Skip to comments.
Brothel Patrons Have No Legal Expectation of Privacy, Judge Rules
Wired News
| 01.28.13
| David Kravets
Posted on 02/04/2013 8:37:22 PM PST by Slings and Arrows
Title and link only.
TOPICS: Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: abortion; activistjudge; cultureofcorruption; doublestandard; homosexualagenda; judicialactivism; napl; privacyrights; sexworkers
Not good for business. Men won't want to expose their shortcomings.
To: Slings and Arrows; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; ...
2
posted on
02/04/2013 8:39:03 PM PST
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: Slings and Arrows
Judges -- they find privacy when they want to, but can't find it when they don't want to. The Constitution? It covers privacy in the penumbra; except when it doesn't.
We were promised a government of laws and not men, but that went away a long, long time ago.
4
posted on
02/04/2013 8:41:23 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(Nothing will change until after the war.)
To: Slings and Arrows; a fool in paradise
The judge came down hard on the limp miscreants! Look out Sandra Fluke, yes, you too!
5
posted on
02/04/2013 8:46:57 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
To: ClearCase_guy
Where Judges err, they can be set right, by appeal, by law, by amendment.
You just have to have a reason why they erred, and convince people enough to win elections.
6
posted on
02/04/2013 8:49:29 PM PST
by
donmeaker
(Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
To: donmeaker
Roe v Wade was a “privacy” issue — I’m still waiting for someone to fix that one by appeal, by law, by amendment.
7
posted on
02/04/2013 8:56:49 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(Nothing will change until after the war.)
To: ClearCase_guy
To win by law or amendment you have to convince a lot of people.
Simple legislative law could deny the SCOTUS jurisdiction. Setting jurisdiction is a power of Congress.
8
posted on
02/04/2013 10:12:05 PM PST
by
donmeaker
(Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
To: Slings and Arrows
If this is in France...I would say a non issue.
To: Slings and Arrows
Cool. I guess that means I can put those videos of 4 Democrat judges banging little girls up on You Tube.
10
posted on
02/04/2013 10:39:27 PM PST
by
Dick Bachert
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." T. Jefferson)
To: Dick Bachert
11
posted on
02/04/2013 11:34:10 PM PST
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Slings and Arrows
Darn small Iphone keyboard. It was 47. Dropped the 7.
12
posted on
02/05/2013 12:23:39 AM PST
by
Dick Bachert
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." T. Jefferson)
To: Dick Bachert
I find this all too feasible.
13
posted on
02/05/2013 12:34:51 AM PST
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Slings and Arrows; raccoonradio
To: Slings and Arrows; raccoonradio
To: Slings and Arrows
... take note, Secret Service: they’ve taken the “secret” out of being serviced....
16
posted on
02/05/2013 5:30:13 AM PST
by
Chad N. Freud
(FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
To: ClearCase_guy
Same sex sodomy was also considered a “privacy” issue yet taking dope at hope (as those two men were ALSO doing) is not.
Neither is paying for sex outside of a brothel state. Unless it’s dinner and jewelry.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
