Posted on 09/18/2004 11:28:44 PM PDT by Travis McGee
Freepers who helped to defeat the democrat election fraud in 2000 will want to obtain this new book by John Fund ASAP, in order to be ready for their tricks in November 2004.
I heard Fund on a radio talk show last week, briefly. He went into the scoop discovered on Free Republic in 2000, namely, how 15,000 Bush ballots were "spiked" in Palm Beach County. This was first discovered through statistical analysis by freeper Robert E. Cook, PE.
If you are not familiar with this method of vote fraud, here is how it was done: corrupt 'rat precincts held back their ballots in tight races, most flagrantly in Palm Beach County. At the last minute, stacks of ballots were "spiked" down the Gore hole. This did not change the Gore ballots, which already had their chads punched out in normal voting.
But every Bush vote was ruined, because with the Gore hole also knocked out (by the spike) it became an invalid double vote.
These 15,000 ruined Bush ballots were traced to certain corrupt late-reporting precincts. (The rest of the Republican candidates on these 15,000 ballots were not spiked or invalidated, leaving a clear trail of evidence of the 'rat fraud.)
This was exhaustively detailed here in late 2000, but in those days, an explosive scoop from Free Republic was simply unable to gain traction in the MSM, and the story languished and died.
I suggest that as many freepers as possible get hold of this book, first: for defense against many types of 'rat fraud in November, and second: in order to explain to people how the 'rats almost stole the election in Palm Beach in 2000 by "spiking" ballots.
"700 felony voter fraud investigations in all 50 states"
This seems to be one of MANY frauds attempts uncovered the last few weeks.. on a regular basis. 700 is a drop in the bucket. The Democrats are doing it knowing they have a great chance of getting away with it. The are HOPING some fraud attepts are uncovered because it works for them... they think
Heck this is at least 4 years in the making... what we can expect to find in a tip of the iceberg. They have been working at it and are far ahead of the voter registration folks and the Republicans. In fact I believe they have a number they EXPECT to be detected so the election registration folks "feel good" about the fraud they were able to uncovered. These though are only to hide the scale of how pervasive this is.
This election will make most banana republics look like the continental congress. Be ready for it, the signs are all there. All the recent detection's are just coverage haven't you read about all the "fraudulent registrations" that have been uncovered lately..in so many precincts and states?
See here is what I see happening. They think they win either way. If at the time of the vote thousands of fraudulent votes are discovered either thousands (hundreds of thousands) and this will cause one of several possibilities to happen.
If Kerry is the real winner (50/50 shot now?) the fact that Republicans continued to investigate was an attempt to over turn the "will of the people". They (with the aid of the MSM!) demonize the Republicans for years. Through out the whole thing the Dems attempt to get it in court and might succeed. See they feel safe with it going to the lower courts. When/if it goes to the SCOTUS they declare that court as being prejudiced and a Republican controlled farce... again MSM is critical here.
This they don't care about because serves for their side when Kerry nominates the replacements for the 3 or 4 expected to retire during the 8 years after the election.
If there was massive voter fraud and Bush was really the winner then a series of chances occur here. Either the vote is investigated and a large chunk of the fraud is uncovered and Bush is declared the winner (after 5 months of investigation) and they will still call it an attempt to over turn the "will of the people". They (with the aid of the MSM!) demonize the Republicans for years. Once again I am sure it will end up at SCOTUS and that will help them with their case for preventing conservative judges during the next 8 years.
Only this could be much worse and again they don't care because they will use that too. The other thing that could happen even if Bush is the real winner is that because of the massive scale of the voter fraud the election is declared null and a NEW election is called. The 'rats see this as an acceptable outcome also. Just more time to commit more fraud and use the press and their own shrill voices to demonize the right.
This also gives a chance that after the second election of 2004 is declared tainted the public is so worn out of the "hatred" and 'evil" of politics the Democrats' get the populace to join their cry to "just let the will of the people prevail"
Possibly Bush being a patriot and a good man finally concedes (for the good of the Union) or agrees to "terms" for Kerry to concede. Either way the Democrats see this as a win.... they are better at playing the PR/MSM/Public Opinion game.
You see the very complication of all of it will work in their favor. They know most of the general public can't pay attention to more than a sound bite. If a news anchor can't explain it in 60 seconds most will not follow the story. That is except for the die hard Right wingers on the Internet. Those can then be even further demonized.
I hope I am not right but the number of recent discoveries points to fraud almost beyond what we can believe but far beyond what the average person can believe... and so won't. Remember the one call they have made since the last election. Never again
This might mean to regular people never a close election again. To them I am sure that it really means never again will they do it on a small scale. IF they want to win they need to commit enough fraud to win or completely muck things up giving them a chance to win. No matter what the see the chance here to try to get the election and to try to destroy the Republican party.
So I think the fraud will be UNBELIEVABLE. They think they (with the help of the MSM) can win a PR battle either way. If Kerry is the real winner they win.. the investigations and civil uncertainty were the Rights fault. If Bush is the real winner they hope it can even then be made out that he stole the election again. If Bush is the real winner but the massiveness of the fraud enables them to get a new election called they still win.
They want the press involved, they want the courts involved, they want what ever edge they can get. They have been preparing for it. Expect to even see fraudulent Republican votes or voter registrations done by them to really throw things off......
Sadly this seems to be what explains the extensive numbers of fraud attempts being uncovered. Kerry's latest statements about not wanting "to let 1 million votes go uncounted" just in the last day or so is all part of this.
What about I think the Washington state senate election in 2000. On election night the Republican was ahead, the next day, still ahead. In that state the absentee ballots can come in as late as two weeks after the election day. The Democrat won in the end. Does anybody believe that the mostly-military ansentee vote actually went to the Democrat?
Maybe those were all "peace corp" absentee ballots.
And maybe monkey could fly out of Kerries Butt
THANKS.
SENT TO EMAIL LIST.
I'm beginning to think that if Bush doesn't win by an unquestionable landslide, the "FRAUD!" crowd on the left will be screeching, and will tie this election up in the courts once again.
They will attempt to commit fraud, there's no doubt. They've done it before (remember the OTHER JFK too?), they'll do it again.
Have y'all seen this?
A Freeper in every precinct!
They should have ran into her again. Might have kept that old red pickup truck from cluttering the highways and biways of America. And who knows? It might have kept her from reaching Washington, D.C. But that wouldn't have worked anyway. Clinton knew exactly what he was getting when he appointed her AG. ;>
I bought an armful of the books and passed them out long ago. Got two left, but gonna keep them. One of the few non-fiction books I've ever read straight through without putting it down.
When you steal someone's vote, you are asking for a violent response if it ever became known. That is why vote scam research and reporting is not on the list of priorities with the MSM. After reading Votescam, I understand why it isn't.
Unlikely, Travis. They have had years of practice & have all their techniques down pat. |:^(
I am sure you are right, and Jimmy Carter will be leading the pack next to Jesse Jackson! I hope we are able to get a handle on the voter problem soon. It really makes voting an act of pure faith...faith that is quickly evaporating. We fought for these rights and seeing them cheapened as they have been makes me sick to my stomach.
ping
Has anyone scrutinized the votescam in all the other tossup states that barely went for Goron? In my opinion, the same kind of scam occurred in New Mexico. Their inner city votes didn't "change" the outcome until the next morning.... by a few hundred votes. I think Goron was in on this scam. The other states are Pennsylvania and Michigan. They should have been counted in the Bush aisle.
In addition, LA County & Detroit all had very low % for Bush, i.e., 5-10%. They were lower for the R candidate than they were for Dole in a three way race against Clinton.
The more the DemRATs get away with it, the braver they get to do it on a larger and larger scale. Republicans are stupid and think everyone is honest as they are.
That's why so many little old lady democrats take up knitting...
Too bad the Dan Rathers of the MSM world would rather concentrate on getting Democrats in office than protecting our basic freedoms.
What they don't understand is that they are destroying the country and ultimately themselves in the process.
I saw this day coming ages ago, because we haven't persisted in the prosecution of these felons. I guess everybody wished it would all go away.
I listen to John Fund on the radio often, and enjoy his interviews immensely.
Here's another article on a similar tact. This absolutely must not be allowed. I used electonic voting last year and it has no accountability at all. The sec/state threw the machines out, and this year we're doing OCR with the "Dot System" I used 40 years ago in SRA testing at grade school. Lottsa progres, huh?
Will the 2004 Election be Stolen With Electronic Voting Machines? An Interview with Bev Harris, Who Has Done the Groundbreaking Work on This Issue.
A BUZZFLASH INTERVIEW
BUZZFLASH: Electronic voting machines, including touch-screen voting, have been touted as the salvation of a fair voting process. Your tenacious research over the last year has shown that this idea may be the Trojan Horse of voting machine reform, allowing elections to be stolen more easily than in the past. What are the basic reasons that you argue that electronic voting machines pose a threat to democracy?
BEV HARRIS: Four reasons:
What about motor voter? This is a national law that certain states are using to give illegals driver licenses? Aren't they in the process giving them voting privileges?
Thanks for the ping, Misty!
LOTS of info on this thread to get out to others I know who need to be aware of the Dimz' voter fraud.
May just have to check out John Fund's book to get the bigger picture. Looks to be a winner.
It is only going to get worse because next they will allow online voting with absolutely no accountability!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.