Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GLOBAL INTERNET VOTING FIRM BUYS U.S. ELECTION RESULTS REPORTING FIRM
Black Box Voting ^ | 1-12-12 | Bev Harris

Posted on 01/17/2012 10:09:34 AM PST by STARWISE

In a major step towards global centralization of election processes, the world's dominant Internet voting company has purchased the USA's dominant election results reporting company.

When you view your local or state election results on the Internet, on portals which often appear to be owned by the county elections division, in over 525 US jurisdictions you are actually redirected to a private corporate site controlled by SOE software, which operates under the name ClarityElections.com.

The good news is that this firm promptly reports precinct-level detail in downloadable spreadsheet format.

As reported by BlackBoxVoting.org in 2008, the bad news is that this centralizes one middleman access point for over 525 jurisdictions in AL, AZ, CA, CO, DC, FL, KY, MI, KS, IL, IN, NC, NM, MN, NY, SC, TX, UT, WA. And growing.

As local election results funnel through SOE's servers (typically before they reach the public elsewhere), those who run the computer servers for SOE essentially get "first look" at results and the ability to immediately and privately examine vote details throughout the USA.

In 2004, many Americans were justifiably concerned when, days before the presidential election, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell redirected Ohio election night results through the Tennessee-based server for several national Republican Party operations.

This is worse: This redirects results reporting to a centralized privately held server which is not just for Ohio, but national; not just USA-based, but global.

A mitigation against fraud by SOE insiders has been the separation of voting machine systems from the SOE results reports. Because most US jurisdictions require posting evidence of results from each voting machine at the precinct, public citizens can organize to examine these results to compare with SOE results. Black Box Voting spearheaded a national citizen action to videotape / photograph these poll tapes in 2008.

With the merger of SOE and SCYTL, that won't work (if SCYTL's voting system is used). When there are two truly independent sources of information, the public can perform its own "audit" by matching one number against the other.

These two independent sources, however, will now be merged into one single source: an Internet voting system controlled by SCYTL, with a results reporting system also controlled by SCYTL.

With SCYTL internet voting, there will be no ballots. No physical evidence. No chain of custody. No way for the public to authenticate who actually cast the votes, chain of custody, or the count.

SCYTL is moving into or already running elections in: the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Norway, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, South Africa, India and Australia.

SCYTL is based in Barcelona; its funding comes from international venture capital funds including Nauta Capital, Balderton Capital and Spinnaker.

Here is the link to the press release regarding SYCTL's acquisition of SOE


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012election; agenda; agenda21; al; az; baldertoncapital; ballotsafe; barcelona; blackboxvoting; bloodofglobaltyrants; bloodofnwo; bloodoftyrants; ca; clarity; clarityelections; co; corruption; donttreadonme; election; election2012; electionfraud; electionresults; elections; fascism; florida; fraud; georgesoros; globaltyranny; internetvotingfirm; lping; militaryballots; militaryvotes; moevs; nautacapital; nobama2012; nwofascism; obama; progressivism; scytl; sicsempertyrannis; smearfinancier; soe; soesoftware; software; soros; spain; spinnaker; tampa; trump; tyranny; un; voterfraud; votingfirm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: STARWISE
FOREIGN COMPANY BUYS U.S. ELECTION RESULTS REPORTING FIRM---- Another article about this
21 posted on 01/19/2012 6:33:54 AM PST by tutstar (Want pings to Aaron Klein articles and OWS nonsense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I note the writer is Bev Harris — would this be the same Bev Harris celebrated by DU and ridiculed and despised by FR a few years ago? Just askin’ . . .


22 posted on 01/19/2012 7:27:51 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
I googled Soros and SCYTL. It looks like they attend the same invitation only events. Moldova ICT SUMMIT 2011 May 18, 2011 at 9:00 AM - May 19, 2011 at 6:00 PM LEOGRAND CONVENTION CENTER, Chişinău http://moldovaictsummit.md Moldova ICT Summit 2011 is an industry event, organized by National Association of Private ICT Companies in partnership with USAID Competitiveness Enhancement and Enterprise Development (CEED II) project supported by Endava, Microsoft Moldova, Moldcell, HP, Center for Egovernance, Soros Foundation Moldova, Regional Competitiveness Initiative, IBM Romania, Intel,Moldtelecom, Scytl, Qsystems Global under the patronage of the Ministry of Information Technology and Communications. The Summit will focus on how to empower country development through information technology and build knowledge based economy, as well as discuss the key challenges for a vibrant development of the ICT industry. The event will get together over 1000 leaders of Moldovan ICT industry, regional ICT vendors, international professionals, donor organizations, domestic business customers, and Moldovan Government representatives. The Summit will have five major tracks: • e-Transformation & ICT Competitiveness • IT entrepreneurship • IT4Transparency • IT4Developers • IT4Business Event Owner: Ana Chirita (Executive Director at National Association of Private ICT Companies)
23 posted on 04/07/2012 3:46:13 PM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; Liz; Fedora

Ballotsafe ping


24 posted on 11/25/2020 5:26:06 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Thanks, good find from the archives.


25 posted on 11/25/2020 5:29:43 PM PST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

So how did so many states sign on for this, and why aren’t any running away screaming and finding new ways to get the elections done that IS reliable and transparent and verifiable? This is entirely up to the state legislatures, and the majority are GOP held. Once again, it is OUR fault if we allow it to continue.


26 posted on 11/25/2020 6:08:57 PM PST by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson