Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New evolutionary research disproves living missing link theories
University of Montreal ^ | February 10, 2011 | Unknown

Posted on 02/10/2011 4:52:11 PM PST by decimon

Genetic research proves worm has evolved to be less sophisticated than its ancestors

Evolution is not a steady march towards ever more sophisticated beings and therefore the search for the living "missing links" is pointless, according to findings published by a team of researchers led by Dr. Hervé Philippe of the Université de Montréal's Department of Biochemistry. "Aristotle was the first to classify organisms – from the least to the most sophisticated. Darwin's theory of evolution continued this idea, with the concept of a hierarchy of evolution. This way of thinking has led researchers and skeptics alike to look for less sophisticated ancestors in order to prove or disprove evolution," Philippe explained. "What we now know is that evolution does not happen in a single direction – when people talk about a missing link, they're generally excluding the possibility of more sophisticated ancestors."

The researchers compared the genomes of two kinds of marine worms with simple morphology – Xenoturbellida and Acoelomorpha – with those of other animals. They demonstrated that their previous position at the base of the bilateral symmetry animal group – that includes insects, mollusks and vertebrates – was inaccurate. "Instead, we determined that Xenoturbellida and Acoelomorpha are closely related to the complex deuterostomes, which is a major lineage containing sea urchins, humans and sharks," Philippe said. "I've put them in that order intentionally because it seems strange, which demonstrates our tendency to always put organisms in order of complexity." The findings mean that the worms had evolved from a more sophisticated ancestor through major simplifications.

"We did already know that most parasitic organisms had evolved to be less sophisticated than their ancestors – they lost certain abilities that they no longer needed. The independently living Xenoturbellida and Acoelomorpha do not fall in this category," Philippe said. The research is a striking example for the important role of secondary simplification in evolution and is part of 20 year project that is nearing completion. The findings were published in Nature on February 10, 2011.


TOPICS: History; Science
KEYWORDS: creationism; crevo; evolution; godsgravesglyphs; scientism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: decimon
"The findings mean that the worms had evolved from a more sophisticated ancestor through major simplifications. "

It is amazing to me how very much of the fossil record has to do with simplifications (i.e., Eohippus).

41 posted on 02/14/2011 6:37:52 AM PST by cookcounty (Knives, Guns, Enemies and Axx-Kicks: The Gentle Political Speech of President Barrimore Soetero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
"How is that evolution? this must be a different phenomenon, completely separate from evolution."

Not sure if I believe in Evolution, but I definitely believe in Devolution. Which are of necessity different processes. Devolution (simplifications--> the loss of information, or the loss of expression of information) is not evidence for Evolution.

The blind cave fish, or Eeohippus' losing its toes, say nothing (or at least very little) about evolution.

42 posted on 02/14/2011 6:46:24 AM PST by cookcounty (Knives, Guns, Enemies and Axx-Kicks: The Gentle Political Speech of President Barrimore Soetero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD; calex59; TheOldLady; killermosquito; AdmSmith; agrace; Senator_Blutarski; ...

A couple of people have suggested that FR could use some sort of an anti-evolution ping list... Anybody wishing to be added to the list should notify me via freepmail.


43 posted on 02/14/2011 8:55:12 AM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

I don’t think you should create an anti-evolution ping list. I think you should create an anti-macro-evolution ping list and the distinction is an important one. Or perhaps an intelligent design ping list which I would favor.

Add me to your list. Thank you.


44 posted on 02/14/2011 9:34:18 AM PST by killermosquito (Buffalo, Detroit (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

Unless there is a purpose to evil. It seems that faith as it applies to religion and thus to life, is more important than knowledge. At least that’s the message of Christianity.


45 posted on 02/14/2011 10:19:50 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty

An Evolutionist would say that you’d expect just such a flux there being times when a more “sophisticated” genetic make up was more favorable and other times/environments in which a simpler form was needed.


46 posted on 02/14/2011 10:30:45 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

Thank you for including me, please keep my name on your list.


47 posted on 02/14/2011 10:46:40 AM PST by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
A couple of people have suggested that FR could use some sort of an anti-evolution ping list... Anybody wishing to be added to the list should notify me via freepmail.

Please sign me up. Thanks Wendy!

48 posted on 02/14/2011 10:46:56 AM PST by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
I'm not into pushing religion of any sort. I'll RECOMMEND Christianity if somebody WANTS a recommendation, but even Voodoo and Rastafari are better than evolution: neither Voodoo nor Rastafari requires any sort of a belief in a trans-finite sequence of probabilistic miracles and neither Voodoo nor Rastafari has two world wars or 300,000,000 dead bodies lying around on account of it.

Evolution is junk science and as junk science goes, a spectacularly pernicious and dangerous flavor of it. Evolution was the philosophical corner stone of Nazism and Communism and the various eugenics movements. Worse, despite its having been thoroughly debunked over the last 100 years, its adherents still dominate discussions of it by sheer weight of numbers and decibel level.

You even see that on conservative forums like FR and in fact the argument you generally see is "Hey, you're making all of us (conservatives) look like kooks (by saying anything about evolution) and, funny thing, evolutionism appears to transcend left/right barriers. The evolutionist postings you see on FR or the Limbaugh or Coulter forums are basically indistinguishable from those you'd see on DU or anything else like that.

49 posted on 02/14/2011 10:50:21 AM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Senator_Blutarski; wendy1946

I vote for a lamarckian evolution ping list.


50 posted on 02/14/2011 11:01:42 AM PST by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

Sorry, I was addressing your concern about evil and its existence in our world.

It must have a purpose.


51 posted on 02/14/2011 12:00:15 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson