Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was the Bagram 747 Crash a Terrorist Drone/UAV Attack in the Runway Kill Zone (RKZ)?
Runway Kill Zone (blog) ^ | May 2, 2013 | 2branta

Posted on 05/02/2013 8:45:09 AM PDT by Seizethecarp

The horrific crash of a 747-400 at Bagram (here) has yet to be fully investigated and claims are already being made that it was a stall caused by a loose cargo that caused tail of the aircraft to drop and the nose to rise depriving the wings of lift.

Maybe.

The Bagram 747 crash has many similarities to the even more horrific crash of AWACS flight Yukla-27, (here) which was caused by the aircraft striking at least two Canada Geese in the Runway Kill Zone (RKZ) as discussed on an earlier post on this blog (here).

Terrorists familiar with the vulnerability of large jet airliners in the RKZ could produce a nearly identical or very similar crash profile to the Bagram event. They could do this by mining the Bagram runway with autonomous GPS-guided multi-copters placed exactly where they would collide with each jet turbine as the 747-400 passed through the RKZ of the Bagram runway.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: adjustyourmeds; bagram747; blog; blogfail; blogpimp; blogpimper; blogpimping; blogpimpoffmeds; choochookachoo; coocooforcocoapuffs; dontleaveyourdayjob; drone; dumbblog; dumbestthreadever; epicblogfail; epicfail; fail; isthisajoke; joke; justdumb; kook; kookoo; loserblog; notevenclose; nut; nutbag; nutbagconspiracy; nuts; offyourmeds; planecrash; runwaykillzone; singlekook; somuchepicfail; somuchfail; somuchkook; stayathomekook; thorozinedrip; tinfoilhat; turnedmeintoanewt; uggghhh; unngghh; upyourmeds; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last
Connecting possible dots. Avoiding "failure of imagination."
1 posted on 05/02/2013 8:45:09 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
Occam's razor says it was a cargo-shift.
2 posted on 05/02/2013 8:46:32 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to behead anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

There’s probably enough footage of this to be able to say yes or no.


3 posted on 05/02/2013 8:46:56 AM PDT by stuartcr ("I have habits that are older than the people telling me they're bad for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

No, it looks like a cargo shift..


4 posted on 05/02/2013 8:48:26 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Constitution? What Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

ping


5 posted on 05/02/2013 8:48:26 AM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of oppression and Democrats use them. Gun confiscation enables tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

One would expect some visual indications from engines not producing thrust. While the film makes it hard to see the nose attitude of the plane it was definitely going slow, the wing rolled left slightly and then rapidly to the right as the nose dropped. Cargo shift or, improper placement/weight and balance look more probable.


6 posted on 05/02/2013 8:51:46 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

AR-15 in the trunk of the plane obviously....sheesh. They had the guys on live when cargo shift was mentioned before the 747 hit the earth.

It even LOOKS like cargo shift....happened just like this in the 90s in FL.


7 posted on 05/02/2013 8:52:38 AM PDT by DCBryan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

They could do this by mining the Bagram runway with autonomous GPS-guided multi-copters placed exactly where they would collide with each jet turbine as the 747-400 passed through the RKZ of the Bagram runway.

What a nut to claim that happened. What the video. There was no engine failure.

Crash: National Air Cargo B744 at Bagram on Apr 29th 2013, lost height shortly after takeoff
http://avherald.com/h?article=46183bb4&opt=0


8 posted on 05/02/2013 8:52:52 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

If you watch the video is pretty obvious they were climbing at too steep of an angle and the plane simply stalled.


9 posted on 05/02/2013 8:54:20 AM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Not only was it not terrorist, I doubt it was even cargo-shift. It has the look of simple (and I might add classic) steep climb stall. Once the aircraft stalled, clearly the nose dropped (as it is supposed to do) and the pilot appeared to be regaining control. Another 12-1500 feet of altitude and it might have been the most impressive ‘buzzing’ of the field ever recorded.

And yes, this exact type of accident has happened before. When you get that much mass rotating that quickly, Mr. Newton takes over and makes it continue to rotate even as the pilot commands it to stop. As some point airspeed diminishes below stalling speed, and you become a passenger until the nose drops and airspeed is regained. Hopefully you don’t run out of altitude before that happens.


10 posted on 05/02/2013 8:56:00 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney
That makes all the more likely that it was an invisible drone sent out from a grassy knoll by the CIA at the behest of the Trilateral Commission.
11 posted on 05/02/2013 8:56:02 AM PDT by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Classic cargo shift to the tail, causing the aircraft to pitch up then stall. The pilot did an incredible job of trying to save it in it's final seconds although at that point it was falling like a rock with no lift.

Were there any locals on that ground crew who loaded the aircraft? Were maximum capacity limits ignored? It's hard to watch that dashcam video, and I found that the puppy whimpering then the driver chuckling kind of odd, given the enormity of what just happened. Horrible.

12 posted on 05/02/2013 9:00:51 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

yes


13 posted on 05/02/2013 9:02:29 AM PDT by stuartcr ("I have habits that are older than the people telling me they're bad for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Party_Animal

Exactly, causing an engine flame-out with invisible flames...


14 posted on 05/02/2013 9:02:44 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

From the video I’ve seen it looks like an extremely high angle of ascent combined with a possible cargo shift. There was no smoke or obvious damage to the plane before it crashed.


15 posted on 05/02/2013 9:04:42 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

I see that all but 1 of the 7 killed were from here in Michigan. Apparently the company is based at Willow run.


16 posted on 05/02/2013 9:08:57 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Willow Run? Was it a Kallita bird?


17 posted on 05/02/2013 9:11:17 AM PDT by cardinal4 (Constitution? What Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No. Next question.


18 posted on 05/02/2013 9:12:36 AM PDT by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

According to a listener on frequency the crew reported the aircraft stalled due to a possible load shift.


19 posted on 05/02/2013 9:13:03 AM PDT by TSgt (More Scott Roeders and fewer Tillers and Gosnells)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
This is the second time you've posted a drone-takes-down-plane theory with the exact same comment.

Smells like a blog pimp to me!


20 posted on 05/02/2013 9:15:12 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

I think you meant that for the original poster.


21 posted on 05/02/2013 9:17:20 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to behead anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Clearly load shift.

Way too much conspiracy BS lately.


22 posted on 05/02/2013 9:22:43 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (We have No Opposition to Obama's Socialist Agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Great link ... thanks for that.


23 posted on 05/02/2013 9:24:54 AM PDT by Fast Moving Angel (A moral wrong is not a civil right: No religious sanction of an irreligious act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

Another 12-1500 feet of altitude and it might have been the most impressive ‘buzzing’ of the field ever recorded.

Maybe in a Cessna 150 but more like 5,000’ in a 747


24 posted on 05/02/2013 9:29:53 AM PDT by newbolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

It’s a stall.

Something like this happened to a small commuter jet a few years back, if I remember correctly.

The cause of that commuter accident was incorrect center-of-gravity loading.

I’m betting it’s the same thing here.

And - perhaps Boeing changed the design, but I do not remember 747-400 having the rather normal nose profile that I think I’m seeing in that movie (not that the type of plane matters...if one Obamas up the CG, any plane will perform like liberal economists do).


25 posted on 05/02/2013 9:38:21 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

National Air Cargo is located in Orchard Park, NY a suburb of Buffalo. My son used to work for the company.


26 posted on 05/02/2013 9:48:58 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’ve also thought that maybe the practice is for jets departing that base to take off at a steep angle to avoid possible fire from the ground and in this case the crew just stalled the thing. I used to worry about that happening whenever my family flew out of Ontario or Burbank in SoCal.


27 posted on 05/02/2013 9:49:55 AM PDT by MeganC (You can take my gun when you can grab it with your cold, dead fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

“If you watch the video is pretty obvious they were climbing at too steep of an angle and the plane simply stalled.”

Maybe. Maybe not so obvious.

I have watched a lot of take-offs and take-off video and it is very hard to assess from the ground at the end of a runway the angle of ascent of a jetliner.

The four engines on the 747-400 are extremely powerful and all jets taking off from Bagram depart at a high angle of ascent to avoid small arms and RPG fire.

Two things have been noted by expert observers about this stall:

1. The aircraft appears to have lost thrust and with resulting loss of airspeed at a rate greater than could be accounted for only by a stall caused by too high an attack angle.

2. The undercarriage appears to have been fully extended at the time of the crash when it would have been expected to have been fully or at least partially retracted a 1,200 feet that the aircraft is estimated to have attained prior to the plunge. This could indicate that an engine thrust malfunction occurred at or shortly after the “go-no go” point on the runway called V1 was passed and pilots are trained (drilled) to “take the problem into the air.”

Attempting to abort a take-off after V1 speed is attained will far more likely result in going off the end of the runway with loss of the aircraft and loss of life on the plane and on the ground. This is why the zone between V1 and VR (rotation for lift-off) has been called “The Runway Kill Zone” on the blog of that name. V1-VR is a zone where terrorists an knock out one or more engines using GPS guided drones and place the pilots in a situation that they cannot recover from.

The sad story of AWACS flight Yukla 27, which hit at least two Canada Geese in the runway kill zone (RKZ) can now be reverse-engineered by terrorists, as explained on the RKZ blog.

I don’t claim that the Bagram 747 crash was caused by terrorists, but, IMO, the drone technology now exists for terrorists to replicate this crash intentionally and steps must be taken to identify the runway kill zone (RKZ) for all flights protect all airfields from GPS-guided drone attacks in the RKZ.

The public needs to be alert to all suspicious drone activities near airports (no, not RC model enthusiasts at known model airfields even if near airports) and to report them to authorities.


28 posted on 05/02/2013 9:51:33 AM PDT by Seizethecarp ((Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Clearly cargo shift to the rear.

Once that occurs at takeoff there is no maneuver sufficient to correct from that pitch up, tail down stall.

You don't have sufficient speed, thrust, or altitude to regain control.

29 posted on 05/02/2013 9:52:38 AM PDT by G Larry (Darkness Hates the Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents

This story says Florida based company then in the next paragraph says its based at Willow run.

http://www.annarbor.com/news/ypsilanti/ypsilanti-man-among-7-killed-in-afghan-crash/

Its obviously a global company so I’m guessing this particular plane or crew were Michigan based


30 posted on 05/02/2013 9:54:14 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: newbolt

“but more like 5,000’ in a 747”

Maybe, but the plane has rolled wings level and nose is only about 25-30 degrees down. He had obviously regained some aerodynamic control, but at that point gravity was still exceeding lift. My only point was I think the aircraft was entirely flyable, give sufficient altitude to recover.


31 posted on 05/02/2013 9:54:22 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“There was no engine failure.”

I see a loss of thrust. It has been pointed out that the fact that the landing gear was still extended on impact points to possible recognition by the crew of a problem almost immediately after take-off that interrupted retraction of the gear, which should have been well underway at 1,200 feet, according to some claimed expert comments.


32 posted on 05/02/2013 9:54:28 AM PDT by Seizethecarp ((Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

The video on the TV news last night was awsome but so deadly to see such a huge aircraft fall out of the sky. Another sad day for families of the dead crew.


33 posted on 05/02/2013 9:55:54 AM PDT by mohresearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
I’ve also thought that maybe the practice is for jets departing that base to take off at a steep angle to avoid possible fire from the ground and in this case the crew just stalled the thing.

The steep takeoff angle could have contributed to a load-shift. The load may not have shifted on a normal takeoff.

34 posted on 05/02/2013 9:57:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to behead anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

“They had the guys on live when cargo shift was mentioned before the 747 hit the earth.”

Did they? That is a claim. A lot of what is reported right after an incident turns out to be bogus, as we just saw in Boston. I will await the cockpit recorder.

The Runway Kill Zone blog is not claiming that this event WAS a terrorist attack, but only that a terrorist could intentionally achieve a similar result. Note that as few as two Canada Geese caused a similar stall and crash of an AWACS in Alaska, as explained and linked to on the blog.


35 posted on 05/02/2013 9:57:54 AM PDT by Seizethecarp ((Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Indeed. Especially as the cargo was vehicles. Someone screwed up on the tie-downs, either not properly attached, or inadequate for the load. Something slipped, connectors snapped, and instant major CG shift in the most dangerous portion of the flight. . .


36 posted on 05/02/2013 10:00:57 AM PDT by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border. I **DARE** you to cross it. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Check the National Air Cargo website. http://www.nationalaircargo.com/default.aspx


37 posted on 05/02/2013 10:04:50 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

I see a loss of lift. That is different than a loss of thrust.


38 posted on 05/02/2013 10:09:04 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
It certainly looked like a stall, although that may have been exaggerated by the camera angle.
39 posted on 05/02/2013 10:16:05 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
except the video soundtrack captures the roar of the engines spooled up to the max. Furthermore an engine taken out by something in the compressor would be sending out bursts of flame and smoke in profuse quantity, especially if it was a full power (as it would be, especially at that airport). None of that appears in the vid.

This accident probably left the black boxes fully recoverable, so real data should be available to the accident investigators soon. No need to pander to knee-jerk conspiracy theorists about hypothetical GPS drone attacks.

The typical consumer grade quadcopter probably doesn't have enough mass to constitute a serious threat anyway. I bet a golden BB attack would have a higher probability of success.

40 posted on 05/02/2013 10:16:46 AM PDT by no-s (when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

“It’s a stall.”

But what caused the stall?

1. nose of plane too high?
2. loss of thrust?
3. cargo shift
4. loss of control of control surfaces?
5. improper flapp settings?

The point of the blog post is that terrorist can intentionally cause a stall nearly identical to the one that occurred at Bagram, without claiming that this is what happened there.


41 posted on 05/02/2013 10:24:05 AM PDT by Seizethecarp ((Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

“According to a listener on frequency the crew reported the aircraft stalled due to a possible load shift.”

That is the claim. Many claims at the time of an accident don’t prove to be true.

The point of the blog is not that this was NOT caused by cargo shift, but that a similar stall could be achieved by use of GPS-guided drones place to mine the Bagram runway in the V1-VR Runway Kill Zone (RKZ).


42 posted on 05/02/2013 10:27:02 AM PDT by Seizethecarp ((Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: thackney
I agree. This looks like a stall caused by loss of lift. One of my favorite sayings: "When you are in Arizona and you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras."

This is a cargo plane.

It is climbing out at a very steep angle in a hostile zone.

The footage to me looks clearly like a cargo shift.

The plane stands on its tail, decelerates rapidly and departs from controlled flight to begin that settling crash into the ground that looks completely characteristic to me.

43 posted on 05/02/2013 10:36:12 AM PDT by rlmorel ("We'll drink to good health for them that have it coming." Boss Spearman in Open Range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: no-s

“Furthermore an engine taken out by something in the compressor would be sending out bursts of flame and smoke in profuse quantity, especially if it was a full power (as it would be, especially at that airport).”

Good point.

“No need to pander to knee-jerk conspiracy theorists about hypothetical GPS drone attacks.”

The Runway Kill Zone blog does not claim that this crash WAS caused by terrorists. The blog attempts to educate officials and the public to the emerging threat posed by terrorists who can now reverse-engineer bird-strike type engine failures in the V1-VR “kill zone” which would look a lot like this crash profile.

“The typical consumer grade quadcopter probably doesn’t have enough mass to constitute a serious threat anyway.”

As pointed out up-thread, tiny kestrel birds brought down 747!

Here are the stats on the kestrel:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Kestrel

Common Kestrels measure 32–39 cm (13–15 in) from head to tail, with a wingspan of 65–82 cm (26–32 in). Females are noticeably larger, with the adult male weighing 136-252 g (c,5-9 oz), around 155 g (around 5.5 oz) on average; the adult female weighs 154-314 g (about 5.5-11 oz), around 184 g (around 6.5 oz) on average.


44 posted on 05/02/2013 10:41:57 AM PDT by Seizethecarp ((Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Is runway kill blog yours?


45 posted on 05/02/2013 10:43:53 AM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name
steep climb stall

That is what a cargo shift causes.

When you get that much mass rotating that quickly, Mr. Newton takes over and makes it continue to rotate even as the pilot commands it to stop

Not unless you are below controllable airspeed. First of all during climb out you aren't 'rotating' at all. That happened just as the plane lifted off. By the time you are at a thousand feed there has not been any rotation for a while.... unless you command one, lose engine power, of your CG moves aft suddenly (cargo shift). Planes are controllable. Momentum is pretty easy to overcome as long as air is moving over your control surfaces. Once that stops momentum is only one of your many worries :P
46 posted on 05/02/2013 10:49:05 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lx

Yes it is his. He seems to be dedicated to giving stupid terrorist information about how to bring down planes. Lose lips sink ships.


47 posted on 05/02/2013 10:57:18 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Lx

“Is runway kill blog yours?”

Yes, I am “2branta”...

I went to the US Secret Service in 2006 with this concept and they told me to “get my meds adjusted.”

I then went to the Air Force director of research...the top guy...and he thanked me for bringing this attack vector to his attention and complimented my patriotism. He also pointedly told me that he had forwarded the Runway Kill Zone concept to the Air Force One group commander.

I asked this Air Force research director whether I should keep this concept confidential and he said all of the elements are out there in the public so there was nothing secret about it.


48 posted on 05/02/2013 11:11:59 AM PDT by Seizethecarp ((Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Interesting. WHen I was at Mosul, Balad, and Bagram, we had drone strikes since I was UAV detatchment commander. 2 Ravens and a Shadow.

Raven 1 hit a UH60 that dropped into UAV AOA unauthorized. Nice dent. Soiled pants of pilot and crew. Aircraft grounded until repaired.

Raven 2 hit a Airbus....nice dent. Airbus grounded 24 hours for inspection.

Shadow hit by IL 76. BIG DENT. Grounded airplane that got into our AO.

All drone strikes were pilots not following NOTAMS or leaving their airspace into ours.

Mini copters hitting a 747 ain’t going to bring it down. Much less probable than durka durka with a Mosin Nagant with 100 year old ammo (golden bb).

Nice Blogpimping though....our company blocks all spam and blogs though so I couldnt get on it.


49 posted on 05/02/2013 11:31:06 AM PDT by DCBryan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

“That is what a cargo shift causes.”

If the weight shift is not greater than aerodynamic force - stick forward to maintain airspeed, flight normal.

If the weight shift is greater than can be aerodynamically controlled (stick forward won’t prevent continued nose rotation)- nose won’t drop when stall is reached.

Airplane reaches stall due to angle of attack, nose drops at stall and after sufficient altitude aircraft becomes controllable - normal ops. Exactly what the video shows, just without sufficient altitude to recover.


50 posted on 05/02/2013 11:39:24 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson