Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy:Undesirable/General Discharges for Civilian Misconduct While on Inactive Duty Reserve Status
SECNAVINST 5420.174C ^ | 17 Oct 2004 | Original Freeper Research

Posted on 10/17/2004 11:26:05 AM PDT by Polybius

Until now, it has been the conventional wisdom of former military Freepers, including myself, that any misconduct committed by John Kerry while a civilian in an inactive duty status while still a member of the U.S. Naval Reserves would have had no impact on his discharge status.

I, along with others, believed that, after release from active duty but while still a member of the Naval Reserve, Kerry could only have been held accountable for misconduct while on active duty for training or for previous misconduct committed prior to his release from active duty.

Well, we have all been proven wrong.

On 4 September 2004, I wrote and posted an essay documenting how the John Kerry Official web page had succeeded in deceiving the news media into believing that John Kerry had been “honorably discharged prior to joining Vietnam Veterans Against the War”.

Kerry Deceives News Media About His Navy Discharge on JohnKerry.com

The fact of the matter is that John Kerry still had Ready Reserve and Inactive Reserve obligated service after his January 1970 release from active duty date and was not even eligible for discharge until 16 December 1972.

The Honorable Discharge Kerry received, however, was dated 16 February 1978, during the Carter Administration.

Today, I received Post 155 on that thread from Freeper “rolling_stone” which included a link to Secretary of the Navy Instruction SECNAVINST 5420.174C whose subject is: Review at the Level of the Navy Department of Discharges from the Naval Service.

SECNAVINST 5420.174C

Section 9-1 of SECNAVINST 5420.174C has an extremely important piece of information:

**************************************

“d. The following applies to applicants who received less than fully honorable administrative discharges because of their civilian misconduct while in an inactive duty status in a reserve component and who were discharged or had their discharge reviewed on or after April 20, 1971: the NDRB shall either re characterize the discharge to Honorable without any additional proceedings or additional proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with the Court’s Order of December 3, 1981, in Wood v. Secretary of Defense to determine whether proper grounds exist for the issuance of a less than honorable discharge, taking into account that:

(1) An other than honorable (formerly undesirable) discharge for an inactive duty reservist can only be based upon civilian misconduct found to have affected directly the performance of military duties;

(2) A general discharge for an inactive duty reservist can only be based upon civilian misconduct found to have had an adverse impact on the overall effectiveness of the military, including military morale and efficiency.

**************************************

There it is, Freepers and all you lurking bloggers and journalists.

Kerry could have received a general discharge as an inactive duty reservist based upon “civilian misconduct found to have had an adverse impact on the overall effectiveness of the military, including military morale and efficiency.”

Kerry could have received an other than honorable (formerly undesirable) discharge as an inactive duty reservist based upon “civilian misconduct found to have affected directly the performance of military duties;.”

Thank you to “rolling_stone” for finding SECNAVINST 5420.174C.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: discharge; dishonorable; kerrorist; kerry; lurch; subliberal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last
To: Petronski
What SECNAVINST regarding this issue was in effect at the time in question? Was this one in effect then?

We need some Pajama People to dig that up. This, however, was a 1984 SECNAV Instruction which referenced past discharge policies.

And BTW, what IS the time in question? Late seventies? Or am I confused?

The linked SECNAV Instruction specifically mentions those "who were discharged or had their discharge reviewed on or after April 20, 1971".

Kerry was not eligible for discharge until 16 December 1972.

21 posted on 10/17/2004 11:47:53 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: edchambers
"serious questions as to why John Kerry only received an honorable discharge through the act of then President Carter, seven years after his discharge, and had to have all of his military citations reissued, on the same day, when he became a United States Senator in 1985. "

O'Neill's comment after the ABC interview.

22 posted on 10/17/2004 11:48:51 AM PDT by FairOpinion (FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ironclad
Breaking the law, ruining their careers, endangering the future of the armed services in which they serve, and possibly their own lives as well.

Most people would whisper it to their spouse in bed. That person would tell their best friend over a drink at the bar. That person would tell everyone they know, one of whom would tell the DrudgeReport, who would tell the entire planet!

23 posted on 10/17/2004 11:49:13 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
Not gonna happen

I knew that. I was just stirring the pot a little.

24 posted on 10/17/2004 11:50:07 AM PDT by SmithL (Vietnam-era Vet: Still fighting Hillary's half-vast left-wing conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Someone on another thread posted that Kerry was (and this in uninvestigated, and unproven) given the DIS DISCHARGE because he married a vietnamese woman while over there who turned out to be a viet cong spy. Have you heard anything about this? Or is it pure b.s.?

That sounds like an urban legend to me.

However, since Kerry refuses to sign his Form 180, ANYTHING your imagination can come up with is possible. ;-)

25 posted on 10/17/2004 11:50:58 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All

I think that this should be explored and that Kerry should be made to release his records regardless of the election results. If and when Bush wins, it could still be a reason to get him out of the Senate. If Kerry (God forbid) wins, then it would be a definite cause for impeachment I would think, especially the visits to Paris.


26 posted on 10/17/2004 11:53:00 AM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
"And BTW, what IS the time in question? Late seventies? Or am I confused?"

You think YOU'RE confused?? I can't keep track of how many times Kerry received his "honorable" discharge", how many different decades he was awarded the same Silver Star, how many people awarded that particular medal OR which people awarded that particular medal in which decade!

27 posted on 10/17/2004 11:54:30 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

re: SF 180

>> Not gonna happen

> I knew that. I was just stirring the pot a little.

Roger that. The fundamental observation here is that Kerry
refuses to even address, in any material way, the challenges
to his Vietnam mythology and later betrayals.

Why would anyone think he's about to answer honestly,
when he shows zero signs of being willing to answer at all?


28 posted on 10/17/2004 11:54:31 AM PDT by Boundless (Was your voter registration sabotaged? Don't find out Nov. 2. Vote early.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
The link to SECNAVINST 5420.174C opens a document dated 22 August 1984. How would this be relevant to Kerry's 1970 separation, his 1970s reserve status, and his 1978 discharge?

Because this particular SECNAV Instruction dealt with the reviewed of General and Undesirable Discharges issued during the Vietnam era.

QUOTE:

"The following applies to applicants who received less than fully honorable administrative discharges because of their civilian misconduct while in an inactive duty status in a reserve component and who were discharged or had their discharge reviewed on or after April 20, 1971"

29 posted on 10/17/2004 11:56:26 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

bttt


30 posted on 10/17/2004 11:56:47 AM PDT by boxerblues (www.ohbluestarmothers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly
I would love Kerry to try and explain this away....

< Indignant Kerry Voice> "ARE YOU QUESTIONING MY PATRIOTISM?!?!?" < /Indignant Kerry Voice>

31 posted on 10/17/2004 11:58:50 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Have you heard anything about this? Or is it pure b.s.?

What was her net worth at the time? If she was a multi-millionaire, maybe its true.

32 posted on 10/17/2004 11:59:23 AM PDT by Go Gordon (Definition of a Yankee: The same as a quickie, only you're by yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Polybius; Kelendrios; Skwidd; marineguy; tongue-tied; ActiveDutyUSMC; dakine; bkwells; chookter; ...
Important Note from 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

The following "post" has been put on 2 different servers.
As new data is added between now, and Nov 2, it will be updated on the servers.
That way you can just copy and paste the url(s) to your contacts.

http://tonkin.spymac.net/hanoikerry1.html

There is a backup site
if the 1st url is unavailable.

http://stophanoikerry.150m.com/




Click Here for
the Stolen Honor documentary that Kerry
and the Democrats do not want YOU to see.


Click Here for
List of Sinclair Stations Natiomwide


Click Here for
The Final 2 Swift Boat Vets Ads!
And All of the rest!


CLICK HERE for Video
NY Times and the Old Media
Wrong about WW II, Wrong about Iraq
In fact Wrong about every USA War!


CLICK HERE
NRA Endorses President Bush


National Rifle Association Oct 2004:

John Kerry Wants to Ban Guns in America!

"John Kerry`s two-decade long U.S. Senate record of opposing Second Amendment rights
makes him the most anti-gun presidential nominee in history! Click Here for the proof!"


That Dog Don`t Hunt



Fraternal Order of Police : Kerry, Stop Misrepresenting Our Support!

"...F.O.P. members as a whole decided that the Fraternal Order of Police would endorse the reelection of President George W. Bush. They based their decision, he said, on the record of the Bush Administration in supporting America's first responders-including helping to secure passage earlier this year of H.R. 218, the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, the organization's top legislative priority. Bush also successfully fought to greatly enhance the benefits for the families of
officers killed in the line of duty..."


Service Men and Women Upbeat on Bush,
War In Iraq, Economy
and Intend To Vote,
Annenberg Data Show
Sixty-nine percent had a favorable opinion of Bush


Multi-National Force - Iraq and Multi-National Corps - Iraq
Click Here for THE REAL TRUTH
Not Kerry and Edwards Fonda and Democrats SPIN


THE story of the 2004 election that no TV or Cable newsroom wants America to know.
Note : IF it was on 60 Minutes 1st, they would tell you.


Click Here for NY Sun 10/13/04
Mystery Surrounds Kerry's Navy Discharge


http://www.nysun.com/article/3107

A Kerry campaign spokesman, David Wade, was asked whether Mr. Kerry
had ever been a victim of an attempt to deny him an honorable discharge.
There has been no response to that inquiry.


Click Here for Wall Street Journal 10/13/04
Op Ed on Kerry's Mystery Navy Discharge


HANOI KERRY
CLICK HERE TO SIGN FORM 180

BUSH DID

WHAT ARE YOU HIDING?
WHAT IS YOUR SECRET?
WHAT DON'T YOU WANT
AMERICA AND THE PRESS TO KNOW?


Hanoi Kerry : Help is on the way!
Hanoi Jane Partners with MoveOn.Org
Click Here



Hanoi Kerry's "Bad Rap"
Click Here for
Hanoi Kerry and Hanoi Jane "movie". LOL


"First I picked Edwards BUT now I pick Hanoi Jane!"

Edwards played football in 1971 when he turned 18
instead of serving in Vietnam.
Hanoi Jane at least was a Viet Cong!
Just like me!

Hanoi Jane and I know how to demoralize US Troops serving today!

We hate US Troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

We hate all US Troops!

We lie about them in 2004 the same as we did in the 60's and 70's!

We vow to insult and undermine Iraq Prime Minister Ayad Allawi

We vow to protect the UN and the Oil for Food Scandal

We vow to keep secret the ties between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaida

We vow to free Saddam Hussein with help from our old friend Ramsey Clark.


John F. Kerry
Timeline of a traitor.
Click Here


Free online version of
Kerry's "The New Soldier"
You can read it online right now.



33 posted on 10/17/2004 12:00:02 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (GET OUT THE VOTE NOV 2 ! IF YOUR NEIGHBORS OR RELATIVES NEED A RIDE TO THE POLLS OFFER TO HELP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

Then why does this Navy document refer to his "Honorable Discharge Certificate" and dated Feb. 16, 1978? It indicates an Honorable discharge although the DD214 hasn't been produced for viewing..... http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/jkmilservice/Honorable_Discharge_From_Reserve.pdf

His other two DD214s dated 15-12-66 and 03-01-70 are available here: http://www.johnkerry.com/pdf/jkmilservice/DD214.pdf


34 posted on 10/17/2004 12:01:45 PM PDT by deport (Texas...... Early Voting in person Oct. 18 thru Oct 29..... vote early and take someone with you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

Does this sum it up?

Kerry: "I received a dishonorable discharge before I received an honorable discharge."


35 posted on 10/17/2004 12:02:21 PM PDT by FulshearTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Well, there was Peanut Jimmie's "Special Discharge Review Program" that he ginned up in 1977 with the intent of upgrading a lot of the discharges his supporters had received that were of a "less than honorable" nature. Certainly, if the suppositions about Mr. sKerry's original discharge are correct, he would have qualified for the review and upgrade.

And it's intersting that the 1978 date of the sKerry discharge as shown on his web site seem to fit in so well with the operative period of that program.

36 posted on 10/17/2004 12:03:46 PM PDT by Mister Sophisticate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: deport
Then why does this Navy document refer to his "Honorable Discharge Certificate" and dated Feb. 16, 1978? It indicates an Honorable discharge although the DD214 hasn't been produced for viewing.....

Doesn't make sense, does it?

Kerry's obligated service would have been completed on 16 December 1972 so why does his Honorable Discharge carry a 1978 date?

Kerry only provides documentation for a 16 FEB 1978 Honorable Discharge.

Why the six year delay?

Most likely, Kerry had a General or Undesirable Discharge that was upgraded to Honorable Discharge in 1978.

Kerry could clear all this up by signing his Form 180.

Instead, Kerry refuses to let America know the truth about his service record.

37 posted on 10/17/2004 12:10:32 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: KMC1; Carl/NewsMax; AnnaZ; Congressman Billybob; diotima
ping
38 posted on 10/17/2004 12:11:33 PM PDT by unspun (RU working your precinct, churchmembers, etc. 4 good votes? | Not "Unspun w/ AnnaZ" but I appreciate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Kerry please sign form 180 ~ you gutless punk ~ Bump!


39 posted on 10/17/2004 12:16:15 PM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

It would explain a lot..Of course he COULD clear this all up...Wonder WHY he doesn't..hmmm


40 posted on 10/17/2004 12:18:07 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson