Skip to comments.Involvement in Amirault case makes Martha Coakley unfit to replace Ted Kennedy as Senator
Posted on 01/01/2010 8:21:05 PM PST by seton89
Martha Coakley, the current Massachusetts Attorney General, is not fit to be a United States Senator. Anyone who thinks so only needs to study the Fells Acres Day Care case. The Fells Acres Day Care was started by Violet Amirault and run with the help of her son, Gerald, and his sister, Cheryl Amirault LeFave. In the midst of the daycare sex abuse hysteria of the 1980s, all three were charged with multiple counts of sexual abuse.
The charges were some of the most heinous ever made. However, they were also ludicrous. Supposedly Gerald dressed up as a clown and assaulted the children in a secret or magic room. Some children claimed to be sodomized with two foot knives and lobsters. Some of the acts allegedly took place on the front lawn in full view of the highway.
The alleged acts would have caused bodily fluids to be left on carpets, the children's clothing and elsewhere, but none were ever found. The alleged acts would have been very painful to children, but no child ever complained about pain after day care, nor did parents ever notice any injuries..
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
Coakley should be in prison.
To paraphrase what Curt Schilling said on Good Morning America in ‘04, “Everybody go out and vote, and vote Brown.”
Who knows—Scott could pull it out if enough people get out there and vote. The more people know about Coakley the more likely they’ll support Scott.
“We’ve Had Enough!”
This is getting interesting - when comedians start taking the Obama agenda serious!
I remember the ‘child molester’ witch hunts of the 80’s. The Amirault case and another high profile case in Wenatchee Washington were among the most high profile ones, both of which were frame-ups. Though Republican presidents were in office, it was still in my view a detestable time. Iran-Contra, The Beriut bombing, Tailhook, The Bork lynching..., and yes the Amirault case. The American left was on the march. It amazes me how many of those bastards are still in office.
Senate Candidate Martha Coakley OK with F*sting for Teens
(You will probably get this warning: “Some readers have contacted Google because they believe this site is objectionable.” It gives you the opportunity to continue or not continue going into the site.)
She is ≈ The Sot of the Senate.
Correction of a Correction
Ted Kennedy is the erstwhile Sot of the Senate. Baucus is the incumbent.
Stupid people, led by the nose by self-serving politicians masquerading as lawyers.
It IS objectionable, unfortunately, teenagers in MA are exposed to it!
...and don't forget the McMartin one in Manhattan Beach, CA.
The kids had stories of underground tunnels... and after the house was sold, it was razed and folks actually dug with a backhoe to find the tunnels...
There were none....
Every liberal I ever knew hated Ted Kennedy. I lived in northern New Jersey, New York, and Massachusetts. They viewed him as a bloated liar and probable murderer who was exploiting the deaths of his brothers.
They also knew that Kennedy was a pro at patronage and pork and they knew that the seat was his until he chose to leave it. There is a realistic chance the dems could lose that seat. If so, it would go to someone who campaigns like a RINO, but that person better bring money into eastern Massachusetts.
Here’s Ann Coulter’s take on the election:
I had forgotten about the McMartin case, but yes you’re right...another frame-up. We haven’t evolved that much since Salem have we? What was particularly barbaric about the Amirault case was the way the oldest son was kept in jail even when it became common knowledge that the whole thing was a hoax. The fact that no politicians, or their henchmen went to prison for those atrocities speaks volumes about our society. Like I said, it was a detestable time. I remember it with more than a little bitterness.
SEIU launches $214K radio buy for Coakley
I remember reading about those cases: some of the acts alleged were literally, classically, physically impossible: but I will not sully the pages of FR by repeating the charges.
Why this woman hasn't been sued into oblivion and involuntarily confined, I'll never know.
Makes me wonder what they put in the water in Boston: here in Minneapolis, at least, we know it's the Scandahoovian heritage that makes people liberal. And except for Al Franken (Stuart Smalley-MN), it's usually mixed with "Minnesota nice."
I have no idea why in the world Mass voters would elect this woman for anything.
And I happen to be a Mass born Scandahoovian who lived for three years in Minneapolis, around 7 corners. (Talk about screwed up).
And I have a bunch of conservative cousins still remaining in Mass.
The daycare "child molester" hysteria of the '80s was not particularly liberal or leftist in origin. It affected and was supported by people of all political orientations. As with most "social panics," in retrospect it's hard to believe.
The mantras of the time were, "Believe the children," and "Children don't lie." Neither of these can be given any credence by an intelligent person.
My wife ran a successful home day care business at the time. She shut it down because of the potential for accusations of abuse.
Perhaps the saddest part of this whole thing is that actual children continued to be molested and abused, with the backlash from the hysteria possibly making prosecutions of genuine cases less likely.
I'm sure that you're correct about that. I would also agree that 'social panics' are not necessarily brought about exclusively by the left or the right, though I do believe that the left is far and away more adept at capitalizing on them. My 'left on the march' comment was more in context with the other events I mentioned (tailhook, Iran-Contra etc.) and my view that it was a detestable period. It's also a very good example of my inability to focus on one topic at a time.
Martha Coakley is a subhuman witch.
Go away, worm.
I told my MA As A Mom local group about this the other night! I also mentioned that Martha Coakley always has a HARD look about her; something I’ve noticed about every woman of whom I’m aware who is all for Partial Birth Abortion. It’s like they had to turn off part of their emotional selves in order to justify their support of that heinous procedure.
Oh, it wasn’t just in MA! There were similar cases in CA, NC, and WA. It was just the times, and the media blowing it ALL out of proportion. Come to think of it, I do’t think ANY of those cases had any truth to them whatsoever, but DAs in all those places ‘made their bones’ on them, using them as a stepping stone to higher office.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.