Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Conservatives Misunderstand Moviemaking (Getting Hollywood not quite right)
Pajamas Media ^ | 03/20/2013 | Andrew Klavan

Posted on 03/20/2013 8:24:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

From The Bible: Satan… or Obama… Like, whichever.

Daniel Wattenberg, the arts and features editor of the conservative Washington Times, wrote a piece last week chiding Hollywood for being confounded by the ratings success of the History channel’s mini-series The Bible. ”Blockbuster ratings for a compilation of bible stories from a reality TV producer taking his first crack at drama? Can’t be,” Wattenberg writes in the persona of a studio exec. “If there was a market for biblical epics, then Hollywood wouldn’t have long ago abandoned the genre. … Makes no sense.”

No one can blame Wattenberg for taking a poke at Hollywood’s apparent reluctance to capitalize on the huge audience of the faithful. As I myself have joked repeatedly, if The Passion of the Christ had been about anything else, the Book of Acts would already be in the can.

But just for the record, no one in Hollywood is baffled by The Bible’s success. I think The Passion of the Christ blowout took them aback a little, but everyone gets it now: There’s a large audience of religious people who are tired of being mocked and put down by a small cadre of coastal sophisticates, but who will show up for solid, non-pandering faith-based entertainment. They’re not stupid; they’re not changing their minds; they’re not going away.

So why isn’t there more good work for the faithful? The problem is not Hollywood cluelessness, nor is it Hollywood evil. Conservatives tend to over-emphasize both.

“It’s a good script… it just needs some development.”

Just in the nature of things, you aren’t going to find a lot of stupid people succeeding in the entertainment business. It’s too competitive; the dumb die young. People in movies and TV have to invest tens, sometimes hundreds, of millions of dollars, plus a lot of time and sweat, on the off-chance of touching the hearts of the audience. No one knows what will work and what won’t. And even when you have a good property, there are so many moving parts — including a large number of temperamental and unreliable creative people like myself — that almost anything can go wrong along the way. You have to be sharp and lucky to stay in the game.

The people I meet in Hollywood aren’t bad people either. There are some true creeps, narcissists, and belligerents — that’s in the nature of a business in which huge amounts of money can be made through ego and fakery. But most of the people I’ve met are decent, funny, hard-working, and genuinely eager to entertain with high-quality material.

If conservatives and the religious are excluded, mocked, and even blacklisted in Hollywood — and yes, they are — the problem arises primarily through provincialism. The people who are attracted to the biz tend to be more left-wing and secular than the rest of us. The more they congregate, the more they tend to demonize people unlike themselves. Pretty soon, they become convinced that, while personally flawed, they are nonetheless one of the good guys, and that those who disagree with them are the bad guys. This feeling is encouraged by a small but powerful group of politically minded activists doling out rewards for right thinking and punishments for error. Believe me, I’ve seen these phenomena among conservatives too.

What’s more, no matter what you think you know, no one goes into the arts for money alone. Those who tell you Hollywood is about profit and nothing else either aren’t in the business or are in denial. In the old days, when Hollywood was run by businessmen, money more or less ruled. Now, that old order has been overturned. Creative people including actors, directors, and even writers have a lot more power. They instigate projects and can even push them down the road to completion. Money and profits are still important factors, but there’s a lot of other stuff in the mix. Prestige, awards, glamour, creative satisfaction, the respect of people you respect, pretty girls, whatever.

So… when a bunch of people who trend left and secular are making films to win the praise and respect of other people who trend left and secular — egged on by a handful of powerful executives and reviewers and stars and politicians who will go out of their way to praise them for leftism and punish them for speaking kindly of God, country, Republicans, or conservative values — you get the situation you have now.

The way to change that situation is for conservatives and believers… to complain, yes… but also to get involved — get involved as creators, executives, financiers, reviewers, award-givers, and as a vocal audience demanding what they want.

Do that — and The Bible will just be the beginning.



TOPICS: History; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: bibleseries; conservatives; film; historychannel; hollywood; markburnett; romadowney; thebible

1 posted on 03/20/2013 8:24:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I do not know whether it is true, but I heard on BOR that both Downing and Burnett are a bunch liberal obamatrons.


2 posted on 03/20/2013 8:26:51 AM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Ted Cruz is my adoptive Senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This writer doesn’t know what he wants.

On the one hand, Hollywood people aren’t so bad. On the other hand, they blacklist conservatives and religious people.

On the third hand, those blacklisted people are supposed to ‘get involved’ as financiers.

On the fourth hand, even though money evidently isn’t the issue when pretty girls are to be found, all studios need to profit to stay in business.

Make up your mind and get back to us.


3 posted on 03/20/2013 8:44:01 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I like Klavan, but how do we demand what we want? Should we put an ad in the paper demanding Hollyweird execs make movies we want? How far will that go? During the Iraq war, every single movie made about the war was either anti-Iraq war or non-confrontational. There was not one single movie that championed the war. Or even a movie that depicted a battle. For instance, a movie about the Marines taking Fallujah would have scored big at the box office. It was never made. Probably never considered.

There's lots of other conservative -themed topics that will never be made. "Passion.." was made because Mel Gibson made it happen. I won't hold my breath waiting for another conservative-themed flick to come out.

4 posted on 03/20/2013 8:44:36 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not so easy for Christians or conservatives to “get involved.”

If they reveal what they really believe, they’ll be shown the door, or put to work sweeping the floors. And if they hide it, they need to live a lie of silence most of the time, never talking about what they really think during working hours.

And at what level are they free to open their mouths and suggest that it might be a good idea to make a really moral, Christian movie? Not even a director can do that, without having the producers and the money guys down on him.

Much likelier that you might persuade the buffoons who run things to hold their noses and hire some outsider Christians to make some movies. Or advise them on how not to drive most of their audiences away.

The same with academia and the public schools. I think maybe the only thing possible is be to start a new operation, completely separate, with clean money, rather than try to fix what has been corrupted over so many years. The corruption is entrenched.


5 posted on 03/20/2013 8:45:38 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If Hollywood took on the bible, Jesus and his disciples would be 13 gay men who were trying to figure out their sexuality.

It would no doubt be nominated for best picture.


6 posted on 03/20/2013 8:46:14 AM PDT by skinndogNN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I thought that this was a pretty fair article, even if it only stated what I already know. (For the record, I am trying to break into the industry myself.)


7 posted on 03/20/2013 9:08:10 AM PDT by LovedSinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftless2
[H]ow do we demand what we want?

Though money is not the only thing driving Hollywood, they still consume a lot of it and if the well goes dry then they'll stop putting out liberal propaganda. So make the well go dry.

Or to be more specific, make the well go dry on Hollywood products that are liberal propaganda or which have outspoken liberals in the cast/director, etc. And in contrast, make sure to support Hollywood (or other film/TV) products that support a conservative perspective or recognized conservatives in cast/crew.

That means you don't go to movies very often. I refuse to watch Avatar, for example. And I won't watch anything with a long list of actors and other activists in it. I saw Avengers before Joss Whedon came out with his anti-capitalist rant and won't be supporting anything else he does.

That means you don't watch a lot of prime-time / big network TV. That means you occasionally send a letter to the corporate offices of a studios reminding them that you aren't supporting their products and why. That's not a 'demand' but it is a statement that they will respect . . . or go broke.

And then you get a lot of other people to do the same, starting with your friends. If we are even approximately a center-right country, then there are at least 100 million people who feel like 'something should be done.' Get them to do something. This note is one of the things that I am 'doing' about it.
8 posted on 03/20/2013 9:29:52 AM PDT by Phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: driftless2

“During the Iraq war, every single movie made about the war was either anti-Iraq war or non-confrontational. There was not one single movie that championed the war.”

I don’t think a single one of them made a profit, either, at least until “The Hurt Locker”.


9 posted on 03/20/2013 9:32:03 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Phlyer

The wife and I haven’t attended a movie at a movie theater in ten years. We do subscribe to several premium cable movie channels of which I am imploring her to cancel. She says they come with a package deal for our cable bill, so we can’t cancel for a year or two. But at the first opportunity, out they go.


10 posted on 03/20/2013 10:23:10 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

bfl


11 posted on 03/20/2013 10:48:13 AM PDT by spankalib (The downside of liberty is the need to tolerate those who despise it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The problem is not Hollywood cluelessness, nor is it Hollywood evil. Conservatives tend to over-emphasize both.

B-O-L-O-G-N-A.

12 posted on 03/20/2013 4:33:01 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The author should try pitching a Christian script to Hollywood producers and see what it gets him. “Get involved” is advice far more easily given than taken.


13 posted on 03/20/2013 4:37:12 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
"The same with academia and the public schools. I think maybe the only thing possible is be to start a new operation, completely separate, with clean money, rather than try to fix what has been corrupted over so many years.<'B> The corruption is entrenched."

Agree. I had not thought of clean money or clean cut from "corruption...[that] is entrenched."

Need a financier like Trump, I guess.

14 posted on 03/24/2013 10:17:16 AM PDT by hummingbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LovedSinner
"(For the record, I am trying to break into the industry myself.)"

Best wishes, LovedSinner!

15 posted on 03/24/2013 10:18:35 AM PDT by hummingbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Phlyer
"That means you don't watch a lot of prime-time / big network TV."

I started opting out of "prime-time/big network TV" some time ago.

Haven't missed it and I've got a lot more time for reading...The Bible!

16 posted on 03/24/2013 10:23:14 AM PDT by hummingbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird

Thank you!


17 posted on 03/24/2013 3:08:26 PM PDT by LovedSinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird
I'm sure that my reading time is much greater than my watching-TV time. However, I admit that I tend to read a lot of history, rather than just the Bible. On the other hand, I do read at least a little in the Bible every day.

I think your solution is excellent.
18 posted on 03/25/2013 11:16:11 AM PDT by Phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson