Posted on 07/13/2005 9:07:30 AM PDT by Richard Poe
|
HILLARY'S SECRET WAR The real story behind
Posted: July 13, 2005 1:00 a.m. Eastern
If that sounds too fantastic to be true, read on.
By Richard Poe
"When Clinton lied, nobody died," says a popular bumper sticker.
While untrue, the slogan makes good propaganda. Democrats can repeat it ad infinitum without fear of rebuttal from Republicans. No conservative in public life is willing to broach the topic of the Clinton body count in 2005. Yet the Clintons are more vulnerable on this issue than on any other.
Nixon's articles of impeachment did not accuse him of ordering the burglary of Democratic Party headquarters at the Watergate Hotel. They accused him only of covering up the burglary, after the fact.
Likewise, no one can prove that Deputy White House Counsel Vincent Foster met his death through foul play. It is quite possible that he committed suicide. However, it has been proved beyond doubt that the Clinton White House obstructed, corrupted and undermined every effort to investigate Foster's death.
Nixon was held accountable for his obstructive acts. The Clintons were not.
A nation in denial
British journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard is one of the most knowledgeable investigators of the Foster cover-up. The Cambridge-educated Evans-Pritchard is less easily dismissed than many Clinton critics. He covered war-torn Central America for the Economist and the Sunday Telegraph. As the Telegraph's Washington bureau chief from 1992 to 1997, he "was known in Washington for accuracy, industry and courage" in the words of Washington Post pundit Robert Novak.
Evans-Pritchard has commented on the cocoon of denial into which many decent, well-meaning people retreat when their governments go bad. He has seen it in many countries. "You tell the people in San Salvador that their air force is carpet-bombing the campesinos, they say that's impossible," he remarked to New York Times Magazine writer Philip Weiss. Evans-Pritchard saw a similar self-delusion proliferating in Clinton's America.
According to Evans-Pritchard, he became "radicalized" in Nicaragua. "I could see that what the [foreign] press was writing was not true about the Sandinistas," he told Insight magazine in 1997. "They had a love affair with the revolution. They were all sitting around Managua and going to parties with Sandinista officials. There was a very romantic side to it all. But out there in the countryside, the Sandinistas were doing horrible things to the campesinos ... people were being killed in quite large numbers."
Evans-Pritchard did what his colleagues would not. He traveled the countryside and interviewed campesinos. They were only too glad to tell him about Sandinista atrocities. "For the first time in my life, I realized that what you read in the papers is not true, and this quite shocked me. I started writing from a different point of view, and I found myself very quickly in a big dispute with my colleagues, and it never ended."
In Clinton's America, Evans-Pritchard saw journalists behaving little differently from their colleagues in the Managua press corps. "The way [American reporters] cover Arkansas is exactly the way they covered Nicaragua, which is they didn't go out into the hills and talk to ordinary people," he noted in 1997.
Evans-Pritchard undertook the task himself. He presented his discoveries in a 1997 book titled, "The Secret Life of Bill Clinton: The Unreported Stories" in my view, the most accurate, thorough and fearless account of Clinton corruption yet produced. It offers a detailed expose of the Clintons' ties to drug lords and death squads, in an America rapidly descending into Salvadoran-style lawlessness.
"To a foreign eye, America looks like a country that is flying out of control," writes Evans-Pritchard.
Regarding Vincent Foster's peculiar death and the ensuing cover-up, Evans-Pritchard wrote in 1997, "The Foster case is taboo for American journalists. In private, many concede that the official story is unbelievable, but they will not broach it in print ... It has nothing to do with party affiliation. If anything, Republican journalists are even more susceptible to the spell."
'Cleaning house'
Jerry Luther Parks was reportedly watching a news bulletin on the death of Vincent Foster when he turned from the television and muttered, "I'm a dead man." His son Gary was with him in the room. It was July 21, 1993. The White House Deputy Counsel had just been found dead in Fort Marcy Park, about seven miles from the White House, across the Potomac River in Virginia. Foster had been shot through the head, said the bulletin, an apparent suicide.
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard interviewed the Parks family extensively. In "The Secret Life of Bill Clinton," he reports that Parks was a nervous wreck for the next two months. He packed a gun and drove evasively to shake off any possible pursuers. At one point, Parks told his family that Bill Clinton was "cleaning house" and that he was "next on the list." Parks had been security chief for Clinton-Gore campaign headquarters in Little Rock, Ark., in 1992.
On Sept. 23, 1993, as Parks was driving to his suburban Little Rock home along the Chenal Parkway, a white Chevrolet Caprice with two men inside drove alongside and peppered Parks' car with semiautomatic gunfire. Parks's car ground to a halt. A man emerged from the white Chevy, fired two rounds into Parks' chest with a 9-mm pistol, then sped off.
Several witnesses watched the murder. The killers were never found. As with so many other "Arkancides" the name given to the long list of suspicious deaths among Arkansas associates of the Clintons Big Media ignored the event.
One of the last people to see Vincent Foster alive was Linda Tripp, who then worked as a secretary for Foster's boss, White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum. Tripp testified before Kenneth Starr's grand jury on July 28, 1998, that the reason she had leaked Monica Lewinsky's story to Michael Isikoff at Newsweek was that Tripp hoped the spotlight of national publicity might protect her from physical harm.
"I am afraid of this administration," Tripp told the Grand Jury.
"But do you have any examples of violence being done by the administration to people who were a threat to them?" asked a juror.
Tripp named Jerry Parks. "[T]he behavior in the West Wing with senior staff to the president during the time the Jerry Parks [murder report] came over the fax frightened me. He had been killed," said Tripp. The "flurry of activity," the closed-door meetings, and the "hush-hush" atmosphere in the White House all struck her as ominous and frightening.
"Maybe you had to be there," said Tripp.
Some skeptics might discount Tripp's fears as fanciful, even hysterical. But Tripp was no hysteric. On the contrary, she had been trained to deal with stress and intrigue to a greater degree than most. According to the New York Times, Tripp worked for "highly classified Army intelligence and commando units in the 1980s," including as an aide to the top-secret Delta Force. "[I]'ve worked on the covert side of the Department of Defense," Tripp told congressional investigators. In short, Linda Tripp was a spook, a professional denizen of the intelligence underworld. Her observations should not be lightly dismissed.
Richard Poe is the investigative editor of David Horowitz's Center for the Study of Popular Culture, as well as managing editor of Horowitz's group blog Moonbat Central. The views expressed in Poe's book, "Hillary's Secret War," are the author's own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center for the Study of Popular Culture.
|
PART 1: Hillary's Plan to Silence Internet Journalists (from HILLARY'S SECRET WAR)
WorldNetDaily 07.06.05
PART 2: How Clintons Took Control of Federal Law Enforcement (from HILLARY'S SECRET WAR)
WorldNetDaily 07.07.05
PART 3: Vast Rightwing Conspiracy Exposed! (from HILLARY'S SECRET WAR)
WorldNetDaily 07.08.05
PART 4: The Shadow Team (from HILLARY'S SECRET WAR)
WorldNetDaily 07.12.05
BTTT - I gotta get me one of these books.
Likewise, no one can prove that Deputy White House Counsel Vincent Foster met his death through foul play. It is quite possible that he committed suicide. However, it has been proved beyond doubt that the Clinton White House obstructed, corrupted and undermined every effort to investigate Foster's death.
I fail to understand how a judge can rule that the stolen Pamela Anderson-Tommy Lee sex video is "newsworthy" and thus they are afforded no privacy and the tape's release (by a network of thieves and their business partners) is legal (with no monetary compensation) yet the Vince Foster photos (of a government employee found dead in a public park) are shielded from the public.
ping
Thanks for the ping. Powerful stuff on the woman who must be stopped.
If the Hildebeast becomes president, NO ONE will be safe. She will be so bad that people will beg for the arrival of the anti-christ.
Richard - this appears to be a much needed follow on to the late Barbara Olson's two books on the most dangerous politician ever to come onto the scene. It's truly a nightmare - an ALG, CISPES, Saul Alinsky mentored radical who has managed to groom herself to join the *apparent* mainstream and gain access to the levers of power. How I wish that those who have the applicable jurisdiction would investigate this criminal, plotting revolutionary before its too late. Do we need another HUAC?
Bump!
bump
I`d think it accurate that the Clinton`s are responsible for the malitia movement prouting up.If a demoncrat wins power,they`ll re-organize once more.
BODY COUNT :
http://www.lizmichael.com/clintond.htm
http://etherzone.com/body.html
http://www.zpub.com/un/un-bc-body.html
Wouldn't that be almost redundant?....:)
>She will be so bad that people will beg for the arrival of the anti-christ.<
One and the same, my man, one and the same....
doesn`t the whore of babylon ride the beast ! ?
You're a few seconds too late.
[and get outta my head!]...;))
Thanks for the ping!
The republicans go along with the dems because they have a bigger plan for us. Can't make waves.
http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html
"Evans-Pritchard has commented on the cocoon of denial into which many decent, well-meaning people retreat when their governments go bad. He has seen it in many countries."
Consider the possibility that your lack of understanding is simply being inside a cocoon, and that even the Supreme Court has gone bad . . .
Let no one forget that this forum was built on revealing the criminality of the Clinton crowd, led by as much as anyone Hillary herself. Keep posting the truth!
|
|
Maybe shes here already... (no heresy intended if one is convinced in the beasts being a male) |
bump
ping for later
Bring back Michael Rivero & Uncle Bill!
Ummm, OK. I'm a newcomer to FR, but not a newcomer to conservatism. I've never heard anybody - meaning public figures or Republicans I know- claim the Clintons had anything to do with murder! This is the first time I've ever heard such claims, so forgive my skepticism. The replies to this thread sound like something one would find over at the loony DU - just with the names of Presidents switched around.
Because of the nature of the alleged offenses, both the Willey case and the Broaddrick case were important -- if the charges could be proven -- in establishing a pattern of obstruction, perjury, and witness tampering. In the Willey case in particular, the President had given a deposition in which he emphatically denied the allegations. Julie Steele, a former friend of Willey's, had testified against her, saying that Willey had encouraged her to lie.
To avoid the media, Al Tracy, Nancy Ruggero, and I met with Willey and her lawyer, Daniel Gecker, at a restaurant in Fredericksburg, Virginia, midway between Washington and Willey's home in Richmond.
The story Willey told us is one I came to believe. If we had been able to call live witnesses in the Senate trial, I would have called her to the stand.
We first met Clinton at the Richmond airport during the 1992 campaign. He gave a short speech and shook hands. He also gave Willey a hug. A friend had this captured on videotape. A short time later Clinton had his aide Nancy Hernreich get Willey's telephone number.
Later that afternoon, Willey was surprised to receive a telephone call from Clinton. He told her he would be in Williamsburg, Virginia, for the evening, without his wife, and that he could get rid of his Secret Service detail. Willey didn't respond. At about 6 PM Clinton called again with the same offer. Willey refused to meet him.
Two days later Willey and her mother attended a large rally on the grounds of the Virginia State Capitol in Richmond. Clinton was present, so Willey approached him and introduced her mother. Clinton talked to her mother will caressing Willey's neck and hair.
On Election Night, 1992, Willey, her husband, her two children, and a friend attended a victory celebration in Little Rock, where she met the President-elect and congratulated him.
About a week later, Clinton called her at home. He was attending a party in Washington and wondered, "Do you think you could come up here and see me?"
"Like how?"
"I mean could you come up and spend some time with me."
Willey told him she was not sure, and he dropped the subject. Later, he worked as a volunteer on several inaugural events, in the White House Correspondence Office, and in the White House Social Office.
After her husband's death, she obtained a part-time job working for White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum.
~snip~ Discovering that her husband -- who was slipping into depression -- had put the family into deep financial straits, Willey desperately sought a better paying job. She asked for an appointment to see the President. On November 28, 1993, the day before she met with Clinton, her husband disappeared. She didn't yet know that he had committed suicide.
Kathleen Willey told us -- in detail -- everything that happened from the moment she met Clinton in the Oval Office until she met Linda Tripp and other White House staffers immediately after the encounter. There is no need at this point, when they are so well known, to go over the sordid details again.
Shortly after Willey went public, The White House -- in an action one federal judge ruled was illegal -- released several letters she had written to the President. The letters evinced no animosity. To the contrary, Willey seemed interested in supporting the President, and some of the letters were written after her encounter with the President in the Oval Office. The White House said the letters proved Willey was lying about the groping incident. Releasing the letters may have violated the Privacy Act and could have been an abuse of the Presidency. But before I could call Kathleen Willey as a witness in an impeachment inquiry or trial, I needed an explanation.
Willey told us that it wasn't until after her husband committed suicide that she learned how dire her financial straits were. She was an unemployed widow, deeply in debt, with two children.
The last time Kathleen had met with the President, she had stalked away angrily after having been groped by him. But in her desperation, she saw the President as the one powerful person who could quickly set her up in a well-paying job. Perhaps, she thought, if I write conciliatory letters to Clinton, giving the impression that all is forgiven and that I hold no grudge, I could reopen the dialogue, and he will help me find a good job. Willey had no intention of ever going public with the President's misbehavior.
Willey discussed what to do with her lawyer and friend Daniel Gecker. He knew about the groping incident and warned her that anything she wrote would need to be completely innocuous, without the remotest suggestion of a backmail, extortion, or veiled threat or suggestion that she wanted a job in exchange for keeping quiet. Kathleen understood. To ensure that nothing she wrote could be misconstrued as a threat, Willey had Gecker review and approve the letters.
In 1994 Kathleen was invited to attend a World Summit in Copenhagen, and in 1995 she represented the United States at a biodiversity summit in Jakarta, Indonesia. She was totally unqualified for either position.
But bad things happened after Willey was subpoeaned to give a deposition in the Paula Jones case. This story was even more shocking than the President's alleged assault on a married woman.
On July 31, 1997, Gecker received, without warning, a fax from the office of the President's attorney. Both Willey and her attorney, who was present during our interview, confirmed to us that it was a document entitled "Statement of Kathleen Willey" and that it came with the instruction that she was to read it as a public statement. It said: "The President of the United States never sexually harassed me in any way, and I have always considered myself to be on excellent terms with him." She ignored the request.
In August 1997 the groping incident was reported in the Drudge Report and Newsweek. Around this time she received a phone call from an acquaintance who was a major financial donor to President Clinton. He told her to avoid giving a deposition if she was subpoenaed in the Jones case and to deny that anything had ever happened because only two people knew and "all you have to do is deny it, too."
Willey was subpoenaed in the fall of 1997 but wasn't actually called to testify until January 10, 1998. Shortly after she received the subpoena, Gecker was visited by one of the President's lawyers. Gecker told Kathleen the gist of the meeting: Clinton's lawyer was suggesting she avoid testifying by taking he Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Gecker told Clinton's attorney that his client wouldn't take the Fifth because she had done nothing wrong.
A short time after that initial meeting, Gecker told us, he received an unsolicited package from the President's lawyers. It contained a form affidavit, a form motion to quash the deposition subpoena, and a memorandum of law in support of the motion to quash.
A short while before Willey was scheduled to testify, Gecker received another visit from the same lawyer. This time Gecker was told that he was only "a real estate lawyer" and that Kathleen Willey should really be represented by a top criminal attorney. Gecker responded that he was perfectly capable of handling a deposition and that he could not see any possible reason that Kathleen needed a criminal lawyer. Gecker added that even if she wanted such a lawyer, Willey was broke and could not afford the fees charged by top Washington criminal lawyers. The President's attorney offered that she wouldn't need to worry about fees because "we will take care of that."
After that conversation, Gecker reported, he received a call from one of the best criminal lawyers in Washington about representing Kathleen Willey. When Gecker again mentioned that she had no money, the lawyer replied that there would be no fees to pay.
Gecker conveyed this to Willey. She was frightened and convinced that if she testified she would be indicted by Janet Reno's Justice Department. She had seen how Billy Dale of the White House Travel Office had actually been indicted and tried for crimes he had not committed, reportedly because he had gotten in the way of the Clinton administration. She had seen the smears and attacks on Paula Jones. To add to her fears, she felt intimidated by events that followed.
