Posted on 06/28/2012 8:18:24 AM PDT by The Looking Spoon
I admit, "respect" is a term used very loosely here.
I was perpetually pessimistic about ObamaCare's reversal...but I wasn't watching the other hand. I would have NEVER guessed who the law's savior would be...
Roberts doesn’t deserve an ounce of respect.
That alone should have disqualified him from consideration. I trust no lawyer or Judge who spent time in an ivy league school.
Not "Famous" But Infamous for this decision.
A Coward of the First order.
P.S. Why would he agree to a Tax anyway!?! Taxes are bad, you think a so called Republican would know That!
So, who was happy or even thrilled when Harriet Myers stepped down as the nominee for the high court and Roberts was announced as the new nominee replacement? Do you still have your glee?
"Hey Justice John, Nancy is really great in bed isn't she, and her pictures of you in bed with her are ready to go on You Tube if you don't vote for us!"
Roberts is an opportunist.
I feel like throwing up.
RESPECT is earned; why is Robert due any?
Once this supply drys up, Walmart will ration butt wipe on Thursdays.
I have BO RESPECT for roberts.
I truly hope that his decision will further damage obama down the road. I will not watch the traitor-n-chief when he pimps out to trumpet his victory.
The only thing that can protect us now is the election, and the Constitution was supposed to prevent our rights being up for grabs with every election cycle.
The only other possibility is that the states that sued nullify the act on their territory and threaten to arrest any Federal official who tries to enforce it.
Make Zero try to send in the army.
The impeachment of the Gang of Five needs to become an election issue.
It’s not the decision I wanted, but their might be an upside.
The court has basically said that if we want freedom, we need to elect people who stand for freedom. The democrats won this battle, but it might put them closer to losing the war.
Who would have though Kennedy would have the best dissent too!
you know what is so excruciatingly infuriating is that the news stories all said how Roberts was trying to enhance his reputation by not having 5-4 decisions.
I meant NO respect.
It is no longer government “by the people for the people”, it is government by the gov for the gov. This is a travesty. Roberts is a traitorous jackass!
and to think that we thought Kennedy was the one to worry about.
Now where are the idiots who claimed Roberts traded his "wrong" vote on SB1070 for someone else's "right" vote on this?
Not much associated with the Bush family is.
Roberts called Obama a liar.
Obama repeatedly insisted the mandate was not a tax. Roberts says, oh yes it is.
Congress can impose taxes. Congress can also repeal them. We elect congress.
Roberts also essentially said Congress and the President are free to pass stupid laws. Money quote from his opinion:
We do not consider whether the Act embodies sound policies. That judgment is entrusted to the Nations elected leaders. We ask only whether Congress has the power under the Constitution to enact the challenged provisions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.