Posted on 08/14/2013 3:18:00 PM PDT by Whenifhow
“Clearly, any family may be visited by federally paid agents for almost any reason.”
According to an Obamacare provision millions of Americans will be targeted.
The Health and Human Services’ website states that your family will be targeted if you fall under the “high-risk” categories below:
Families where mom is not yet 21. Families where someone is a tobacco user. Families where children have low student achievement, developmental delays, or disabilities. Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States.
There is no reference to Medicaid being the determinant for a family to be “eligible.”
In 2011, the HHS announced $224 million will be given to support evidence-based home visiting programs to “help parents and children.” Individuals from the state will implement these leveraging strategies to “enhance program sustainability.”
Constitutional attorney and author Kent Masterson Brown states,
“This is not a “voluntary” program. The eligible entity receiving the grant for performing the home visits is to identify the individuals to be visited and intervene so as to meet the improvement benchmarks. A homeschooling family, for instance, may be subject to “intervention” in “school readiness” and “social-emotional developmental indicators.” A farm family may be subject to “intervention” in order to “prevent child injuries.” The sky is the limit.
Although the Obama administration would claim the provision applies only to Medicaid families, the new statute, by its own definition, has no such limitation. Intervention may be with any family for any reason. It may also result in the child or children being required to go to certain schools or taking certain medications and vaccines and even having more limited – or no – interaction with parents. The federal government will now set the standards for raising children and will enforce them by home visits.”
Part of the program will require massive data collecting of private information including all sources of income and the amount gathered from each source.
A manual called Child Neglect: A Guide for Prevention, Assessment, and Intervention includes firearms as potential safety hazard and will require inspectors to verify safety compliance and record each inspection into a database.
Last session South Carolina Rep. Bill Chumley introduced a bill, H.3101 that would nullify certain provisions of Obamacare. The bill would give the state attorney general the authority to authorize law enforcement to arrest federal agents for trespassing. It would make forced home inspections under Obamacare illegal in South Carolina. It passed in the House but died in the senate.
Kent Brown and Rep. Rick Quinn discuss “forced” home inspections under Obamacare in the video below.
Yeah, I got my own audit of $13,000 annual income. Owe $500, not enough to fight. But seriously, they are auditing a basic return of $13,000? So much more big fish to fry, but nope... here I sit with my $500 bill.
Do you realize the ironic way that Seven of Nine connects to Obama?
Obama was facing Jack Ryan in the Senate Race and he was married to the actress who played Seven of Nine. So apparently Jack liked the swinger club and that came out in the SEALED divorce records and so *somehow* Obama came across those records and once Obama got the records, Ryan dropped out of the race.
So Seven of Nine was involved in how Obama became President.
And don’t forget boys & girls - the House and Senate don’t have to have Obamacare. And what happened when that news came out? Can you say, ‘rodeo clown’? I knew you could. And then there’s that little bit about the NSA monitoring every cell phone, email, web click, and GPSing us at will via vehicles. And what happened when we found out about that? Hmmm... can’t think of anything too spectacular in terms of response.
Thanks a f-ing lot John Roberts.
Seriously.
TigersEye pointed to the below link. It’s very bureaucratic language, but there may be some smoke there.
The purpose of the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) Competitive Grant program is to award Development Grants to States that currently have modest home visiting programs and want to build on existing efforts. Successful applicants will sufficiently demonstrate the capacity to expand or enhance their evidence-based home visiting programs. The funding provided will build on the formula funding already provided to States and territories to support the quality implementation of home visiting programs. Additionally, this funding opportunity will continue the program’s emphasis on rigorous research by grounding the proposed work in relevant empirical literature, and by including requirements to evaluate work proposed under this grant. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2012, approximately $12,000,000 will be available to support competitive Development Grants to eligible States and jurisdictions under the MIECHV program. $125,000,000 will be awarded on a formula basis to grantees funded under HRSA-11-187 for the MIECHV program. Successful applicants will be awarded FY 2012 competitive Development Grant funds, in addition to the FY2012 MIECHV formula based funds. Priority for Serving High-Risk Populations and Programmatic Areas of Emphasis As directed in the legislation , successful applicants will give priority to providing services to the following populations: a) Eligible families who reside in communities in need of such services, as identified in the statewide needs assessment required under subsection (b)(1)(A). b) Low-income eligible families. c) Eligible families who are pregnant women who have not attained age 21. d) Eligible families that have a history of child abuse or neglect or have had interactions with child welfare services. e) Eligible families that have a history of substance abuse or need substance abuse treatment. f) Eligible families that have users of tobacco products in the home. g) Eligible families that are or have children with low student achievement. h) Eligible families with children with developmental delays or disabilities. i) Eligible families who, or that include individuals who, are serving or formerly served in the Armed Forces, including such families that have members of the Armed Forces who have had multiple deployments outside of the United States.” In addition, the Health Resources and Service Administration (HRSA) and the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) have identified the following programmatic areas of emphasis. Applicants may propose to address one or more of these areas in response to this funding opportunity announcement: o Emphasis 1: Improvements in maternal, child, and family health o Emphasis 2: Effective implementation and expansion of evidence-based home visiting programs or systems with fidelity to the evidence-based model selected o Emphasis 3: Development of statewide or multi-State home visiting programs o Emphasis 4: Development of comprehensive early childhood systems that span the prenatal-through-age-eight continuum o Emphasis 5: Outreach to high-risk and hard-to-engage populations o Emphasis 6: Development of a family-centered approach to home visiting o Emphasis 7: Outreach to families in rural or frontier areas o Emphasis 8: The development of fiscal leveraging strategies to enhance program sustainability For a more detailed description of each area of emphasis, please see Appendix A: MIECHV Programmatic Emphasis Areas.
If they show up at my door, it won’t be pretty.
but what do you do about their car they drove in on?
- - - - - - -
Junk pit on an abandoned farm? I know of several.
How is that “hopey-changey” thing working out for you America?
- - - - - -
To vary a cat meme. I don’t do “hopey-changey”...I do “ouchy-bleedy”.
“Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States.”
Need a secret undisclosed location?
//because I am a trekkie nerd girl, LOL//
I love you. Seriously, but not in that way. I’m a trekkie nerd girl as well.
I think a lot of these contractors are going to ‘reach out’ and pull back a stump.
When they come to your door, tell them that before you let them into your house, you need to verify their identities. Then immediately pull out a digital recorder.
Ask for whatever “official identification” they might have — copy down name, and company name and address.
Ask them for their company location, phone number, and name of their supervisor. If you have a smart phone, use google to see of the phone number is listed. Call the company and ask for the visitors by name, and then ask to speak with the supervisor. You can ask the supervisor why they sent the visitors out to see you.
Then ask to see their driver’s license with their address — after all, they have yours. I predict 99% of these yahoos will then discover that they need to be elsewhere. Note that at no point have you made a “threat” against them.
If deputies show up later, you can always claim that you are just being “careful”. If they persist, then bring out a second digital recorder, and start the same procedure with them — identity, what complaint they are investigating, who made the complaint, probable cause, warrant, ...
“If I’m going to pass this on to interested parties, I will not pass along tinfoil.”
Quite frankly, tin foil is the new truth. I don’t pay attention to anything anymore if it doesn’t come to me through the Nut Job Conspiracy ping list. The rest - the “official story” - is largely government info releases laundered through a propaganda machine posing as a free press, and is no more often true these days than the wildest sounding “conspiracy theory.”
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obomacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/
It's important to read what others are saying. We are not alone....We are Americans, and we don't take no crap! We are beginning to sound like the American men and women who fought against the British soldiers during the Revolutionary War...God bless our resolve to save our country from evil and tyranny!
Are these door to door salesmen a part of obozo’s Acorn group or something like it? Are they recruiting young punks to go snooping, or whatever? Or is this the latest version of young people selling magazines door to door? This is worth checking out...we need to know WHO they are, and what their real INTENTIONS are, and if they are working for obozo.
Ping
FR thread: The Public Servant Questionaire (For Your Protection!)
Solution - shoot the commies if they try to enter your home. Either you defend yourself or the country perishes. It’s that simple.
Huh?
They don't want your daughters!
Like in Sodom, at Lot's door, they wanted the MEN!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.