Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Astronomy Picture of the Day -- MESSENGER's First Day
NASA ^ | October 08, 2011 | (see photo credit)

Posted on 10/08/2011 8:06:16 AM PDT by SunkenCiv

Explanation: One solar day on a planet is the length of time from noon to noon. A solar day lasts 24 hours on planet Earth. On Mercury a solar day is about 176 Earth days long. And during its first Mercury solar day in orbit the MESSENGER spacecraft has imaged nearly the entire surface of the innermost planet to generate a global monochrome map at 250 meters per pixel resolution and a 1 kilometer per pixel resolution color map. Examples of the maps, mosaics constructed from thousands of images made under uniform lighting conditions, are shown (monochrome at left), both centered along the planet's 75 degrees East longitude meridian. The MESSENGER spacecraft's second Mercury solar day will likely include more high resolution targeted observations of the planet's surface features. (Editor's note: Due to Mercury's 3:2 spin-orbit resonance, a Mercury solar day is 2 Mercury years long.)

October 08, 2011

(Excerpt) Read more at 129.164.179.22 ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Astronomy Picture of the Day; Science
KEYWORDS: apod; astronomy; mercury; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
[Credit: NASA/JHU APL/CIW]

1 posted on 10/08/2011 8:06:23 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Nice pictures though it seems like such a waste of resources since man would be incinerated if he attempted to make a landing there.

Still I have to give credit to NASA for a great picture.


2 posted on 10/08/2011 8:13:51 AM PDT by puppypusher (The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Bush’s fault. That’s what happens when you don’t re-elect Obama and give the planet a chance to heal.....


3 posted on 10/08/2011 8:14:38 AM PDT by JusPasenThru (HEY UNION MEMBER: INVEST IN YOUR OWN DAMN INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A CHANGE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brytlea; cripplecreek; decimon; bigheadfred; KoRn; Grammy; married21; steelyourfaith; Mmogamer; ...

4 posted on 10/08/2011 8:16:50 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

>>Nice pictures though it seems like such a waste of resources since man would be incinerated if he attempted to make a landing there.

Well, not really, if he landed on the back side he’d be frozen to death.

COULD YOU IMAGINE THE SUNRISE ON MERCURY THOUGH?


5 posted on 10/08/2011 8:17:32 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

Thanks, SunkenCiv, for all your postings, which provide us with nuggets of goodness amidst the political gloom.


6 posted on 10/08/2011 8:18:07 AM PDT by bkopto (Obama is merely a symptom of a more profound, systemic disease in American body politic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Right...so imagine the only ‘reasonably habitable’ temps would be a narrow band, running roughly north-south, where space zero meets sun melt...
I’ve always wondered what that’s like.


7 posted on 10/08/2011 8:27:38 AM PDT by spankalib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JusPasenThru

Looks like the Moon, which is probably why this pic makes it look like Mercury’s mooning us.


8 posted on 10/08/2011 8:27:56 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

Silly, they’ll go at night.


9 posted on 10/08/2011 8:28:10 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher
man would be incinerated if he attempted to make a landing there.

Only on the day side (mercury is tidally locked) and the right kind of thermal shielding would make a dayside landing feasible. At this point there's no reason to land but mercury is rich in heavy metals and may be prime mining territory in the distant future.
10 posted on 10/08/2011 8:30:04 AM PDT by cripplecreek (MLB Playoff thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2786167/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

11 posted on 10/08/2011 8:31:30 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle; spankalib

The day is 176 Earth days long, so, plenty of time to explore the night-side surface, given the probable length of the mission. Mercury’s one of the handful of Solar System destinations possible for human landfall.

Of course, the night-side surface will be explored by starlight. There’s no twilight, because Mercury’s got very little atmosphere, despite its density.


12 posted on 10/08/2011 8:31:45 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

My pleasure, and thanks for the kind remarks.


13 posted on 10/08/2011 8:31:52 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Mercury is tidally locked but there is some sun movement in the sky due to its somewhat elliptical orbit. As I understand it, near the terminator between day and night there are 3 sunrises and 3 sunsets per mercurian day for some reason.


14 posted on 10/08/2011 8:33:02 AM PDT by cripplecreek (MLB Playoff thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2786167/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Thanks JPB! Nice link, btw.


15 posted on 10/08/2011 8:33:02 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Thanks for the MLB thread link!


16 posted on 10/08/2011 8:33:12 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I’m going to start a new thread for the ALCS and NLCS playoffs this afternoon and will post the link in my tagline for that too.


17 posted on 10/08/2011 8:34:58 AM PDT by cripplecreek (MLB Playoff thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2786167/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I was wrong about it being tidally locked but its got an odd orbit to axis rotation ratio. 3 days take 2 mercurian years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_%28planet%29


18 posted on 10/08/2011 8:38:36 AM PDT by cripplecreek (MLB Playoff thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2786167/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Mercury’s axial tilt is almost zero,[75] with the best measured value as low as 0.027 degrees.[7] This is significantly smaller than that of Jupiter, which has the second smallest axial tilt of all planets at 3.1 degrees. This means that to an observer at Mercury’s poles, the center of the Sun never rises more than 2.1 arcminutes above the horizon.[7]

At certain points on Mercury’s surface, an observer would be able to see the Sun rise about halfway, then reverse and set before rising again, all within the same Mercurian day. This is because approximately four days before perihelion, Mercury’s angular orbital velocity exactly equals its angular rotational velocity so that the Sun’s apparent motion ceases; at perihelion, Mercury’s angular orbital velocity then exceeds the angular rotational velocity. Thus, the Sun appears to move in a retrograde direction. Four days after perihelion, the Sun’s normal apparent motion resumes at these points.[18]”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_planet#Orbit_and_rotation


19 posted on 10/08/2011 8:40:01 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: struggle; puppypusher; SunkenCiv
>>Nice pictures though it seems like such a waste of resources since man would be incinerated if he attempted to make a landing there.

Well, not really, if he landed on the back side he’d be frozen to death.

Are there areas where the porridge is just right?

20 posted on 10/08/2011 8:41:24 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson