Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The images of Stonehenge they DON’T want you to see
www.ancient-code.com ^

Posted on 09/18/2017 6:36:00 AM PDT by BenLurkin

Sadly, the truth is that the monument we see today was rebuilt as far back as 1901 when restoration process caused great outrage but was rarely referred to in official guidebooks.

William Gowland oversaw the first major restoration of the monument which involved the straightening and concrete setting of sarsen stone number 56 which was in danger of falling. In straightening the stone he moved it about half a meter from its original position.

During the 1920 restoration William Hawley, who had excavated nearby Old Sarum, excavated the base of six stones and the outer ditch. Richard Atkinson, Stuart Piggott and John F. S. Stone re-excavated much of Hawley’s work in the 1940s and 1950s and discovered the carved axes and daggers on the Sarsen Stones.

In 1958 the stones were restored again when three of the standing sarsens were re-erected and set in concrete bases. The last restoration was carried out in 1963 after stone 23 of the Sarsen Circle fell over.

Cambridge University archeological archivist and leading Stonehenge author Christopher Chippindale admitted: ‘Not much of what we see at Stonehenge hasn’t been touched in some way’. And historical research student Brian Edwards, who recently revealed that the nearby Avebury Monument had been totally rebuilt, has found rare pictures of Stonehenge being restored. He said: ‘It has been as if Stonehenge had been historically cleansed’. ‘For too long people have been kept in the dark over the Stonehenge restoration work. I am astonished by how few people know about it. It is wonderful the guide book is going to tell the full story in the future.’

(Excerpt) Read more at ancient-code.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: stonehenge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 09/18/2017 6:36:00 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

An awesome sight even with all the fencing around it.


2 posted on 09/18/2017 6:37:51 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Very cool to know.

At 64 I’d never heard of these recent reconstructions.


3 posted on 09/18/2017 6:42:09 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Monty Python: Archaeology Today http://youtu.be/Ww06W9N8prc

Aside ...

If tall men prefer short women and short men prefer short women then what do tall women get?

Cats, mostly...


4 posted on 09/18/2017 6:51:45 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

5 posted on 09/18/2017 6:52:23 AM PDT by Larry Lucido (Take Covfefe Ree Zig!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Ancient Erector Set?


6 posted on 09/18/2017 6:54:40 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Maybe! Although I personally think Merlin did it, lol.


7 posted on 09/18/2017 6:55:18 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Does that mean the Druids will have to find some other place to go to celebrate the Solistice?


8 posted on 09/18/2017 6:58:36 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Constantly doing things in opposition to human nature is insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Looks like the restoration was pretty good:

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

. Maryhill, Washington

9 posted on 09/18/2017 6:58:40 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (Women who are 25 pounds overweight tend to live longer than the men who mention it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

That was a funny scene.


10 posted on 09/18/2017 7:03:09 AM PDT by laplata (Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Some of the ancients were incredibly smart humans. Others? Headshake.

Craftsmanship is partially a genetic trait, some expansions on that of course are acquired.

Men and Women generally have strong inherited traits. Some skills are very rare between both groups. Men are men, women are women. Some things don’t change.

Life experience is a teacher for those who are observant.


11 posted on 09/18/2017 7:04:54 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

bump


12 posted on 09/18/2017 7:20:08 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

“An awesome sight even with all the fencing around it”

Saw it as a kid back in 1977, no fences then. you could walk right up to them. I think they added the rope fence later that same year. Good idea, I did see some graffiti on some stones.


13 posted on 09/18/2017 7:22:24 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Ping.


14 posted on 09/18/2017 7:27:09 AM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Don't check the news, check Cernovich on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DAC21

Yes, I know. I first visited it in 1996 and, of course, the fencing was up.


15 posted on 09/18/2017 7:28:56 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

bkmk


16 posted on 09/18/2017 7:29:01 AM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is Mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

So the mystery of how the stones were placed and when, isn’t such a mystery after all...


17 posted on 09/18/2017 7:29:56 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

What if all along this place was just a big toilet?


18 posted on 09/18/2017 7:36:22 AM PDT by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

When my husband ws\as young, in the late 50’s-early 60’s, he said you could go right up to the stones. When I first visited in 1983, they were roped off but, you could get quite close. Haven’t gone there in years.


19 posted on 09/18/2017 7:37:56 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Spruce

Everyone knows Stonehenge was a landing pad for space aliens to dock their space ship man.


20 posted on 09/18/2017 7:38:38 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson