Skip to comments.Snopes Scrubs Article On Obama's Mama's Picture-Porn: Excluded From Wayback Machine (Marcy Moore/s)
Posted on 06/16/2012 6:37:09 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
It appears Snopes.com scrubbed their "report" on Obama's mom posing nude. When Snopes originally published their article they tagged the claim "undetermined" and then sometime later tagged it as "false" claiming the nude woman in the photos was Marcy Moore. Now Snopes pulled the article altogether and had the URL excluded from the Wayback Machine. Wonder why?
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Looks like a FAIL on the Marcy Moore slight of hand...
because snopes is just some liberal couple in an apt somewhere. I don’t know how they became the alleged internet rumor “experts”.....
Because Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.
They got in on the game early, when there wasn’t anywhere else to direct the gullible to everytime they started spouting off about the latest stupid email they got. So, they became “branded”, and that is hard to ever reverse.
Photos at site censored but clearly these are not photos of Marcy Moore
Uh, call from 0bamao?
Visit from 0bamao friends?
Look at eyebrows, that’s all I’m saying...
Sigh....the article in question was under the Snopes Sections....Fauxtography....Risque Business.
If you go there now, when you try to open the “Risque Business” section you find this announcement....
“The article you have attempted to access is temporarily unavailable because Internet filters have flagged it as containing material deemed to be pornographic or sexually explicit and have blocked access to our site on that basis. We are attempting to resolve the issue and get the material back online as soon as we can.”
So this entire section is now closed, not just the article on Obama’s mother.
I remember the photo, which appeared here back during the 2008 election campaign. Anybody still got it?
Marcy Moore has a mole on her forehead that Stanley Ann Obummer does not have. Pretty easy to figure out the difference.
Sorry, the article links to another one, which shows some of the photos here:
Add to this the fact that Frank Marshall Davis was a porn freak and a self-confessed child molester, and it all ties in—though no absolute proof, of course.
The new pictures in the video at WMD have convinced me it is not Marcy Moore. She has very visible moles on her face that are not present in the photos claimed to be Stanley Ann.
I am not convinced the photos are SAD. The nose appears different.
But in any case the new photos are definitely now Moore.
Photos shown were in Frank Marshall Davis’s home, Obama’s real father. To much cover up claiming Obama Sr. was the father to have that evidence floating about.
AND, FMD was a photographer with access to a developing lab and the knowledge to use it. You could not send photos like that to the corner drug store without drawing the attention of the police.
At the link the author asks “What pregnant woman would pose for a photo like that?” (paraphrasing) Well, if the photos were taken just after Thanksgiving, she would have only been weeks pregnant, at the most, and may not even have known it yet. This happened in an era before EPT, and most women were not even diagnosed until they were 3 months along.
What is there in the photos that indicates the year they were taken.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.