Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two Planets Discovered Sharing the Same Orbit
Popular Science ^ | Friday, February 25, 2011 | Julie Beck

Posted on 02/27/2011 5:17:43 PM PST by SunkenCiv

It is possible that such a phenomenon could occur when matter around a newborn star forms into planets. In a planet's orbit around a star, there are two places where a third body can safely orbit. These spots, known as Lagrange points, are 120 degrees in front of and behind whichever body is smaller. The discovered co-orbiting planets, located in the four-planet system KOI-730, are always 120 degrees apart, permanent fixtures in each others' night skies.

Fifty million years after the birth of our solar system, the moon may have formed from the debris of a collision between Earth and a Mars-sized body named Theia. For this to be true, Theia would have to have hit earth at a relatively low speed. Richard Gott and Edward Belbruno of Princeton University say that this could only have happened if Theia had originated in a Lagrange point. The discovery of the KOI-730 planets shows that it is possible.

(Excerpt) Read more at popsci.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; humbug; keywordidiots; koi730; lagrangepoints; pseudoscience; theia; utternonsense; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: Christian Engineer Mass
The reference was to LaGrange points ~ are you telling me they no longer exist?

Gee whiz, I have friends in the Astronomy Racket too! They sometimes talk out of school and give away the secrets.

21 posted on 02/27/2011 6:00:29 PM PST by muawiyah (Make America Safe For Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon
I understand why you are confused by that statement. So am I. 120 degrees is exactly one third of the orbit. If the large planet is 120 degrees in front then, obviously, the small planet is 120 degrees behind and vice versa.

These spots, known as Lagrange points, are 120 degrees in front of and behind whichever body is smaller.

Why not say "a Lagrange point is 120 degrees in front of and behind whichever body is bigger?" Regardless of which one is in front they will be 120 degrees apart according to what has been said here.

22 posted on 02/27/2011 6:00:40 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Some of the issues with the Theia hypothesis:

The ratios of the Moon’s volatile elements are not explained by the giant impact hypothesis. If the giant impact hypothesis is correct, they must be due to some other cause.

There is no evidence that the Earth ever had a magma ocean (an implied result of the giant impact hypothesis), and it is likely there exists material which has never been processed by a magma ocean.

The iron oxide (FeO) content (13%) of the Moon, which is intermediate between Mars (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%), rules out most of the source of the proto-lunar material from the Earth’s mantle.

If the bulk of the proto-lunar material had come from the impactor, the Moon should be enriched in siderophilic elements, when it is actually deficient in those.

The presence of volatiles such as water trapped in lunar basalts is more difficult to explain if the impact caused a catastrophic heating event.

The Moon’s oxygen isotopic ratios are essentially identical to those of Earth. Oxygen isotopic ratios, which can be measured very precisely, yield a unique and distinct signature for each solar system body, If Theia had been a separate proto-planet, it would probably have had a different oxygen isotopic signature than Earth, as would the ejected mixed material.


23 posted on 02/27/2011 6:02:54 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226

Somebody else posted it a few weeks back and it runs almost constantly when my computer is online.

One thing that seems to play out true is the fact that binary stars are common. Also interesting is the fact that supermassive objects fling small ones way out at astounding speeds.

I just wish it were far more detailed.


24 posted on 02/27/2011 6:03:42 PM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
From this article:

These spots, known as Lagrange points, are 120 degrees in front of and behind whichever body is smaller. The discovered co-orbiting planets, located in the four-planet system KOI-730, are always 120 degrees apart, permanent fixtures in each others’ night skies.

From the link in the linked article.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20160-two-planets-found-sharing-one-orbit.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=online-news

Gravitational "sweet spots" make this possible. When one body (such as a planet) orbits a much more massive body (a star), there are two Lagrange points along the planet's orbit where a third body can orbit stably. These lie 60 degrees ahead of and 60 degrees behind the smaller object. For example, groups of asteroids called Trojans lie at these points along Jupiter's orbit.

Which is it, 60 or 120 degrees? I can't finish my school project until I find out!

25 posted on 02/27/2011 6:10:23 PM PST by Eaker (The problem with the internet, you're never sure the accuracy of the quotes. ~ Abraham Lincoln, 1865)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
The Lagrange Points referred to in the article (L4 and L5) are 120 degrees apart, not 120 degrees ahead and behind.

The L4 & L5 points are stable. The other three are not.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

26 posted on 02/27/2011 6:17:08 PM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
Technically, the "Trojans" occupy the L5 or trailing point in Jupiter' orbit. The "Greeks" occupy the L4 or leading point.

They are some times collectively referred to as Trojan asteroids.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

27 posted on 02/27/2011 6:21:50 PM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon

Neither. Think of it like spokes on a steering wheel.

The Lagrangians are the same three points, just that two of them are occupied by planets.

You see the same thing, especially with Jupiter, Asteroids at both Lagragian points.


28 posted on 02/27/2011 6:25:51 PM PST by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

L2 and L3 are 60 degrees ahead or behind the most massive object.

And I see someone has already explained L4 and L5 lagrange points.


29 posted on 02/27/2011 6:27:23 PM PST by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Maybe John Norman wasn’t as crazy as we thought (nah).


30 posted on 02/27/2011 6:27:33 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Wanna learn humility? Become a Pittsburgh Pirates fan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Back doors are not secrete Mr potatoe head


31 posted on 02/27/2011 6:28:30 PM PST by al baby (Hi Mom!!! <sarc>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound
Doesn't this collision occur BEFORE the Iron Catastrophe?

If so that event would pretty much obliterate all the surface evidence for the collision.

I'd like to note that the statement regarding "magama" in the Wiki article is kind of questionable since, in fact, Earth has a LARGE magma presence immediately under the tectonic plates ~ HUGE HUGE bunch of magma! Silica, calcium, phosphorous, et al, simply floats on top of it ~

32 posted on 02/27/2011 6:39:13 PM PST by muawiyah (Make America Safe For Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

http://www.physics.montana.edu/faculty/cornish/lagrange.html


33 posted on 02/27/2011 7:03:36 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

I wholeheartedly agree that the Moon wasn’t born of the Earth, either through (non-nuclear) fission (TVF’s version is, born to relieve an overspin condition as the heavies sank to the early molten Earth’s core) or impact (the dominant paradigm). The Moon was captured by the Earth sometime in the last five percent of Earth’s existence.


34 posted on 02/27/2011 7:07:09 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

Yeah, otherwise...
Spitzer Sees the Aftermath of a Planetary Collision

35 posted on 02/27/2011 7:11:36 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon

It means that the writer of the article didn’t really understand what Lagrangian points are. :’)


36 posted on 02/27/2011 7:15:45 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“Why do we call asteroids asteroids and hemhorrhoids hemhorrhoids? Shouldn’t it be the other way around?” — Robert Schimmel


37 posted on 02/27/2011 7:16:30 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred

The need for low speed has to do with trying to make the scenario work at all. :’)


38 posted on 02/27/2011 7:17:00 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Well, you know... rumors run wild.

Sorry ZZTop


39 posted on 02/27/2011 7:17:50 PM PST by jurroppi1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Some Fat Guy in L.A.

The paperbacks had some of the best sexist covers, ever. ;’)


40 posted on 02/27/2011 7:19:20 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson