Posted on 04/10/2010 10:31:17 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
Plaintiff in this case respectfully requests a judicial notice of the order by Judge Roger Vinson, Northern district of Florida, State of Florida et al v Department of Health et al 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT. Exhibit 1.
Plaintiff in this case, being a Doctor of Dental Surgery, was seeking an intervener status in case 10-cv-91, which was brought by attorneys of 13 states challenging constitutionality of the Healthcare Bill H.R. 3590. While motion to intervene was not granted under judicial discretion due to the fact that multiple interveners have filed their motions and the presiding judge decided to limit the case to the issue of the Commerce clause raised by the original plaintiffs, this order provides an indication of the plaintiff’s standing to bring forward her challenge of the H.R. 3590, noting “Taitz contends, and I agree, that she has satisfied steps (1) and (2). Her motion to intervene was timely and, as a Doctor of Dental Surgery, who will be affected by this act, she clearly has an interest in this action”.
Regardless of whether ultimately the plaintiff in this action will prevail or not, above ruling of the sister court has indicated that Taitz has standing to bring her action challenging H.R. 3590, which to a great extend serves as an opposition to the defendant’s motion to dismiss due to lack of standing.
Additionally, Judge Vinson does not find the issue of Mr. Obama’s eligibility due to lack of Natural Born status to be frivolous. He simply states that in the interest of expediency he decided to limit the case to the issues raised by the original plaintiffs. Yet again is seems to negate the notion by the defense that the eligibility issue is frivolous. Clearly, the plaintiff, as A Doctor of Dental Surgery, having tangible interest and standing to bring forward the issue of legitimacy of H.R. 3590 “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” can do so on both the basis of violation of the Commerce clause, as well as on basis of Common law Fraud and Quo Warranto, asserting that the bill was signed by one who got into the position of Presidency by virtue of fraud and concealment of all of the original vital records, as the affidavits of three licensed investigators show that the defendant fraudulently used multiple US Social Security numbers, and the Social Security number 042-68-4425 used by the defendant for most of his life, was issued to another individual in the state of Connecticut. US Attorneys Machen, Contreras and Burch, who have been representing the defendant in this case, have a conflicting duty to “We The People of the United States”, including the plaintiff in this case, to protect and defend them against such fraud. Above US attorneys have been put on notice of the fraud committed via the pleadings in this case, yet they breached their duty and their Oath of Office to defend the Constitution and to defend “We, the People of the United States”. As such, they became accomplices to the above fraud and other possible criminal acts, to be fully investigated during discovery. Judge Vinson in his order states “The parties to this litigation, and, indeed, the citizens of this country, have an interest in having this case resolved as soon as possible”. The plaintiff is praying for expedient discovery, as she, as well as other doctors and other citizens need an adjudication on the issue of fraud committed by Mr. Obama in order to get into office.
Wherefore,
Plaintiff respectfully requests Judicial notice of the above order as an indication of the Plaintiffs standing. She also requests expedient adjudication of prior Motion for Injunctive relief, as well as the plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, which the clerk of the court has erroneously docketed together with the First Amended Complaint (pages 129-145) when the plaintiff’s Electronic Filing Code didn’t function yet.
That does leave the door open for the AG’s to file a second lawsuit questioning Obamacare because of the President’s eligibility.
Though I suspect Obama’s popularity would have to continue to fall for at least another 6 months to a year before they would consider such a course.
What lunacy?
The Obama Presidency you mean?
Yeah, where’s the, “Geez, not this **** again?” sign when you need it?
What lunacy? That’s a good one. Surely you jest!
Orly Taitz has single-handedly run the credibility of the eligibility issue into the ground. Now she wants to attach her freak circus train to healthcare opposition and run its credibility into the ground. We need to keep her as far away from the healthcare lawsuits as humanly possible.
She’s no patriot. She’s an incompetent, attention whore, mental case who couldn’t properly interpret a judicial ruling if Chief Justice Roberts explained it to her word for word in Russian.
If they haven't been concerned about his eligibility before now, which they haven't, then it gonna magically happen.
Orly Taitz is going to bust Obama wide open-if someone doesn’t beat her to the punch! So buckle your seat belts all you free riders your gonna need them.The temperatures rising.
Welll...... maybe so.
However, it seems like the woman who would not stop knocking on the door of the judge all night, wanting justice for her case (in a parable told by Jesus). Eventually, he gave in just to get her to stop, even though he did not care about the issue of justice per se.
I admire very much her use of a judge's ruling (the wording of which) implies that she has standing. Its not clear to me if she is using the wording on the same case or a different one, but she just won't give up.
I am inclined to agree that in the court of public opinion, she is not good for the conservative movement, or the "natural born citizen" movement.
However, the court of public opinion means very little. It takes no notice of judicial malfeasance so far. It ridicules people who are doing the right thing no matter what. It threatens prosecution, and carries out retaliation on those who seek the truth.
My co-workers have decided long ago that Obama is eligible and anyone who says otherwise simply either 1. hates blacks, or 2. has a spiteful difference of politics motivating them. "Besides" they say, "He is president now... what would you have done?"
One case. One judge. Traction. Thats all that is needed.
I know her chances are small. (They were from the beginning.) And I know that her antics have not won any points with judges. But --based on the caliber of legal review in the courts so far -- she did not have much to lose by pursuing this persistently.
Just food for thought.
Which of us by worrying can change the slightest thing about our lives? Yet that is my main political activity, that is, just after staying informed, and closely followed by prayer.
Who has been as fervent and diligent in the defense of our country as Orly? I suggest that because she has lived in a country without the freedoms and privelages we have here, she values them more highly.
James Manning is a little nutty, I think.
Glen Beck --in my opinion-- has made a compromise in order to continue to exert a positive influence.
Sean Hannity's show last night in New Orleans was practically un-watchable due to the crowd noise.
Bill O'Reilly, still top of the ratings, can really be a pinhead himself sometimes.
Rush Limbaugh lost a lot of credibility with liberals due to his use/abuse of prescription painkillers.
And yet, all of them together are starting to sound the same alarm, it seems. "We must all hang together or we shall surely all hang separately", so to speak.
Orly has trouble communicating. I think English may not be her second language, but 3rd or 4th.... She is no dummy.
Last question (grin) Doesn't your family have a nutty aunt that people love in spite of how she acts?
Thanks for the honor of making me the recipient of your first post on FR.
Orly Taitz is going to bust Obama wide open-if someone doesn’t beat her to the punch! So buckle your seat belts all you free riders your gonna need them.The temperatures rising.
Wow......... duplicate of your first post. I must be something special to you.......
I think we’re in needed of your “You will be assimilated” image on this thread.
Probably not, but they'll be more interested now, that he's threatening to bankrupt the state.
The problem with the courts leaving eligibility to congress and a "political solution", is it's just bad politics for anyone who has to run for office to anger Obama supporters by challenging him. They are still too large a portion of the population for an elected official to risk completely losing a voting block that size.
Many of us feel that Taitz FAILED clown school.
SHOW US THE CLOWN CERTIFICATE!
Strictly speaking on the legal merits, without going into my opinion of the case in general, there are 2 things that pop out.
1)Vinson(?) protected himself by relying upon “discretion.”
2) The “quo warranto” judge will rush his decision up to chop out the underlying claim.
parsy, who finds this obvious
This is the worn out “Nut and Slut” attack strategy repeatedly seen by the communists and Marxists who desperately want freedom destroyed in our nation. Honestly, it is soooo transparent it is laughable. This strategy should be hung out to dry on the line right next to the “racist” charges.
I'd bet my entire 401k that the Obama operatives have been digging through Orly's trash from the beginning looking for any evidence whatsoever that would hang a real “whore” albatross around her neck. So far they can only sling figurative “whore” accusations at her. In the case, you use “attention” whore.
There is more to Obama’s eligibility than merely the legal aspect. Thanks to Orly's persistence Obama’s eligibility has been widely publicized throughout the Internet. In spite of both a Marxist media and conservative media blackout, close to half ( or more ) of the nation has **serious** questions regarding Obama’s eligibility. Several states have bills in progress that would demand that candidates prove their eligibility before their name can be placed on the ballot. In Arizona 40 of 90 state representatives have sponsored a bill that would demand **proof** of eligibility.
What's next? Are the Marxists going to smear these representatives( who are respected **leaders** in their communities) with the “Nut and Slut” slurry?
Thanks to Orly, Obama’s eligibility is like a great big rotting carcass of road kill blocking the road to the 2010 and 2012 elections. The Marxists ( mis-named Democrats) will NOT NOT NOT be able to drive around that fly infested stinking mess.
What is it with Orly that she can’t take ‘no’ for an answer?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.