Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Budget Details Shifting Of Funds To Exploration (Great Budget Outline)
Aviation Week and World Report (Aerospace Daily) ^ | February 3, 2004 | By Jefferson Morris

Posted on 02/03/2004 3:50:10 PM PST by vannrox

NASA's fiscal year 2005 budget spells out the agency's strategy for reprogramming $11.6 billion in funding over the next five years to support its new space exploration program.

Before the loss of the shuttle Columbia, NASA planned to spend roughly $86 billion total over the five-year period starting in 2005. The FY '05 budget proposes redirecting approximately $11.6 billion of that funding, as well as adding $1 billion, to implement the president's space exploration goals (DAILY, Jan. 15).

About $5.9 billion will be shifted from the agency's Space Launch Initiative (SLI), which includes efforts such as the Orbital Space Plane (OSP) and the Next Generation Launch Technology (NGLT) program, from FY '05 through FY '09. OSP contractors Lockheed Martin and Boeing already have been ordered to turn their attention to the agency's proposed Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV), which is scheduled to have its first test flight by the end of the decade (DAILY, Jan. 16).

NASA also plans to divert $1.5 billion from the space shuttle program to its exploration effort over the next five years. The shuttle is scheduled for retirement in 2010, immediately after completing construction of the International Space Station (ISS). Twenty-five to 30 shuttle flights will be required to complete the ISS.

NASA plans to save $1.2 billion from the space station's research budget through FY '09 by cutting research that does not directly support the president's new space vision, according to NASA. ISS research is being redirected to focus on the long-term effects of the space environment on human physiology.

The remaining reprogrammed funds include $2.7 billion to be saved by delaying the launch of various Earth science and space science missions, with most slipping a year or two. NASA also plans to cut $300 million in space technology development efforts.

"Achieving this new vision for space exploration will not be easy," say budget documents released Feb. 2. "It will require a commitment to a focused and responsible multiyear budget, starting in 2005."

Exploration Systems

NASA's topline budget request for fiscal year 2005 is roughly $16.2 billion, up from $15.4 billion in FY '04. The agency's Earth science budget is being cut from $1.613 billion in FY '04 to $1.485 billion in FY '05. The agency's education budget also is being reduced, from $226 million in FY '04 down to $169 million.

The FY '05 budget includes $1.852 billion for Exploration Systems, which includes work under three themes: Lunar Exploration, Human and Robotic Technology, and Transportation Systems.

Lunar Exploration will define the requirements for a planetary surface exploration architecture to be tested on the moon. In 2009, NASA plans to begin launching robotic missions to better characterize the moon's surface and resources in anticipation of a human landing by 2020.

Human and Robotic Technology will develop technologies that can be integrated into lunar exploration missions and applied to other NASA enterprises, according to budget documents. Transportation systems will provide crew transfer systems to support missions to the moon, Mars, and beyond, including the CEV.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: budget; explore; federal; mars; moon; nasa; rocket; science; space; star
Very Intersting.
1 posted on 02/03/2004 3:50:14 PM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Lots of changes going on.. Hopefully we can get some tech that's out of the 90's/00's instead of the 60's/70's we use today.
2 posted on 02/03/2004 3:51:22 PM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox; All
Cross-link:

-2004- the Year of Returning to Space--

3 posted on 02/03/2004 4:15:31 PM PST by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the TrackBall into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2; XBob; wirestripper; whattajoke; VOR78; Virginia-American; Vinnie_Vidi_Vici; VadeRetro; ...




If you'd like to be on or off this MARS ping list please FRail me

4 posted on 02/03/2004 5:19:46 PM PST by Phil V.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
One of the more interesting aspects of this budget is that it will use alt-access to space. SpaceX could have a major role to play in all of this, their cost/lb. will be around $1500/lb. to LEO with the future heavy lift variant of Elon Musk's rockets coming in at less than $1000/lb. This makes all of our lunar plans more feasible within a limited budget.
5 posted on 02/03/2004 5:33:18 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Hopefully we can get some tech

We're doing robotics already. This will increase rapidly. The space race will be a robotics race, and robotics is all programming. Advantage: USA. Let's keep it that way.

6 posted on 02/03/2004 6:44:27 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
The remaining reprogrammed funds include $2.7 billion to be saved by delaying the launch of various Earth science and space science missions, with most slipping a year or two. NASA also plans to cut $300 million in space technology development efforts.

Looks like I should update my resume. Between these cuts and eliminating the UV planetary sounding rockets, one can't be too careful...

MD

7 posted on 02/03/2004 7:20:17 PM PST by MikeD (Green is the colour of her colour...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phil V.
Thanks for the ping!
8 posted on 02/03/2004 9:57:32 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson