Posted on 08/07/2013 6:29:11 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
The following image is a composite created by scanning the WH LFBC using Xerox WorkCentre 7655 upside down using the automatic feeder. The resulting file was opened in Preview, the image rotated 180 degrees and printed to PDF. The resulting PDF was opened in preview, the layers unlocked and moved to the side. In addition, a close up of the signature was ‘blown up’ to show how the background layer, not surprisingly, has filled in some of the white that resulted from the separation of the background and foreground layers.
Note how for example the signature block is fully separated.
(Excerpt) Read more at nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com ...
Arpaio wants this before Congress. That is the route they are taking.
occams razor- that would be way too hard to do.
They simply cut and pasted a few other scanned BC’s.
Sherrif Joe’s posse even has a suspect in mind (and *sigh* no they havent revealed who yet)
With that kind of WHut insider connection, it wouldn’t be too far-fetched to have Xerox or Adobe programmers “update” their software to behave in the far-fetched manner required within limited circumstances. Someone needs have archived the software extant at the time of the original scan for the ostensibly-generating machine. At this point I wouldn’t trust company repository driver software not to have been similarly corrupted and back-dated. Such machines may automatically update their software via the Internet or via periodic company service packs, obliterating earlier software in those cases.
At least catching them in the fashion suggested by above would be as worthy as any Columbo episode!
HF
Puts things in context. And as you say, there are multiple duplicate pairs.
Just another "coincidence" (dismissive hand wave). /s
I’m not suggesting this as the means used for creating the forgery. I’m wondering if they were so desperate to overcome the analysis by Reed Hayes that they coordinated a “demonstration” that would try to say that the anomalies were put in there by this Xerox workstation. But others would have to also produce the same results - if Dr. Con really came up with movable signature and certification (for instance) and isn’t just lying about that. It would be risky for Dr. Con to lie about it, if somebody could try the same thing on their Xerox 7655 and prove it a lie. Are there a lot of these workstations out there? And how hard would it be to hack one?
That would make more sense than hacking individual machines. Anybody with programming knowledge know how a person would detect such a scheme if it happened?
“Before Congress” to what end?
What did Secretary of State Gale do in response?
Nothing. His attorney said Nebraska law doesn’t require the OCON to be lawful in order to effect the placement on the ballot. Bauer could have been sitting in jail, convicted of election fraud, and the fraudulent papers he submitted still have to be good enough to get Obama on the ballot.
I asked the attorney if he was going to refer the fraud to the AG’s office. First off, he acted like he hadn’t received Klayman’s letter. Then he said it wasn’t addressed to him, implying that he didn’t read it for that reason and isn’t responsible for acting on it. Then after he admitted that he had read it he said that the copy of the application form wasn’t for a letter of verification but for a certified copy - which is how a verification is requested, as was explained in Klayman’s letter. Then he said Bennett never requested the date (for instance) to be verified. When he had to admit that, then he said Nebraska doesn’t have to care what Arizona found out and the name was to go on the ballot anyway. That’s when I asked him if he was going to report the fraud to the AG, and he went all over the map talking about how there could be a birthday card with Obama’s name on it that proved those birth facts for Obama; he blew off that neither Obama nor Bauer could use a birthday card as a legal basis for swearing eligibility, since the determination of LEGAL birth facts would require an evidentiary hearing which has never been done.
In short, he blew off the whole thing as if it doesn’t matter. And he knew he’d get away with it because AG Bruning is just as crooked as the SOS’s office is. And the FBI (now anyway. During the Unabomber search they were checking out anybody named Nathan R so they visited us and were very diligent and earnest. Now they just give lazy, easily-debunked lies, as both I and the police officer knew. So did AG Bruning’s office, which also referred a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT to the SOS’s office which isn’t law enforcement.
IOW, they’re all acting as if they don’t know their heads from their rear ends. And with the way they’re acting nobody else can tell the difference either.
I received a background check because I reported this crime to the Lincoln Police Department. I got more scrutiny, for simply saying the evidence that is in my possession, than the guy who holds the nuclear football has ever legally gotten. A country this stupid wins the Darwin Award and will soon be going the way of the dodo bird.
There’s an interesting new development in the Alabama ballot challenge. As of August 1, the Secretary of State in Alabama, Beth Chapman, who is the defendant in the case to be heard before the Alabama Supreme Court, has resigned to take a private sector job. Alabama’s Govermor has appointed a new Secretary of State named Jim Bennett. I don’t think that anyone yet knows what his position is on Obama’s eligibility.
Beth Chapman had vigorously defended the position that Alabama law does not require or permit her to check presidential candidates’ eligibility.
Alabama has one of the most conservative Supreme Courts in the nation, no current Justice was appointed by a Democrat.
Beth Chapman was informed that the OCON she received was fraudulent. She didn’t have to “check a presidential candidate’s eligibility”; all she needed to know is that Onaka confirmed there are no legally-established birth facts for Obama, and that would tell her that the OCON swearing he was eligible has to be fraudulent. How is a SOS supposed to handle an election filing that he/she knows to be fraudulent? That is the real question here.
That is the long and the short of it. There is no "document" beyond what the WH created from bits and pieces of the digital data provided to them.
At best, the wh version can be called an "Abstract." Put on the thinking cap. Imagine you must register a used automobile, but do not have the original title, or a certified replacement. You repair to your trusty PC, turn on Photoshop and the scanner and create one from bits and pieces of information you found in the glove compartment, which may, or may not be accurate, cutting and pasting into scanned matrix from another title. Perhaps there's one or two things about the vehicle you do not wish the DMV to know. That's OK, just leave them out.
So you create a title. Try that on your DMV and see how far you get. In the BC case, there is no original document. So, they made one, and they have been caught.
Beth is gone now but she was not alone. 51 ( counting Washington D.C.) Chief Election Officials refused to intervene.
Thanks for the Ping.
Pathetic. Every one of them is an accessory to the crimes Obama has committed and is committing. Every one of them has broken the vow they made when they took the oath of office.
For the sake of ten righteous people in Sodom, the Lord would have spared Sodom and Gomorrah. They rightly became a sulfurous heap yet even they had a better ratio than the USA right now. I don’t know why the Lord hasn’t decimated us yet.
I remember looking at that. The two boxes are exact copies. Down to every pixel. That was a shock.
These people doing these tests with the zerox are the same scuzzbags that will defend an abortion in the ninth month. Believing anything they say is foolish.
Whores, pimps, Democrats, all the same to me.
“There is no chance that these boxes would be identical, unless one is a copy of the other, after in digital form.”
Check out this link from up-thread showing that the Xerox can duplicate image blocks for efficiency...but can make mistakes:
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/xerox-machines-change-documents-scanning/story?id=19895331
“Xerox Machines Change Documents After Scanning”
“The problem stems from a combination of compression level and resolution setting,” Tse wrote. “The Xerox design utilizes the recognized industry standard JBIG2 compressor which creates extremely small file sizes with good image quality, but with inherent tradeoffs under low resolution and quality settings.”
Kriesel said that it’s more than just a resolution problem, but that JBIG2 actually changes the numbers in the scanned image. He explained that the document is segmented into discrete sections and that the WorkCentre machine compares each section to a library of stored patches. “You only need to save a representative patch,” he said. “If a section looks like the number 8, then it gets replaced by the representative 8 patch.”
Unfortunately, replacing each section with representative patches can result in errors. Kriesel documented some of these changes in his blog. Some models of the Workcentre machines consistently make the same substitution errors, for example replacing the same 6s with the same 8s. Others models make arbitrary number substitutions that are not consistent each time the machine scans a document.
I remember you getting the printed reports. They started to screw with the data back then.
I read today that the IRS is still screwing with Tea Party groups. And then our President has a news conference about data snooping that his people are “not” doing.
This government has lost its way, It’s rotten to its core. The communist thug at 1600 Penn is no different than a South American Despot. He and all his communist friends .... Are sleazy arrogant punks.
Thanks for the Ping, Butter’.
This guy is a Xerox composite.
With Slick Willie the muck slid off on the Teflon, with this guy if ‘he’ gets creased, they print a new one.
The very first thing that should have changed between the 2008 election and the 2012 election is the majority of the states have laws which say that whoever a major political party nominates is automatically cleared for the state’s ballot. The state government really has little to no say.
What that has meant is that Nancy Pelosi, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Michael Steele and Reince Preibus alone are responsible for vetting candidates for the presidency.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.