Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gonzales backs assault weapons ban
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^ | January 18, 2005 | JESSE J. HOLLAND

Posted on 01/18/2005 12:33:16 PM PST by snowsislander

WASHINGTON -- Attorney General nominee Alberto Gonzales told the Senate on Tuesday that he supports extending the expired federal assault weapons ban.

Gonzales also said he wants Congress to get rid of a requirement that would eliminate part of the Patriot Act this year, despite complaints that it is too intrusive.

"I believe the USA PATRIOT Act has greatly improved our nation's ability to detect and prevent terrorist attacks," Gonzales told the Senate Judiciary Committee in written answers to questions left over from his confirmation hearing.

Gonzales, who served as President Bush's lawyer during his first term, is expected to be confirmed when the Senate returns after Bush's inauguration on Jan. 20. He would be the nation's first Hispanic attorney general and replace John Ashcroft.

Democrats, including Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., pressed Gonzales for written answers to several of their questions during his daylong confirmation hearing. Those answers were delivered on Tuesday to the committee, which planned a Wednesday meeting to consider nominations.

Congress let the 10-year-old assault weapons ban expire in September. The measure outlawed 19 types of military-style assault weapons, banned certain features on firearms such as bayonet mounts, and limited ammunition magazines to 10 rounds.

Gonzales pointed out that his brother Tony is a SWAT officer in Houston.

"I worry about his safety and the types of weapons he will confront on the street," Gonzales said. "The president has made it clear that he stands ready to sign a reauthorization of the federal assault weapons ban if it is sent to him by Congress. I, of course, support the president on this issue."

Antigun groups criticized Bush during the presidential campaign for failing to press for an extension of the ban.

Gonzales also said he supports the reauthorization of the Patriot Act, the post-Sept. 11 law that expanded the government's surveillance and prosecutorial powers against suspected terrorists, their associates and financiers.

More than a dozen provisions of the law are set to expire by late October 2005 unless renewed by Congress. These include authority for judges to issue search warrants that apply nationwide, authority for FBI and criminal investigators to share information about terrorism cases, and the FBI's power to obtain records in terrorism-related cases from businesses and other entities, including libraries.

"I believe the sunsets that apply to several provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act should be repealed," Gonzales said.

Opponents have called the law intrusive and contend that letting the FBI get library records undermines civil liberties and threatens to let the government snoop into the reading habits of innocent Americans.

Gonzales says people have misunderstood what parts of the Patriot Act does. "I am unaware of abuses under the USA PATRIOT Act," he said. "For this reason, I welcome an honest and real debate."

Gonzales said he is willing to consider tempering that part of the law.

The statute says business and library records must be "sought for" a terrorism investigation. Opponents have claimed that means the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court - the secret court that approves surveillance and wiretaps for espionage and terrorism cases - had no choice about whether to grant the subpoena.

"I would be happy for the statute to be amended to state the investigators may ask the FISA court for an order requesting the production of documents 'relevant to' an ongoing foreign intelligence investigation," Gonzales said.

---


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: attorneygeneral; awb; bang; banglist; bangs; gonzales; gungrabbers; larazagonzales
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-225 next last
To: MileHi
Broken friggin record. You were still wrong, I pointed it out. Deal with it.

You have one of those "Born to Lose" tatoos on your Johnson, right?

101 posted on 01/18/2005 2:05:53 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Sender

>>If Gonzales sells us out and pushes to reauthorize the AW ban, then I will not support anything he does. F him.<<

Have you called your Rep and said Vote NO?


102 posted on 01/18/2005 2:06:02 PM PST by B4Ranch (Don't remain seated until this ride comes to a full and complete stop! We're going the wrong way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner; Squantos; thackney; Flyer

Anybody who supports, or states for whatever reason that they support the AWB is simply and clearly stating that they are absolute idiots.


103 posted on 01/18/2005 2:06:39 PM PST by Eaker ("I am a Scientist ............... and that was fast for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

An AWB is not winning in my opinion. The 100 people serving in The U.S. Senate are the coniving oppurtunists who will do anything they can to maintain their power. An AWB is a good start for them. There are enough John McCain's in the Republican Party to give the AWB a good chance of passing. If they pass this then the Republicans will not be getting any more default votes from me.


104 posted on 01/18/2005 2:08:15 PM PST by Johnnyboy2000 (Give it all up tommorrow to live in world without crime, and go back tothe circuit riding motocross)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

And Kerry was supposed to be worse? How?


105 posted on 01/18/2005 2:09:04 PM PST by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

"Yes, winning with your mouth shut is losing and losing with your mouth fully engaged is winning in some people's surreal world, we have established that."

Bartletts's is on the phone. They want to use your assinine quote in their book.


106 posted on 01/18/2005 2:09:53 PM PST by Johnnyboy2000 (Give it all up tommorrow to live in world without crime, and go back tothe circuit riding motocross)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
"The president has made it clear that he stands ready to sign a reauthorization of the federal assault weapons ban if it is sent to him by Congress. I, of course, support the president on this issue."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Checkmate.

****************

Excellent catch.

107 posted on 01/18/2005 2:10:00 PM PST by trisham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

So Gonzales is a La Raza supporter as well as a gun grabber. Figures.


108 posted on 01/18/2005 2:11:04 PM PST by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tauzero

Left-wacko Molly Ivins grudgingly approves of the way Bush moderated the Texas courts. The Texas trial lawyers' association similarly approved.



Really...... where did you get that info.... got any links to their approval statements, support of the Governor or his picks, donations to his campaigns, etc?


109 posted on 01/18/2005 2:11:22 PM PST by deport (Law of Probability Dispersal: Whatever it is that hits the fan will not be evenly distributed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"...we have established that."

YOU, have repeatedly asserted 'that', but have proven and established nothing.

What have we won by laying down and rolling over?

When in history has ANYONE won their rights by silence? Rights must be defended vigorously and regained, in most cases, by violence.

Your suggestion of silence will result in eventual violence.

110 posted on 01/18/2005 2:12:09 PM PST by Badray (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown. RIP harpseal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

This is a big step down from Ashcroft.

Of course...the 'devil in the details' is how you define "assault weapons". Does Gonzales also believe in limiting how many bullets your Glock can fire without reloading?


111 posted on 01/18/2005 2:12:56 PM PST by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox; Lazamataz

To: Lazamataz
And Kerry was supposed to be worse? How?

29 posted on 01/18/2005 12:56:36 PM PST by B4Ranch


112 posted on 01/18/2005 2:15:06 PM PST by B4Ranch (Don't remain seated until this ride comes to a full and complete stop! We're going the wrong way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Able. But it does not help us for the AG to state publicly that law enforcement is in danger from 'assault weapons'.


113 posted on 01/18/2005 2:16:19 PM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

I will definitely start calling and writing lots of people if there is even a proposal to revive the dead AWB.


114 posted on 01/18/2005 2:18:32 PM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The reactionaries relish in their mindset, nevermind the fact that it makes them look like complete fools.

There's no reasoning with them.


115 posted on 01/18/2005 2:19:05 PM PST by rdb3 (The wife asked how I slept last night. I said, "How do I know? I was sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: trisham
Excellent catch.


Well, it was rather obvious, was it not? It's spelled out in plain English.


Real men don't whine.

116 posted on 01/18/2005 2:20:30 PM PST by rdb3 (The wife asked how I slept last night. I said, "How do I know? I was sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: looscnnn
Tom can't do didily if Bush uses an Executive Order to enact a new AWB.

Bush can't do that. Nice red herring.

117 posted on 01/18/2005 2:21:37 PM PST by sinkspur ("How dare you presume to tell God what He cannot do" God Himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

It's official, Gonzales is off the Supreme Court wannabe list.


118 posted on 01/18/2005 2:22:44 PM PST by hattend (Liberals! Beware the Perfect Rovian Storm [All Hail, Chimpus Khan!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Well, it was rather obvious, was it not? It's spelled out in plain English.

***************

Yes and no. It escaped me, but I was in a bit of a panic when I first read the article. Logic and panic are a bit like vinegar and water.

119 posted on 01/18/2005 2:23:56 PM PST by trisham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Badray; E. Pluribus Unum; Eaker
>>What have we won by laying down and rolling over? <<

Most men and nations die, lying down.

(Are we going to wait for the coffin lid to be nailed down?)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1322851/posts?page=16#16

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1322851/posts?page=84#84

120 posted on 01/18/2005 2:24:24 PM PST by B4Ranch (Don't remain seated until this ride comes to a full and complete stop! We're going the wrong way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson