Skip to comments.Taitz Files Motion for Judicial Notice in D.C. District Court
Posted on 04/10/2010 10:31:17 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
Plaintiff in this case respectfully requests a judicial notice of the order by Judge Roger Vinson, Northern district of Florida, State of Florida et al v Department of Health et al 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT. Exhibit 1.
Plaintiff in this case, being a Doctor of Dental Surgery, was seeking an intervener status in case 10-cv-91, which was brought by attorneys of 13 states challenging constitutionality of the Healthcare Bill H.R. 3590. While motion to intervene was not granted under judicial discretion due to the fact that multiple interveners have filed their motions and the presiding judge decided to limit the case to the issue of the Commerce clause raised by the original plaintiffs, this order provides an indication of the plaintiffs standing to bring forward her challenge of the H.R. 3590, noting Taitz contends, and I agree, that she has satisfied steps (1) and (2). Her motion to intervene was timely and, as a Doctor of Dental Surgery, who will be affected by this act, she clearly has an interest in this action.
Regardless of whether ultimately the plaintiff in this action will prevail or not, above ruling of the sister court has indicated that Taitz has standing to bring her action challenging H.R. 3590, which to a great extend serves as an opposition to the defendants motion to dismiss due to lack of standing.
Additionally, Judge Vinson does not find the issue of Mr. Obamas eligibility due to lack of Natural Born status to be frivolous. He simply states that in the interest of expediency he decided to limit the case to the issues raised by the original plaintiffs. Yet again is seems to negate the notion by the defense that the eligibility issue is frivolous. Clearly, the plaintiff, as A Doctor of Dental Surgery, having tangible interest and standing to bring forward the issue of legitimacy of H.R. 3590 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act can do so on both the basis of violation of the Commerce clause, as well as on basis of Common law Fraud and Quo Warranto, asserting that the bill was signed by one who got into the position of Presidency by virtue of fraud and concealment of all of the original vital records, as the affidavits of three licensed investigators show that the defendant fraudulently used multiple US Social Security numbers, and the Social Security number 042-68-4425 used by the defendant for most of his life, was issued to another individual in the state of Connecticut. US Attorneys Machen, Contreras and Burch, who have been representing the defendant in this case, have a conflicting duty to We The People of the United States, including the plaintiff in this case, to protect and defend them against such fraud. Above US attorneys have been put on notice of the fraud committed via the pleadings in this case, yet they breached their duty and their Oath of Office to defend the Constitution and to defend We, the People of the United States. As such, they became accomplices to the above fraud and other possible criminal acts, to be fully investigated during discovery. Judge Vinson in his order states The parties to this litigation, and, indeed, the citizens of this country, have an interest in having this case resolved as soon as possible. The plaintiff is praying for expedient discovery, as she, as well as other doctors and other citizens need an adjudication on the issue of fraud committed by Mr. Obama in order to get into office.
Plaintiff respectfully requests Judicial notice of the above order as an indication of the Plaintiffs standing. She also requests expedient adjudication of prior Motion for Injunctive relief, as well as the plaintiffs Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, which the clerk of the court has erroneously docketed together with the First Amended Complaint (pages 129-145) when the plaintiffs Electronic Filing Code didnt function yet.
That does leave the door open for the AG’s to file a second lawsuit questioning Obamacare because of the President’s eligibility.
Though I suspect Obama’s popularity would have to continue to fall for at least another 6 months to a year before they would consider such a course.
The Obama Presidency you mean?
Yeah, where’s the, “Geez, not this **** again?” sign when you need it?
What lunacy? That’s a good one. Surely you jest!
Orly Taitz has single-handedly run the credibility of the eligibility issue into the ground. Now she wants to attach her freak circus train to healthcare opposition and run its credibility into the ground. We need to keep her as far away from the healthcare lawsuits as humanly possible.
She’s no patriot. She’s an incompetent, attention whore, mental case who couldn’t properly interpret a judicial ruling if Chief Justice Roberts explained it to her word for word in Russian.
If they haven't been concerned about his eligibility before now, which they haven't, then it gonna magically happen.
Orly Taitz is going to bust Obama wide open-if someone doesn’t beat her to the punch! So buckle your seat belts all you free riders your gonna need them.The temperatures rising.
Welll...... maybe so.
However, it seems like the woman who would not stop knocking on the door of the judge all night, wanting justice for her case (in a parable told by Jesus). Eventually, he gave in just to get her to stop, even though he did not care about the issue of justice per se.
I admire very much her use of a judge's ruling (the wording of which) implies that she has standing. Its not clear to me if she is using the wording on the same case or a different one, but she just won't give up.
I am inclined to agree that in the court of public opinion, she is not good for the conservative movement, or the "natural born citizen" movement.
However, the court of public opinion means very little. It takes no notice of judicial malfeasance so far. It ridicules people who are doing the right thing no matter what. It threatens prosecution, and carries out retaliation on those who seek the truth.
My co-workers have decided long ago that Obama is eligible and anyone who says otherwise simply either 1. hates blacks, or 2. has a spiteful difference of politics motivating them. "Besides" they say, "He is president now... what would you have done?"
One case. One judge. Traction. Thats all that is needed.
I know her chances are small. (They were from the beginning.) And I know that her antics have not won any points with judges. But --based on the caliber of legal review in the courts so far -- she did not have much to lose by pursuing this persistently.
Just food for thought.
Which of us by worrying can change the slightest thing about our lives? Yet that is my main political activity, that is, just after staying informed, and closely followed by prayer.
Who has been as fervent and diligent in the defense of our country as Orly? I suggest that because she has lived in a country without the freedoms and privelages we have here, she values them more highly.
James Manning is a little nutty, I think.
Glen Beck --in my opinion-- has made a compromise in order to continue to exert a positive influence.
Sean Hannity's show last night in New Orleans was practically un-watchable due to the crowd noise.
Bill O'Reilly, still top of the ratings, can really be a pinhead himself sometimes.
Rush Limbaugh lost a lot of credibility with liberals due to his use/abuse of prescription painkillers.
And yet, all of them together are starting to sound the same alarm, it seems. "We must all hang together or we shall surely all hang separately", so to speak.
Orly has trouble communicating. I think English may not be her second language, but 3rd or 4th.... She is no dummy.
Last question (grin) Doesn't your family have a nutty aunt that people love in spite of how she acts?
Thanks for the honor of making me the recipient of your first post on FR.
Orly Taitz is going to bust Obama wide open-if someone doesn’t beat her to the punch! So buckle your seat belts all you free riders your gonna need them.The temperatures rising.
Wow......... duplicate of your first post. I must be something special to you.......
I think we’re in needed of your “You will be assimilated” image on this thread.
Probably not, but they'll be more interested now, that he's threatening to bankrupt the state.
The problem with the courts leaving eligibility to congress and a "political solution", is it's just bad politics for anyone who has to run for office to anger Obama supporters by challenging him. They are still too large a portion of the population for an elected official to risk completely losing a voting block that size.
Many of us feel that Taitz FAILED clown school.
SHOW US THE CLOWN CERTIFICATE!
Strictly speaking on the legal merits, without going into my opinion of the case in general, there are 2 things that pop out.
1)Vinson(?) protected himself by relying upon “discretion.”
2) The “quo warranto” judge will rush his decision up to chop out the underlying claim.
parsy, who finds this obvious
This is the worn out “Nut and Slut” attack strategy repeatedly seen by the communists and Marxists who desperately want freedom destroyed in our nation. Honestly, it is soooo transparent it is laughable. This strategy should be hung out to dry on the line right next to the “racist” charges.
I'd bet my entire 401k that the Obama operatives have been digging through Orly's trash from the beginning looking for any evidence whatsoever that would hang a real “whore” albatross around her neck. So far they can only sling figurative “whore” accusations at her. In the case, you use “attention” whore.
There is more to Obama’s eligibility than merely the legal aspect. Thanks to Orly's persistence Obama’s eligibility has been widely publicized throughout the Internet. In spite of both a Marxist media and conservative media blackout, close to half ( or more ) of the nation has **serious** questions regarding Obama’s eligibility. Several states have bills in progress that would demand that candidates prove their eligibility before their name can be placed on the ballot. In Arizona 40 of 90 state representatives have sponsored a bill that would demand **proof** of eligibility.
What's next? Are the Marxists going to smear these representatives( who are respected **leaders** in their communities) with the “Nut and Slut” slurry?
Thanks to Orly, Obama’s eligibility is like a great big rotting carcass of road kill blocking the road to the 2010 and 2012 elections. The Marxists ( mis-named Democrats) will NOT NOT NOT be able to drive around that fly infested stinking mess.
What is it with Orly that she can’t take ‘no’ for an answer?
Wake up and smell the coffee. Orly isn’t on your side.
It seems to me Vinson was writing tongue-in-cheek, if you read it carefully. :) After all, when Orly filed 154 pages of attachments, none of which had anything remotely to do with health care, to try to horn in on a suit that's exclusively about HCR, could he actually take her seriously?
2) The quo warranto judge will rush his decision up to chop out the underlying claim.
Judge Lamberth hasn't said a word as yet. The clerks have just been patiently documenting Orly's endless submissions. In this one, by the way, she also threatens to prosecute the US Attorneys for fraud because they dared to file motions to dismiss (which is their job). She sure has a way of impressing judges with her unique interpretation of the law.
If it weren't for Orly Obama’s eligibility wouldn't have received the Internet publicity that it has.
All it takes is one judge and the game is over for Obama.
Shameless vanity. I posted this last nite on another thread for all those unjustly accused of being trolls:
On the issues of trolls, I am somewhat sensitive, because I feel I have been unjustly accused of a crime that I didnt commit. I am looking around for a screenwriter to do a television series, like BRANDED, or maybe THE FUGITIVE. I kind of like BRANDED, because the theme music is kewler.
Branded, scorned as a OBOT Mole- doo doo doo dooooo.
What do you do when youre branded?
And they call you a TROLL....
So far, no one is interested.
However, I have written a poem, which should apply to those unjustly accused of being Trolls, whoever and wherever they might be:
The Troll Poem
If you dont agree with ME,
You surely are a TROLL, you see.
It all works out so LOGICKLY,
YOU are a Troll, if WE dont agree.
And if you disagree with ME,
Ill tell the MODS, just wait and see!
Thats how Ill WIN my victory.
By TANTRUMS from my nursery.
Ill save the MENTAL energy
Defending MY absurdity,
From ANY who might disagree
By crying TROLL quite frequently.
I have no sense of DECENCY.
Its all about my VANITY.
The Center of the Universe is ME!
And youre a TROLL if you dont agree!
Optional T.S.Eliot type ending, for high class web sites:
This is how the argument ends...
This is how the argument ends...
This is how the argument ends...
Not with a bang. . .but a Simper.
I have to say that we're getting to the point where Orly is not even funny anymore.
It's like watching seventeen straight hours of Monty Python.
Eventually you just can't believe anyone could do this.
I think you are going down a road that some other conservatives have traveled. That is, “Orly may be nutz, and the issue ridiculous, BUT if it throws mud on Obama, so be it.” For all I know, you may be right. But there are dangers.
First, a lie is a lie is a lie. Doesn’t matter who says it, if it isn’t true, then it is morally wrong. Plus, lies and mis-truths have a way of backfiring on people.
Second, and forgetting for now the moral implications and focusing only on cynical political considerations: is the mudslinging really having any impact on voters who will likely vote for Obama in the future? My instinct tells me the only people who believe this are people who didn’t vote for Obama in the first place. So, there is no gain.
But the analysis should not stop there. In the last election most independents went for Obama as I recall. That group of voters is less partisan. They can swing to Obama, they can swing to Palin, for example. They are the unknown.
The question is, how does the mudslinging affect them? It seems Obama and his cohorts are quite prepared to smear conservatives, the Tea Party, the GOP, Palin, etc. with the “crazy” brush. So, for no net gain, the mudslinging may actually turn into a net loss. That is the fear expressed by most serious conservative pundits, including Beck and Coulter, and others.
As for me, I just think it is wrong to lie about stuff. Back in the Reagan days, I was a staunch Republican, and might be again if they ever run off the durn economic Libertarian goobers. I remember how Saint Teddy Kennedy and the foul Democrats used to trash Reagan and accuse him of trying to destroy the country, and being a nazi, and hater and all that crap. I thought it was wrong then.
I never had a problem with people disagreeing with his policies, but the hateful crap seemed wrong to me. Reagan was our President, like him or not, and any implication that he wasn’t doing what he thought was right, whether you agreed with him or not, seemed out of place. It still seems wrong to me.
So, if you choose the “mudslinging is fine if it hurts the other side” road, just be prepared for a potential backfire.
I think you’re right. That remark about other issues, and the credibility of the BC did seem to have the air of snark about it.
But, she had nothing to lose. The quo warranto was going down regardless of whether she tried to consolidate or not. The really embarrassing thing would have been if one or more of the AG’s had moved in opposition to her Motion. That would have looked bad in her political campaign. This way, she can blame the “corrupt” legal system.
Are you off of double secret probation?
Well. I do hope that you are not holding your breath waiting.
No. I don’t think this thread really counts as an eligibility type thread. It is more about Orly. And, I am staying away from fully expressing my opinion about the merits. However, the little sissies on the other thread are coming to life. Who knows.
parsy, who thinks Orly will be dismissed in DC pretty quickly now
We're a hard-core cadre of Obots who have been around for anywhere from a few years to a decade just waiting for our cells to be activated.
Good things you joined a few weeks ago to point this out.
Parsy’s invited to share his thoughts on any article I post.
He can’t be accused of trolling if he and the freeper who posted the article are in agreement, can he?
I mean, jeeze...
Go Orly go!
Are you saying that Barry’s Presidency is a lunacy?
I agree. Plus, I am not really letting loose on the other guys the way I want to.
parsy, the well behaved
Your attorney is an incompetent clown.
Rethink your strategy.
SHut up, man! You aren't supposed to tell them that!
It just slipped out.
I guess that’s why I never get promoted.
Well, Cpt. Barnett, please accept my sincerest thanks for your service to our beloved nation. Your sacrifice is appreciated and held in highest regard.
Now, I’ll address the points you raised.
First, you mistakenly assume that any freeper who disagrees with the unconscionable tactics of Orly Taitz is automatically an Obot. You’re very wrong. Birthers use “respect for Orly” as a conservative litmus test on FR. But, last I checked, “respect for Orly Taitz” wasn’t listed in the Republican Party platform as a value conservatives uphold and support. Neither do I see it listed in Jim Robinson’s mission statement for FR.
I am a freedom-loving, law-abiding conservative. I despise Barack Hussien Obama and his Chicago Thugs. I’m terrified that they’ll damage our beloved nation more than that from which we will be able to recover. I am not an Obot and I am not a troll. Most of the other freepers who feel the same way about Orly as I do are also conservatives and not trolls or Obots.
Secondly, you also mistakenly assume that I don’t find the Constitution worthy of defending. You couldn’t be further from the truth. As the Supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution must be defended - from Obama and Orly!
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. would have the Constitution twisted and the rules that govern our justice system bent to achieve her goal of having Obama removed from office. She hasn’t presented a shred of credible evidence that Obama was born somewhere other than Hawaii. It is the responsibility of the plaintiff to prove his/her case. Yet Orly would have the defendant prove to the plaintiff that he is a natural born citizen.
In case Orly didn’t tell you, the Constitution does not define “natural born citizen.” So we must look elsewhere for that definition and attempt to understand the intent of the Founding Fathers. The fact is we don’t know whether or not Obama is a natural born citizen because the SCOTUS has not ruled on his specific birth circumstances. We can make arguments for and against his NBC status. But until we can bring a proper case to the SCOTUS, we’ve got nada.
Ask yourself this question: Are you willing to accept a ruling by the SCOTUS that Obama is a natural born citizen? If you’re unwilling, then it’s not the Constiution you want to see upheld but rather your (and Orly’s and every other birther’s) interpretation of it.
In my experience with birthers, they say they want the Constitution upheld, but in truth, what they really want is their own definitions of “natural born citizen” to be upheld as valid. And no proof Obama provided to that end would be acceptable to birthers. If he provided the long-form BC tomorrow, they’d claim he had two plus years to produce a perfect forgery. They already accuse the Hawaii DoH officials of conspiracy and certain Honorable Federal Judges of being corrupt or “gotten to.” So no legal statements from the Hawaii government will suffice and neither will any judicial ruling that is contrary to the goal of removing Obama. What evidence will satisfy the birthers? Obama’s removal from office is the only acceptable outcome for birthers.
Let’s be honest, it’s not about the Constitution because natural born citizen is not defined there. It’s about removing Obama from office. And Orly is willing to use anyone who suits her purpose and any method that brings about the end goal.
Orly Taitz is no patriot.
Well, you've got me there!
She loves the attention.
“The fact is we dont know whether or not Obama is a natural born citizen because the SCOTUS has not ruled on his specific birth circumstances. We can make arguments for and against his NBC status. But until we can bring a proper case to the SCOTUS, weve got nada.”
I agree but I find it very troubling. It appears to me, based upon what I think the founders intended, that President Obama is not a NBC because his father was not a U.S. Citizen. Why won’t the POTUS hear a case on this...many presented...and put and end to speculation? OR by allowing allowing President Obama to continue to sit unchallenged...aren’t they setting a de facto precident? This just doesn’t seem right to me. Why the silence and sidestep?????
Sorry....meant to say SCOTUS not POTUS.
I don’t know what you’re smoking, but it can’t be legal.
Canada Free Press
Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.
But not ONE member of Americas most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand.
Half of the people you expect to stop this insanity are quiet co-conspirators in the silent coup. The other half is paralyzed by fear, motivated only by political self-preservation.
Americans keep asking what they can do because they see that none of their leaders are doing anything to stop the demise of their beloved country. Its the right question, because those leaders are NOT going to stop this thing.
WHO WILL SAVE FREEDOM?
A brave few This is how it was in the beginning, how it has always been and how it will be.
DR. ORLY TAITZ, Phil Berg and Gary Kreep, ALL OF WHOM HAVE MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP.
A PRECIOUS FEW, BUT THEY EXIST and the walls are indeed closing in on Obama and his evil cabal. IF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FAIL TO GET BEHIND THESE BRAVE FEW WHO ARE SEEKING PEACEFUL REDRESS, ALL THE PEACEFUL OPTIONS WILL EVAPORATE AS IF THEY NEVER EXISTED. WE WILL RETURN TO A PRE-1776 AMERICA OVERNIGHT..
Do YOU fear Obama?
A precious few, indeed. Lets get behind those few brave patriots who are out there in the trenches every day working to prove Obamas inelgibility:
Dr. Orly has put her lifes blood into this fight. SHE HAS MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP FROM COWARDLY REPUBLICANS AND THE SCOTUS.
Dr. Orly is the ONLY one out there in the trenches EVERY day hitting Obama on multiple fronts and trying to bring him down. It is reported that she is more than $8,000 in debt from using her own funds for expenses in her flights across the U.S for interviews, speeches, serving papers and meeting with officials.
She has even gone to Isreal and Russia to spread the message about Obamas inelgibility!
She states the case expertly, including the bc and natural born citizen aspect, when not abused by the U.S. state-controlled media. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/132880
Sure, Dr. Orly makes mistakes. We all do. But Dr. Orly is no dummy. How many of us could go to a foreign country, learn 5 languages, establish a successful dental practice, a successful real estate business AND pass the California state bar- one of the hardest in the U.S. to pass?
She may be a mail order attorney and not a Harvard lawyer, but she IS an attorney with all the rights and privilages of a Harvard lawyer nevertheless!
The point is; she has the passion, the zeal, the courage of her convictions and the love of America and its freedoms (unlike many of our great attorneys and patriots who criticize her) that will not let her give up!
She is exhausted. She is nervous. She is frustrated. It is reported that she gets by on 4-5 hours of sleep per night, and her family is very worried about her health- as well as her safety.
She makes mistakes. But she will NOT give up. She will keep on until she gets it right.
Stop tearing her apart. The Obots on FR dont need our help.
The obots are scared to death of this little lady and her determination. Thats why they come out in droves all over the net on forums, chat rooms and even the national news to attack and ridicule.
Even if Orly NEVER brings Obama to trial, she has almost single handly brought his ineligibility to world wide attention, caused him to spend MILLIONS on lawyers to keep his records hidden AND CAUSED THE MUZZIE TO SWEAT BULLETS!!!
I think Orly Taitz really works for Barack Hussein Obama II. No attorney could be that incompetent.
Judge Clay Land in Georgia was a conservative Republican congressman before he became a George W. Bush appointee as a federal judge and he fined Orly $20,000 for legal misconduct in filing frivolous motions.
The US Court of Appeals for the 11th District held Taitz’ appeal of the sanctions and they upheld her fine.
A troll with aching feet ? .. just joking, BTW ? how is your feet doing now ?
Sore. Trying to keep them elevated as much as I can. Lots of time to read. Not so bad. I’ll heal.
parsy, who says thanks for asking!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.