Posted on 03/15/2011 6:49:19 AM PDT by chatter4
Great video. Who's Your Daddy? Obama-Who's Your Daddy? Jack Cashill reviews four of the possible fathers of Barack Hussein Obama on the Andrea Shea King show. There is a lot of information given which many may not have heard before.
Ignore the snot rocket nully, he didn’t like discussing the finer points of Islam with me.
He didn’t like the direct quotes from the quran.
And he’s an Obama bot, anything insulting towards ‘The One’ is cause for the jamese777 to crawl from under his rock in a rage.
*Treason presupposes he is actually a citizen. Otherwise he is a non-uniformed enemy combatant, you might consider reviewing the Geneva Conventions approved method of addressing such.
Hey, you had your lunch taken from you the last time we tangled.
You wanted to excuse islam, failed, then tried to make it about Bush.
There will be no eligibility requirements that affect Obummer in 2012. No republican (socialist) will dare challenge the One.
The Big Boo
Here is the problem with this.
It is noise. And non-useful noise.
The legal birth father of Obama is...Obama senior. That is the absolute legal and relevant FACT.
This LEGAL fact was established and is anchored by the Stanley Ann / Obama Sr. divorce. Though the marriage is murky, the divorce is not. It is on file and even has a redacted or removed page from the documents.
To undo Obama Senior as father, you would have to undo that divorce - legally. With the parties of that divorce deceased that is not going to happen.
So this is interesting tabloid stuff. But from legal, Constitutional aspect - it matters not.
This detracts from the issue - natural citizenship. That is the issue - regardless of birth location. So it is playing into the hands of those that obscure that fact to open conjecture about other biological fathers. Because then people can say - “well maybe he is NOT the son of a foreigner and so if that is the case AND he was born in Hawaii then he would qualify a natural born Citizen.” So it gives hope of avoiding the usurpation issue. But there is not possibility of another father legally. Its BHO Sr. And that can not be changed for all practical purposes.
Remember:
“Son of Brit (and even still a Brit) ain’t legit.”
Nope. Unless and until an actual birth certificate demonstrating that parentage surfaces, legally it's just hearsay...
I want a treason* and sabotage trial with its inevitable conclusion and punishment.
*Treason presupposes he is actually a citizen. Otherwise he is a non-uniformed enemy combatant, you might consider reviewing the Geneva Conventions approved method of addressing such.
Thanks for admitting that Holder is a useless worthless waste of air.
Me too!
The First Time I Heard of Barack (with additional info)
Here’s his written confession which happened to a physicist when he was in Russia:
The leader of the Communist Party USA may not be the only one doing Communist cartwheels. Brace yourself for what I’m about to say next. Last fall, prior to the presidential election, a friend of mine, Dr. Wiley Drake, former second vice president for the Southern Baptist Convention, sent me an e-mail on which I didn’t report. It just seemed too extreme. It was from a software developer
he met named Tom Fife who told of how he first heard of the name “Barack.”
All I know is that Tom Fife is a real guy – not some e-mail scam. I’ve talked to him. He was a government contractor with an active security clearance who took notes on his trips for debriefings with the Defense Intelligence Agency within the Department of Defense. This is what he wrote down after it happened in 1992, before anyone ever heard the name “Barack”:
The first time I heard of Barack
During the period of roughly February 1992 to mid-1994, I was making frequent trips to Moscow, Russia, in the process of starting a software development joint-venture company with some people from the Russian scientific community. One of the men in charge on the Russian side was named V. M.; he had a wife named T.M.
V. was a level-headed scientist, while his wife was rather deeply committed to the losing Communist cause – a cause she obviously was not abandoning.
One evening, during a trip early in 1992, the American half of our venture were invited to V. & T.’s Moscow flat as we were about to return to the States. The party went well and we had the normal dinner discussions.
As the evening wore on, T. developed a decidedly rough anti-American edge – one her husband tried to quietly rein in.
The bottom line of the tirade she started against the United States went something like this:
“You Americans always like to think that you have the perfect government and your people are always so perfect. Well then, why haven’t you had a woman president by now? You had a chance to vote for a woman vice president and you didn’t do it.”
The general response went something along the lines that you don’t vote for someone just because of their sex. Besides, you don’t vote for vice president, but the president and vice president as a ticket.
“Well, I think you are going to be surprised when you get a black president very soon.”
The consensus we expressed was that we didn’t think there was anything innately barring that. The right person at the right time and sure, America would try to vote for the right person, be he or she, black or not.
“What if I told you that you will have a black president very soon and he will be a Communist?”
The out-of-the-blue remark was met by our stares. She continued, “Well, you will; and he will be a Communist.”
It was then that the husband unsuccessfully tried to change the subject; but she was on a roll and would have nothing of it. One of us asked, “It sounds like you know something we don’t know.”
“Yes, it is true. This is not some idle talk. He is already born, and he is educated and being groomed to be president right now. You will be impressed to know that he has gone to the best schools of presidents. He is what you call ‘Ivy League.’ You don’t believe me, but he is real and I even know his name. His name is Barack. His mother is white and American and his father is black from Africa. That’s right, a chocolate baby! And he’s going to be your president.”
She became more and more smug as she presented her stream of detailed knowledge and predictions so matter-of-factly – as though all were foregone conclusions. “It’s all been thought out. His father is not an American black, so he won’t have that social slave stigma. He is intelligent and he is half white and has been raised from the cradle to be an atheist and a Communist. He’s gone to the finest schools. He is being guided every step of the way and he will be irresistible to America.”
We sat there not knowing what to say. She was obviously very happy that the Communists were doing this and that it would somehow be a thumbing of their collective noses at America: They would give us a black president and he’d be a Communist to boot. She made it quite obvious that she thought that this was going to breathe new life into world Communism. From this and other conversations with her, she always asserted that Communism was far from dead.
She was full of little details about him that she was eager to relate. I thought that maybe she was trying to show off that this truly was a real person and not just hot air.
She rattled off a complete litany. He was from Hawaii. He went to school in California. He lived in Chicago. He was soon to be elected to the Legislature. “Have no doubt: he is one of us, a Soviet.”
At one point, she related some sort of San Francisco connection, but I didn’t understand what the point was and don’t recall much about that. I was just left with the notion that she considered the city to be some sort of a center for their activity here.
Since I had dabbled in languages, I knew a smattering of Arabic. I made a comment: “If I remember correctly, ‘Barack’ comes from the Arabic word for ‘Blessing.’ That seems to be an odd name for an American.” She replied quickly, “Yes. It is ‘African,’” she insisted, “and he will be a blessing for world Communism. We will regain our strength and become the number one power in the world.”
She continued with something to the effect that America was at the same time the great hope and the great obstacle for Communism. America would have to be converted to Communism, and Barack was going to pave the way.
So, what does this conversation from 1992 prove?
Well, it’s definitely anecdotal. It doesn’t prove that Obama has had Soviet Communist training nor that he was groomed to be the first black American president, but it does show one thing that I think is very important. It shows that Soviet Russian Communists knew of Barack from a very early date. It also shows that they truly believed among themselves that he was raised and groomed Communist to pave the way for their future. This report on Barack came personally to me from one of them long before America knew he existed.
Although I had never before heard of him, at the time of this conversation Obama was 30-plus years old and was obviously tested enough that he was their anticipated rising star.
There have been attempts to discredit Fife with made up details, but the original version of Fife’s story is posted online. Fife can be reached at: thefife@hotmail.com.
How crazy is it that we know more about the childhood of George Washington than we do about Obama?
The Founders would suffer group projectile vomiting if they’d heard of it.
Then they’d break out the tar and feathers.
I think they would also be ashamed of us as a nation.
Actually it's not. There's a legal principle of "presumption of legitimacy" that goes back to the Middle Ages and beyond. The child of a married woman is legally presumed to be legitimate.
Nope. Unless and until an actual birth certificate demonstrating that parentage surfaces, legally it’s just hearsay...
______________________________________________________________________________________
I am sorry but it is not ‘hearsay’. There is a legally bonafide divorce on record in Hawaii. The documents of that divorce show a child as part of the marriage. Unless Obama Sr. ADOPTED Obama II as a stepchild, and nothing points to that, he (Obama Sr.) IS the legal birth father of Obama II.
Legally, the fatherhood is established and in the formal Hawaii records.
As noted, the released documents has a missing or possibly legally redacted page. In all likelihood this is a birth document of some type for the child. It is a fact that the child is not explicitly named in the remaining pages of the documents. But unless Stanly Ann and Obama Sr. had a different child it would have to be Obama II.
I am certainly not arguing against full transparency here. That should be done. That includes the original birth documents, even if they are under legal seal due to later closed adoption proceedings. But from what HAS been released the only conclusion of LEGAL fact is that Obama’s birth father was Obama Senior.
Any other scenarios seem to only serve to dull Occam’s razor on this key issue.
Thanks for admitting that Holder is a useless worthless waste of air.
The Founders would suffer group projectile vomiting if they’d heard of it.
Then they’d break out the tar and feathers.
I think they would also be ashamed of us as a nation.
The Founders made provisions for future generations to alter their original thinking. That’s why the Constitution has 27 Amendments. The 14th altered their thinking on citizenship. The 17th altered the Framers’ thinking on direct election of Senators and the 19th altered their thinking on women having the right to vote.
Posters that you will never see at an abortion clinic.
Indeed, Barack Obama is the culmination of decades of an agenda to convert America to communism.
“the unsubstantiated claim that he was born in Hawaii”
Ping to #8...................
“Who’s your Daddy, Obama?”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf1Vx8UyS_0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBgmpuubX1k
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.