Posted on 10/26/2013 3:31:25 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Millions of people are in for a shock at the end of the week when their food stamp benefits will be cut across the board.
There is little chance that Congress will act to avert what hunger activists call the “food stamp cliff” — a cut to benefits that will affect some 47 million beneficiaries, including children and the elderly.
The cut takes effect on Nov. 1, and will bring an end to a funding increase that Democrats wrapped into President Obama’s 2009 stimulus law.
For a family of four, the cut will be $36 per month, or about 20 meals under the Department of Agriculture’s estimate for the cost of a “thrifty meal.” Single adults will see their monthly benefits reduced to $189 per month, for a cut of $11.
“We have never seen a cut like this affecting all beneficiaries,” said Lisa Davis of the food bank network Feeding America. “With the government shutdown and other national and international issues going on, many people have no idea this is coming.”
Davis said that food banks are bracing for an influx of the needy as the holiday season approaches, and are concerned about keeping up with demand after donations wane in January.
“We’re hugely concerned … this will affect 23 million kids,” said Tom Nelson of Share Our Strength, a group focused on child hunger. “At a minimum we can’t accept more cuts.”
Conservatives argue that food stamp spending has spiraled out of control under Obama, creating a disincentive to work and ballooning the budget deficit.
Food stamp cuts have emerged as the flashpoint in the fight between the House and Senate over farm bill legislation.
Hunger groups are fighting a House proposal to cut an addition $40 billion from food stamps in the farm bill. Those cuts come primarily from provisions that would make it harder to qualify for food stamps when receiving other aid, such as home heating assistance, and by stopping states from waiving work requirements.
Conferees from the House and Senate will begin negotiating the farm bill on Oct. 30.
Republicans defend the proposed $40billion cut, and say that even after the “food stamp cliff” is tacked on, projected spending on food stamps will never return to pre-recession levels.
Republicans also argue that overall means-tested welfare benefits will continue to rise even as the cuts take effect.
“Welfare spending at the end of this year will total out to $217 billion more than welfare spending in 2008,” said Stephen Miller, a spokesman for Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.).
He added that in some states total benefits exceed $40,000.
“The current structure of welfare in America depresses cash wages and punishes work. Our compassion should compel us to reform welfare and promote wage growth," Miller said.
Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) said the food stamp cliff was ignored by Congress because of the fiscal fights that gripped Washington.
“Members haven’t been talking about it but I’m talking about it,” she said. “Budget negotiations, sequester, the government shutdown. These are big issues but the food stamp cut should also be an issue.”
But while DeLauro called the cuts “deplorable,” she conceded Congress wouldn’t be reversing them.
“It is not going to be averted,” she said.
Instead, the action appears to be in the conference committee on the farm bills. The Senate version cuts $4 billion from the program, on top of the reductions going into effect on Nov. 1.
“We have to fight any cuts in the farm bill,” DeLauro said.
"..........Tanner’s report, “SNAP Failure: The Food Stamp Program Needs Reform,” finds that in 2000 the cost of the food stamp program was just $17 billion. It has risen in cost to $78 billion today.
Spending on advertising and outreach for food stamps by federal and state governments has also increased, now amounting to $41.3 million a year.
States like Florida have hired “food stamp recruiters,” who have a quota of signing up 150 new recipients each month. Rhode Island hosts “SNAP-themed bingo games,” and the USDA tells its field offices to throw parties to get more people on their rolls......"
Welfare, Not Full-Time Work, Is Now America’s No. 1 Occupation
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3083762/posts
Gee no lobster on Friday. Boohoo Boohoo. Maybe they will have to eat at McDonald’s.
Jack Kemp with 5X the brain power?
I can’t take this crap anymore. Whining and complaining about “free” money and a 5% cut.
dang
It’s not a cut. It’s the end of a temporary increase.
Actually, we'll all be drinking free BubbleUp and eating that rainbow stew...
There is absolutely no honesty in the MSM or any politicians
It's all about the children! Taxpayer money was used once again to pay street solicitors (drug dealers) to sign people up (drug users) for food stamps. They have created a senario that they will benefit from when the stamps stop and the riots ensue
Dey ain't got time fo' dat!
And on Nov 13, 14 there’s going to be the Grid Shutdown. How much can we take?
Oh good, another financial crisis. Yay. I was getting sort of bored.
It doesn’t cost anywhere near $189 a month for a single person to eat well. With families, it’s even more insane. Keep in mind if they have kids in school, those kids get free breakfast, lunch, and healthy snack. On a full week of school, that’s 10 of their 21 meals for free in addition to the food stamps.
This is more about setting the table for the 2014 elections. Dems can now say Republicans cut food stamps and their LIVs will eat it up.
“Maybe they will have to eat at McDonald’s.”
McDonalds is going to need the business to replace at least some part of the business they are losing because of their lobbying of lawmakers to hire illegal aliens as workers to avoid hiring the jobless Americans enrolling for foodstamps paid for by the taxes of working Americans.
You can add this: the GOPe will blame Conservatives like Cruz for the cuts.
Foodstamps should be cut 5.5% a month until they are ended (18mo). Then fire and revoke the pension of every Federal parasite that "works" on the dozens of these destructive, wasteful welfare programs.
Our Republic cannot sustain this evil socialism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.