCain’s policy on the GWOT, though, because that’s one specific issue that Palin mentioned.
John McCain does NOT say that America should attack its enemies before they attack America. He also endorsed Obama’s decision to close Guantanamo, and he opposes “enhanced interrogation techniques”, which are absolutely necessary to gain intel information and protect America.
McCain also buys the PC propaganda about the root causes of the Islamic threat. He believes that these root causes are “poverty, tyranny and despair”, and ignores what terrorists themselves say motivates them: the Quran, which contains several explicit commandments to kill nonbelievers.
In short, McCain doesn’t recognize the real nature of the Islamic threat, and he’s not prepared to combat it effectively. Anyone who isn’t prepared to combat it effectively is a person who doesn’t belong in the Senate. If the GWOT is the most important issue for you, McCain is undisputably the worst possible Senatorial candidate from Arizona.
I did not include McCain’s cretinous, liberal, anti-American policies on foreign policy issues other than the GWOT, even though I could (foreign policy is not limited to the GWOT, although Sarah Palin, as an ignorant person, doesn’t understand that). My articles about McCain refute his idiotic policies, so I just wrote a reply to what Palin explicitly said. She did not comment on McCain’s treasonous policies like nuclear disarmament and the progressive abolition of conventional weapon programs (which are necessary to protect America against China).
The failed 2008 VP candidate also said this about McCain:
“And he is a statesman, and I don’t hesitate at all to say, no.”
Which is not true. McCain is not a statesman; anyone who calls him a statesman insults real statesmen. A genuine statesman fights for the right policies, regardless of ideology; works for his country 24/7; and retires when he should.
McCain has spent the last 9 years promoting destructive liberal policies to punish the GOP for its decision to give Bush the 2000 Republican nomination; he’s been working against the US and for his liberal ideology (together with fellow liberals like Kennedy, Obama, Russ Feingold, and Hillary Clinton); and he has refused to retire – he’s vying for his fifth term as Senator. By comparison, George Washington refused to serve as President for a 3rd term, even though as of 1797, there were no presidential term limits. McCain is running to keep his salary, not to serve the American people, whose opinions are irrelevant for him.
Palin ended her statement thus:
“we do need his leadership, especially on those two fronts: Government takeover of healthcare, he wants to kill it; national security, he gets it. He understands how to win.”
See above. Her claims are false.
Whether she uttered those claims because she’s ignorant or because she knows they’re false and decided to lie for McCain, only Palin knows. Regardless of the answer to that question, she’s not qualified for the Presidency, as she has proven with these statements and other utterances. She embarrasses herself everytime she speaks. Conservatives4palin.com editors claim that she is simply behaving like a loyal person. But one’s own country is supreme to any person and any requirement for loyal individuals. When the choice is “Either the country or the person you should loyally endorse”, a real hero, a real patriot, a real statesman/stateswoman chooses the country, not the person. Palin has endorsed a strident liberal who’s trying to enrich himself with taxpayers’ money.
I was a fan of Palin myself. But I’m now convinced that she’s not a conservative, nor is she a politician qualied for the Presidency of the United States. She’s simply just another RINO endorsing another RINO. No real conservative would ever endorse McCain for the Senate.
You kept your promise!
:)
Kay Bailey Hutchison = RINO,
George H.W. Bush = RINO,
Ronald Reagan = RINO, and
Ron Paul = HERO.
anyone who thinks Sarah Palin is a Rino is a moron
if anything Mccain is now a conservative.
The left continues to try and destroy Sarah Palin...HA
LOL....
It shows you how much “in trouble” a lot of FReepers are... :-)
No real conservative would ever endorse McCain for the Senate.
Those are offshoots of the tendency to form circular firing squads. You backstab anyone who survives the firing squad.
Even in love/marriage, one can't find someone they can aagree with 100% of the time.
People should get real.
Based off of Reagan’s 1975 interview in Reason magazine, if Reagan were alive today, I doubt he would have much in agreement with Ron Paul.
Here are my thoughts on this issue:
I don’t feel like McCain really deserves her support, but she almost has to support him, doesn’t she? If she doesn’t, she will come off as mean spirited and petty.
I feel like she’s in between a rock and a hard place here.
Is the GOP somehow hoping to work this out for McCain’s advantage and guarantee his re-election by a loyal Palin following? If that’s the case, they are grasping at straws. I believe Palin followers are too smart to fall for that.
Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter also supported McCain are, they RINOs?
Given McCain’s track record and positions, what on earth do you think would make Palin pull her endorsement of him, if what he actually is NOW, won’t? It’s hardly a threat.
Yes, the Sarah bashers are using this to try to undermine confindence in Sarah. We have the Romney/Huckabeebots on FR and all of the dimwit trolls on FR trying to sow discontent on the most conservative candidate to come down the pike in many years. Anyone who studies her record in Alaska and believes she is a RINO has sh** for brains. I will keep supporing Sarah and will vote for her if she runs. Personally I don't think she will run for President, I feel the attacks on her family took their toll on her. However, that doesn't change the fact she is a great person and repaying her debt to McCain is part of being a great person.
Well, Amen! to that.... :-)
I have suspected for a long time, that Sarah Palin is indeed a RINO.
I tend to think it’s out of loyalty too - severely misguided loyalty.
Well since MaCain is a lose, lose for Sarah she needs to first do wants right and then do whats best for her.
What's right? Is it right to stab MaCain in the back? She was after all his Veep pick. Is Hayworth really that better of a choice? I will leave that one for you to decide.
What's best for her? No way in hell is Sarah going to get elected to ANYTHING if the American voters see her as traitorous ungrateful back stabbing b*tch. Yes this will hurt her with the purists that can not see the forest thru the trees and yes other opportunists seeking to advance themself (Allen Keys anyone) will roast her in the fires of hell. But if you think about it, she really had no choice. She made her deal with the devil in 2008 and now he wants his pound of flesh.
Based off of Reagan’s 1975 interview in Reason magazine, if Reagan were alive today, I doubt he would have much in agreement with Ron Paul.
Well, that alone would get me to vote for Regan once again... :-)
I am tempted to hit the ‘report abuse’ button. lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.