Posted on 01/18/2005 12:33:16 PM PST by snowsislander
WASHINGTON -- Attorney General nominee Alberto Gonzales told the Senate on Tuesday that he supports extending the expired federal assault weapons ban.
Gonzales also said he wants Congress to get rid of a requirement that would eliminate part of the Patriot Act this year, despite complaints that it is too intrusive.
"I believe the USA PATRIOT Act has greatly improved our nation's ability to detect and prevent terrorist attacks," Gonzales told the Senate Judiciary Committee in written answers to questions left over from his confirmation hearing.
Gonzales, who served as President Bush's lawyer during his first term, is expected to be confirmed when the Senate returns after Bush's inauguration on Jan. 20. He would be the nation's first Hispanic attorney general and replace John Ashcroft.
Democrats, including Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., pressed Gonzales for written answers to several of their questions during his daylong confirmation hearing. Those answers were delivered on Tuesday to the committee, which planned a Wednesday meeting to consider nominations.
Congress let the 10-year-old assault weapons ban expire in September. The measure outlawed 19 types of military-style assault weapons, banned certain features on firearms such as bayonet mounts, and limited ammunition magazines to 10 rounds.
Gonzales pointed out that his brother Tony is a SWAT officer in Houston.
"I worry about his safety and the types of weapons he will confront on the street," Gonzales said. "The president has made it clear that he stands ready to sign a reauthorization of the federal assault weapons ban if it is sent to him by Congress. I, of course, support the president on this issue."
Antigun groups criticized Bush during the presidential campaign for failing to press for an extension of the ban.
Gonzales also said he supports the reauthorization of the Patriot Act, the post-Sept. 11 law that expanded the government's surveillance and prosecutorial powers against suspected terrorists, their associates and financiers.
More than a dozen provisions of the law are set to expire by late October 2005 unless renewed by Congress. These include authority for judges to issue search warrants that apply nationwide, authority for FBI and criminal investigators to share information about terrorism cases, and the FBI's power to obtain records in terrorism-related cases from businesses and other entities, including libraries.
"I believe the sunsets that apply to several provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act should be repealed," Gonzales said.
Opponents have called the law intrusive and contend that letting the FBI get library records undermines civil liberties and threatens to let the government snoop into the reading habits of innocent Americans.
Gonzales says people have misunderstood what parts of the Patriot Act does. "I am unaware of abuses under the USA PATRIOT Act," he said. "For this reason, I welcome an honest and real debate."
Gonzales said he is willing to consider tempering that part of the law.
The statute says business and library records must be "sought for" a terrorism investigation. Opponents have claimed that means the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court - the secret court that approves surveillance and wiretaps for espionage and terrorism cases - had no choice about whether to grant the subpoena.
"I would be happy for the statute to be amended to state the investigators may ask the FISA court for an order requesting the production of documents 'relevant to' an ongoing foreign intelligence investigation," Gonzales said.
---
Works for him I guess since he has access to security personel that will be allowed to have said Evil Black Rifles in various capacities...What a Douche-bag...
MD
Disappointing behavior on the part of Mr. Gonzales. Even if it is not sincere, it still gives ammunition to the gungrabbers, and this is unnecessary -- we are winning the debate.
And not a single word in the article from a pro-2nd amendment/pro-liberty point of view. Just liberals versus ultra-liberals.
Checkmate.
Real men don't whine.
This guy is turning out to be a statist bum.
1)Then Gonzales is an idiot, and
2)Bush is a jerk for pushing him.
Gonzales pointed out that his brother Tony is a SWAT officer in Houston. "I worry about his safety and the types of weapons he will confront on the street," Gonzales said.
But he doesn’t worry about the type of weapons that non-agents of the government might face “on the street.”
Let them shoot cakes, I guess.
Which one?
"The president has made it clear that he stands ready to sign a reauthorization of the federal assault weapons ban if it is sent to him by Congress. I, of course, support the president on this issue."
......man, I just don't know any more. This is OUR side, supposedly.
Why is this surprising. Bush is for it. Gonzales works for Bush. I'd be surprised if he said anything else.
Little people? Listen, the little people need to go out and shop and buy lots of stuff, and if they have a problem, call 911. Just go shopping already.
I don't know why anyone would be surprised by it. It's more like rubbernecking.
As far as I could tell, Ashcroft was not a supporter of the AWB.
More of the same.
A pathetic attempt to suck up to the RATs.
......man, I just don't know any more. This is OUR side, supposedly.
11 posted on 01/18/2005 12:43:05 PM PST by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
"As far as I could tell, Ashcroft was not a supporter of the AWB."
I don't remember him speaking on the issue at all. Since he worked for Bush, and Bush was for it, then I'd guess he'd be on Bush's side. I don't know.
I just don't understand why anyone is surprised at this. It's not as though Bush didn't make it clear how he felt.
Looks like Bush is pulling out all the stops because he knows he cannot be realected. So we have his administration pushing Pro-Illegal, Anti-Gun, Anti-Profiling, Pro La Raza types. But not to worry the supposed conservatives will be posting shorly about how even Gonzales's anti-Gun stance really isn't anti-gun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.