Skip to comments.
Space Weapons an "Inevitability," Says Commander-in-Chief of China Airforce
Daily Telegraph ^
Posted on 11/04/2009 11:01:27 AM PST by rtran1971
In a wide-ranging interview in the People's Liberation Army (PLA) Daily, air force commander Xu Qiliang said it was imperative for the PLA air force to develop offensive and defensive operations in outer space.
"We must build an outer space force that conforms with the needs of our nation's development (and) the demands of the development of the space age."
"Only power can protect peace," the 59-year-old commander said in the interview given to coincide with this month's 60th anniversary of the founding of the PLA air force.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailytelegraph.com.au ...
TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: china; military; space; weapon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
11/04/2009 11:01:28 AM PST
by
rtran1971
To: rtran1971
Xu Qiliang is SO naive. All a nation need do is engage its enemies in dialogue, and work out all the little misunderstandings with them, and peace and love will conquer the globe. Ask President Obama.
To: rtran1971
actually reading the article, I find it hard to disagree with the guy. Of course space will be weaponized, if it isn’t some already.
To: rtran1971
"That's no moon. It's a space station."
4
posted on
11/04/2009 11:11:10 AM PST
by
SIDENET
("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
To: rtran1971; Impy; fieldmarshaldj; KevinDavis
5
posted on
11/04/2009 11:11:48 AM PST
by
Perdogg
(Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
To: WoofDog123
I’m sure it is. The shuttle program, if nothing else, proved with the repairing of the Hubble that we could go pluck their satellites out of the sky, one by one. No one else can do that... yet.
6
posted on
11/04/2009 11:14:58 AM PST
by
SpinnerWebb
(mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves)
To: WoofDog123
The US has no Space Weapons?
7
posted on
11/04/2009 11:15:23 AM PST
by
Paladin2
To: WoofDog123
Of course space will be weaponized, if it isnt some already.If it ain't, then we're stupider than I already believe.
8
posted on
11/04/2009 11:18:31 AM PST
by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: Paladin2
Apparently not, we don’t even spy on people anymore.
9
posted on
11/04/2009 11:19:14 AM PST
by
Perdogg
(Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
To: rtran1971
Now more than ever....Start growing some Spartans:
Seriously though, we will lose whatever edge we have in space unless we change the direction of the government.
The Chinese know how the world works and they will make it work for them.
10
posted on
11/04/2009 11:20:28 AM PST
by
AreaMan
To: rtran1971
Can we please build one?
11
posted on
11/04/2009 11:23:52 AM PST
by
Domandred
(Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system. I am Jim Thompson.)
To: rtran1971
"Take the high ground, and hold it!" Sun Tzu. Whoever controls the high ground controls the battle. We learned that in WWII. Winning the ground war in Europe followed on the heels of winning the air war.
12
posted on
11/04/2009 11:24:00 AM PST
by
Telepathic Intruder
(The right thing is not always the popular thing)
To: Perdogg
"we dont even spy on people anymore."
Of course we do. Look at the Whitey House vs. Glen Beck.
13
posted on
11/04/2009 11:24:10 AM PST
by
Paladin2
To: rtran1971
We’d better eliminate our space program so we can hit the reset button with the US/China relations. (/sarcasm)
14
posted on
11/04/2009 11:25:56 AM PST
by
listenhillary
(A "cult of personality" arises when a leader uses mass media creating idealized/heroic public image)
To: rtran1971
It is almost as if we are handing the reins of destiny to the Chinese along with a box of chocolate.
We need to develop space superiority or it is all over int he long run.
15
posted on
11/04/2009 11:27:43 AM PST
by
GraceG
To: Paladin2
President Obama opposes new weapons development by the US as well as efforts to maintain our existing nuclear arsenal.
The Commander in Chief is AWOL.
16
posted on
11/04/2009 11:28:50 AM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(I refuse to "reduce my carbon footprint" all while Lenin remains in an airconditioned shrine)
To: Domandred
An BC-304 is quite the Shovel Ready project, plus it would prevent a brain drain from occurring.
Also F-302s would be better than Raptor fighter.
17
posted on
11/04/2009 11:29:01 AM PST
by
GraceG
To: Perdogg
Ah Moonraker, great theme and weak story.
18
posted on
11/04/2009 1:49:03 PM PST
by
wally_bert
(It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
To: Domandred
We would have to build one and give away to the Russians and Chinese to be fair.
19
posted on
11/04/2009 1:49:52 PM PST
by
wally_bert
(It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
To: wally_bert
We can trade one to the Russians for full control of the Stargate back. The Chinese though...ah they’ll probably wreck the thing on their first mission anyways.
20
posted on
11/04/2009 2:12:17 PM PST
by
Domandred
(Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system. I am Jim Thompson.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson