Posted on 01/28/2010 2:37:32 PM PST by rxsid
An Open Letter to Glenn Beck
From: Charles Kerchner, Commander USNR (Retired)
Written: 28 Jan 2010
"Glenn, you say you have studied the founders and framers of our U.S. Constitution to try to learn more about the original intent and meanings of the words therein.
I Believe The Fix Was In for the 2008 Election and The Cover Up is Still Going Strong and Has Created Tthe Perfect Storm for a Constitutional Crisis!
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/i-believe-fix-was-in-for-2008-election.html
Glenn, when are you going to read the preeminent legal treatise of the time of the Revolutionary War against Great Britain that was used by the founders to write the Declaration of Independence and the framers to craft our U.S. Constitution. Benjamin Franklin referred to it as being in heavy use and demand by the delegates at the Continental Congress in 1775 when four copies were sent to him by Dumas who published a newly edited edition in 1775. It was written in French the diplomatic language of the time of which Franklin and many others who founded our nation were fluent in as well as English.
The term, "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness", is a direct quote from this book. And there are many more quotes from it in our Declaration of Independence and Constitution. And this book is even mentioned by name in Article III of the U.S. Constitution.
This book was the legal reference book describing a new form of government for governing a Constitutional Republic with a written Constitution that George Washington had on his desk and was observed reading from in his first day in office in New York and it was the legal book John Jay had on his desk as the 1st Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. John Jay's letter to George Washington is the reason the legal term of art from that legal book is in Article II of the U.S. Constitution as to the eligibility requirements to be President.
The name of the book is, "The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law", by Vattel. I recommend you read it. If you don't have time to read it all, read at least Volume 1. And if you don't have time to read that, the read Vol.1, Chapter 19, Section 212, on the natural law definitions of "Citizenship" and the separate meaning and definition of the legal term of art "natural born Citizen".
The question for constitutional standards regarding Obama is not whether he is a Citizen of the U.S., but whether he is a "natural born Citizen" of the U.S. to Constitutional standards as envisioned by the founders and framers of the Constitution and reiterated in four U.S. Supreme Court decisions over the next 100 years of this nation until the progressive movement started to blur those two terms in the eyes and minds of the American people so their political party can put forward and elect anyone to the office of President and Commander in Chief (CINC) of our military. The President and CINC per the founders intent must have sole allegiance at birth to only the USA with no citizenship at birth from his parents in any other nation. That is a "natural born Citizen", citizenship at birth in only the USA. He must be born in the USA to two Citizens of the USA to achieve natural born Citizenship and sole allegiance at birth. Obama was born with dual-citizenship. He was not eligible per the founders intent. But the Progressive movement has convinced People otherwise. And you are helping them with their cover up.
Read Vattel's, "The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law", Vol. 1, Chapter 19, Section 212. This is natural law given to nature from God. Pray on it. Then speak the truth from the heart. Speak truth to power. You have the ability to save the Constitution and the Republic. Please speak up on the true meaning of "natural born Citizen" and educate the People on the difference between born Citizen, naturalized Citizen, and "natural born Citizen" http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-US-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same
I am a Son of the American Revolution. I served my country in the military for 33 years on active duty and reserves. I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution, not to defend a President or a man.
Please read this book and then speak out about it on your shows.
Sincerely,
Charles Kerchner
Commander USNR (Retired)
Pennsylvania
http://www.protectourliberty.org"
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/01/open-letter-to-glenn-beck.html
I didn’t mean you yourself trashed the issue.
I meant Beck is trashing and ridiculing the issue.
Nevermind. I misread what you wrote. You meant Beck was attacking the issue, not me. Sorry
And there’s the flame...
Simply put - No"
Excellent. Therefore the question. How could he possibly be a NBC? Answer, he can't. Thus, we fight.
No problem. I should have written it clearer.
My prayers regarding this issue have not changed. Praying for the truth to come to light. There are many people covering up something. All of them should pay for the lies and cover-ups.
In the context of my previous statement, it would seem perhaps the only reasonable explanation as to why he would openly (and multiple times) mock and potentially alienate a (undoubtedly) significant portion of his listener-ship/viewer-ship. That's not a good business decision.
As has been mentioned above here, the FCC controls the licenses of all those mentioned here. I believe it's withing the realm of possibilities that someone from the FCC (or other regulatory agency?) warned the talkers that this topic is off limits if they want to keep their licenses active and avoid some trumped up legal headaches.
If Republican leadership chooses to ignore the clear definition chosen by our founders to help protect us from foreign intrigue they will have buried themselves. They may be afraid to talk, but now they should be afraid not to face the truth of the lies by both parties. The people may forgive the decision to let McCain take his shot, again, because of the price he paid in a prison camp, and in spite of the Keating Five and McCain Feingold, and his idiocy with regard to global warming. If they don't face the truth they will split the party because too many of us can read - Marshall, Jay, Jefferson, Washington, Waite, ... “A natural born citizen is born in the country of parents who are its citizens.” Every U.S. Senator knew this truth in 2008 when they all signed Senate Res. 511 to provide cover for McCain and silence objections to Obama’s ineligibility.
Every founder knew this definition from Vattel's Law of Nations. Thomas Jefferson created the course in Natural Law and the Law of Nations at William and Mary College in 1779 - ten years prior to 'ratification'. John Marshall and Bushrod Washington were among his students in 1780. The text, until 1841 was Vattel's. Vattel's Law of Nations was the most cited legal source in American Jurisprudence between 1789 and 1820.
withing the realm -> within the realm
...
If they don't face the truth they will split the party because too many of us can read - Marshall, Jay, Jefferson, Washington, Waite, ... “A natural born citizen is born in the country of parents who are its citizens.”
...
Every founder knew this definition from Vattel's Law of Nations. Thomas Jefferson created the course in Natural Law and the Law of Nations at William and Mary College in 1779 - ten years prior to 'ratification'. John Marshall and Bushrod Washington were among his students in 1780. The text, until 1841 was Vattel's. Vattel's Law of Nations was the most cited legal source in American Jurisprudence between 1789 and 1820. "
An absolutely brilliant and spot on post Spaulding! IMHO of course.
He mentioned Hillary giving two radical islamists entry to the US last week and he said he has asked her to speak for his removal on that Britain list. Obama would never allow that if she would. Savage speaks his mind.
But I still think it is interesting what he said about being able to speak unlike the others in talk radio who owe or have paid sponsors who control what they say.
A good point indeed.
Just giving them a few names might make them shut up.
They would have the research department to see who these people were: Lois Anderson for one.
Intimidated and threatened by his goon squad.
Did Glenn fall of the wagon and start drinking again or did his porn addiction (he admitted to both on the radio) flare up again?
I really liked Glenn but his friendship with O’Reilly was the other final straw. Glenn is just an Obama,Soros NWO, Bilderberg,Davos stooge
I love idiots like you, Glenn and O’reeilly work together, b\do you possibly think that a little give and go would be helpful to ratings?? and the name calling at the beginning of your asinine statement....very professional sounding....perhaps you are a christian and showing your “forgiveness” mode...probably not. I have an idea, if you cannot refute what he says, without name calling, shut up....you are pathetic
I heard the same thing and don't think it was a rerun. And he said it while *rolling his eyes* which it like fingernails on a blackboard to me.
Hannity is not my fave because he has some Dems on and Newt plus McCain. I do like Pat Caddell. Sean to his credit is always respectful. He does not seem to be the type to smear “birthers” or people who want the Constitution upheld.
Beck and O’Reilly road show should have them in clown suits. These “anti birthers” which includes McCain - sicken me. They are as bad as Obama and they are cowards.
Plus the issue of a probably renounced American citizenship — if he had it to begin with — and acceptance of Indonesian citizenship upon his adoption by his mother’s husband, Soetero.
Yep, he railed on them yesterday. When he came on today, I turned the tv off. See ya Glen you arrogant SOB.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.