Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Att'y Roy Black: Rush Was in Constant Pain
NewsMax ^ | 10/13/03 | Limbacher

Posted on 10/13/2003 8:45:07 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last
To: blastdad51
"The distintion will be lost on the left!!"

Interesting... so the Right now is the champion of delving into the reasons behind why a crime is commmitted ...
... are we to assume that the Right now feels that certain crimes should NOT be prosecuted, sort of like medical Pot ?
21 posted on 10/13/2003 9:13:30 PM PDT by RS (nc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Empireoftheatom48; tbird5
That's been bugging me all along. I remember him talking about playing 36 holes in a day.

I can't imagine doing this with chronic back and neck pain, drugs or not. I'm afraid that there is more to this story than has been revealed so far.
22 posted on 10/13/2003 9:13:34 PM PDT by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Humidston

His detractors claim he was involved in his drug problem when he made his statement about jailing drug people - IN 1995.

Could that be related to why his detractors don't seem to be able to find this?

1) Legalize all drugs so we can control their sources by holding them accountable to claims of safety & efficacy.

2) Treat all addictive drugs the same as tobbacco.

 

Transcript Of Rush Limbaugh On Legalizing Drugs
March 12, 1998

RUSH:

** Based on the reality of how we're going after cigarette smokers, The thing that we cannot do in the drug fight right now is regulate because it's illegal.  Drugs are against the law and so the manufacturers are illegal.  They're not even on shore they're down there in Columbia and the Calli Cartel and they're working to poison the brains and minds of the future of America.  And so what we do is to try to keep those drugs from getting in.  And I agree with you that it's a half baked effort. 

** But what are we doing with cigarettes.  Well we are punishing the manufacturers We're suing them left and right we're going to cause them to settle out of court for $368 billion.  We're gonna let them keep making them but then we're going to have the price go way way up so that we ostensibly say by virtue of that we don't want anybody to smoke cigarettes anymore and we're going to try to price it out of most peoples existence but we're going to raise those prices and most of that money will be taxes and we're going to use that money for health care programs for our kids and so forth. 

*** It seems to me that what is missing in the drug fight is legalization.  If we want to go after drugs with the same fervor and intensity with which we go after cigarettes let's legalize drugs.  Legalize the manufacture of drugs.  Licence the Calli Cartel make them tax payers and then sue them.  Sue them left and right and then get control of the price and generate tax revenue from it.  Raise the price sky high and fund all sorts of other wonderful social programs. 

**** Because it seems to me, flippant as though it may sound to you, that what gives us the power to do what we're doing, what gives the government the _power_ to do what it is doing, state and federal, in cigarettes is that it's a legal substance regulated by uh the federal government.  And they don't have any such power and control over drugs because it's illegal. 

**** So let's legalize them and then go after them the same way. 


23 posted on 10/13/2003 9:14:35 PM PDT by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Humidston
I certainly can't answer your question, but maybe his meds allowed it?
Bingo,but even then it provided a modicum of relief.
24 posted on 10/13/2003 9:16:29 PM PDT by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow.....The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Humidston
Absolutely. Marta is surely hurting too and can use all the prayers she can get.
25 posted on 10/13/2003 9:17:36 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Democrats take themselves seriously -everyone else takes them to be seriously flawed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Humidston
When was his back operation?
26 posted on 10/13/2003 9:18:40 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: arjay
It will also be lost on the libertarian members of this forum.

My mom got Osteo(sp?) Arthritus before she passed on. When her kidneys gave out, they put her on dialisis. They made her lay flat on her back, and she couldn't stand the pain. She asked for the doctor to drug her up and let her die. He did.

27 posted on 10/13/2003 9:18:43 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Have you donated to the Salvation Army this week? How have you helped a lost soul today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Very interesting find, Ancient Geezer!
28 posted on 10/13/2003 9:18:43 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
"Sue them left and right and then get control of the price and generate tax revenue from it. Raise the price sky high and fund all sorts of other wonderful social programs."

Did you not realize Rush's sacasm when you read it ?
29 posted on 10/13/2003 9:19:57 PM PDT by RS (nc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I don't know, Howlin. But Roy Black says this started in 1997. I'm not sure if the pain killers began then or the surgery...
30 posted on 10/13/2003 9:20:14 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Humidston
I just don't ever remember him being gone for any length of time.
31 posted on 10/13/2003 9:21:39 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RS
go back and reread my post
32 posted on 10/13/2003 9:23:23 PM PDT by blastdad51 (Proud father of an Enduring Freedom vet, and friend of a soldier lost in Afghanistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Who is anyone to judge?

Another side...

How many ex-athletes are living in pain beyond most people's comprehension, yet dealing with it? How many back problems are there? How many knees or shoulders were operated on/should have been? Consider all of the devastating arthritis?... People get by in pain without all of the meds.

Rush said he was no victim, I found that to be very meaningful.

33 posted on 10/13/2003 9:23:46 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
ping!
34 posted on 10/13/2003 9:24:33 PM PDT by nutmeg (Rush Limbaugh: The Voice of Sanity during 8 years of the Clinton Reign of Terror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I know. I've been racking my brain. Somewhere around the mid '90's I'm guessing, but at that time I really wasn't much of a regular listener. Maybe someone else would know.
35 posted on 10/13/2003 9:24:48 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
And what is that evidence of? Truthfully, I've known people who have had multiple back surgeries. And of course, immediately after the surgery proper they needed to be relatively immobile---but they were not stuck at the hospital. I can't say this for sure, of course, but it wouldn't surprise me if he did his radio show while convalescing. It's not like we had the dittocam back then to check up on him.
36 posted on 10/13/2003 9:25:20 PM PDT by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ancient_geezer
Why, this bond is forfeit;
And blindly by this the Dopers may claim
A pound of pot, to be by them cut off
Nearest Limbaugh's heart...
37 posted on 10/13/2003 9:25:41 PM PDT by LRS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969
I asked a simple question.

Try not to look so damn defensive.
38 posted on 10/13/2003 9:26:39 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Humidston
What surprises me is that I don't remember him talking about; and lord knows, he talks about everything that happens to him!
39 posted on 10/13/2003 9:27:13 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RS
Sarcasm? The best sarcasm always has the grain of truth in it my friend.

The position of legalization of drugs is solid, as long as the worst drugs are illegal there can be no substantive control over them anymore than there was over alcohol in prohibition.

As far as law suits etc? Hold drugs to truth in advertising and the same standards as tobacco. Works for me.
40 posted on 10/13/2003 9:28:49 PM PDT by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson