Posted on 07/02/2012 5:01:56 PM PDT by ElIguana
A man who claims to be a TSA supervisor called into the Alex Jones Show and dropped this bombshell. Calling himself "Rob" to shield his actual identity, the caller told Jones that the TSA is intentionally directing its staff to not only hire applicants who have criminal records, exhibit violent tendencies and have a history of psychopathic behavior; but the agency is actually moving these people to the front of the pack.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativeamericaonline.blogspot.com ...
They are intentionally hiring mainly Eric Holder’s people, so yes.
Are blogs intentionally ripping off videos to get hits?
Maybe not all, but YOU sure are.
Here’s the stolen video you referenced:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLIBf-BsGmw&feature=player_embedded
The hiring agreement that the Port of Los Angeles signed last year, dictated that a certain percentage of the jobs go to people with a criminal record, who would otherwise have trouble finding employment. So, it shouldn’t surprise anyone that the TSA are doing the same thing.
It sounds perfectly plausible for naziesque types like Holder and Janet Napolitano. Who better to enforce this gestapo crap than psychopaths?
I think the job is self-selecting for psychopaths.
Nearly 1 in 4 TSA agents are ex-military.
http://www.tsa.gov/who_we_are/workforce/index.shtm
There are a few bad apples - just as there are in any large group.
The main issues with TSA are not the fault of the agents. It’s the system. It’s the leadership. Most of whom have never spent 15 minutes working on the floor of an airport.
I think the job is self-selecting for psychopaths.
________________________
The one character I know who worked for TSA at PIT was a real loose cannon.
But a lot of people need the job, and standing out at the airport day after day, doing the enhanced gropings and rummaging through travelers’ underwear and socks day after day has to drive a lot of people batty.
The fact is that TSA pays more and wants people to “respect its authoritay”, makes it hard for people to give it up, even though its a low level mundane task.
Enough to drive even some sane folks over the edge.
It would be best to turn this back over to the private sector, where there is a bit more of a turnover and the staff doesn’t have the same attitude.
“So, it shouldn’t surprise anyone that the TSA are doing the same thing.”
Boy, I hope they aren’t. That would be like mandating that a certain percentage of bank guards have criminal records.
If he REALLY wants to help America by disclosing this, he needs to call into Rush AND appear on Fox News - many, many millions (including some important conservatives) would hear it, rather than on the Alex Jones Show.
I read that Holder is hitting up on employers for racism when they reject people with criminal records for jobs. He’s claiming it discriminates against Black men.
So, this policy of hiring criminals does not surprise me. We are so screwed.
What do you think goes on at our ports that the government is mandating that criminals be given jobs there? It’s the same thing.
I forgot to mention that it is not just criminals that are part of the hiring equation at the port of Los Angeles. They also require a certain percentage of the hires come from the local neighborhood, which means, “illegals”, because that is who lives in that neighborhood.
Your overall profile doesn’t fit ATLANTA airport. Mostly minorities (blacks) and a few token whites and immigrants, all with not two cents worth a brains to rub between them.
I was trying to look up the articles about the port agreement that was signed in Los Angeles and couldn’t find the originals, that explained the breakdown of what exactly the terms of the agreement meant.
What I did find is that they have reserved 10% of the jobs for local, “disadvantaged workers”, which they describe as felons and single mothers. I found that not only did they reserve the jobs at the Port of Los Angeles, but at other ports in CA as well as other projects which were receiving federal stimulus money, such as expansion of MLK hospital.
I’m willing to bet that employing “disadvantaged” workers is a federal mandate. Remember, a “disadvantaged worker can also be an “illegal worker”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.