Shortly before her January 10 deposition, Willey came out of her Virginia home to find all of her tires flat. Her mechanic asked, "Who the hell did you tick off? Your tires were flattened with a nail gun."
In another incident, a man called -- supposedly from the local electric company -- saying her electricity would be turned off that evening so they could run some tests. Later that afternoon, she called the electric company to find out how long the tests would last. She was told there was no plan to interrupt service and no record of anyone calling her.
Kathleen lives in a semirural area. The anonymous caller was reminding her that she was vulnerable and alone.
As the deposition got closer, the intimidation increased. One day her cat, Bullseye, disappeared. On January 8, two days before she was to testify, Willey was walking her dogs in a secluded area early in the morning. A man in a jogging suit approached her. JOGGER: Good morning, did you ever find your cat?
WILLEY: No, we haven't found her yet.
JOGGER: That's too bad. Bullseye was his name, wasn't it? [This shocks Willey, because she has not revealed the cat's name to anyone.]
JOGGER: Did you ever get those tires fixed?
WILLEY: They're fine [Kathleen starts to edge away and look around for help.]
JOGGER: So,---and---[Willey's children's first names]? [Kathleen walks faster toward her house.]
JOGGER: And our attorney, Dan, is he okay?
WILLEY: He's fine
JOGGER: I hope you're getting the message.
Willey was terrified. She turned and ran. The jogger called after her, "You're just not getting the message, are you?"
As a result of that meeting, Kathleen feared that she, her children, and her lawyer were at risk of physical harm. She told Gecker about the jogger but didn't mention the not-too-veiled threat against Gecker himself. As she put it, "He was my only hope--I didn't want to lose him." Willey confessed that even during the deposition she was contemplating whether to lie or to tell the truth and possibly suffer terrible consequences.
The deposition began as scheduled. However, before the questioning began, the President's lawyer said, "You know, I've talked to the President, and he just thinks the world of you. You don't really think this was sexual harassment. It wasn't unwelcome, was it."
"Not only was it unwelcome, it was unexpected."
In the room during the deposition were the court reporter, the Jones attorneys, the President's attorney, Daniel Gecker, Kathleen Willey, and the presiding judge.
Gecker saw that Willey was nervous. When the Jones attorneys asked about the incident in the Oval Office, she looked terrified. Gecker asked for a short recess to consult with his client. He took Kathleen aside and told her they were about to go into the heart of the subject.
"Kathleen, there is no turning back, what are you going to do."
"I'm going to tell the truth, the whole truth," she answered, with tears in her eyes. She went back and answered every question put to her.
The next morning, Willey stepped outside to pick up the newspaper. There on the porch, within a few feet of the front door, the skull of a small animal lay facing her.
I asked Willey if she would be willing to testify. As she looked at Gecker, I could see real fear in her eyes. He said it was up to her.
I confessed that we couldn't vouch for the tactics of the President's lawyers, but we would not embarrass her.
Okay, if I'm subpoenaed, I'll testify."
Because of that meeting, we planned to have Kathleen Willey and Dan Gecker as witnesses at the Senate impeachment trial.
;;
bump
Maybe she is.
http://alamo-girl.com/0463.htm
I treasure my autographed copy of David Schippers' book.
that would make bill the beast then wouldn't it?
Link ping.
The Dummies are unimaginative crazies.
They've simply taken the true accusations against the Klintons and turned them upside down(somewhat)
Although, even though they are American Hating lunatics, not all they say is made up.
The majority of the American Beauracracy is treasonous to the extreme.
The Clinton Impeachment was turned from an investigation of extortion, bribery, treason, and yes, possibly murder (Ron Brown and Vince Foster) and rendered into a scandal over a fat slut.
That's because the government runs on Mutually Assured Destruction.
Here's some bipartisan treason for you.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1441807/posts
I only got through the first couple paragraphs (since I'm familiar with these stories) before I got really pissed off. We have a media in this country that will send reporters to Texas for literally years to try and uncover Bush's Nationa Guard service...yet they won't even seriously consider looking into any of these charge made by multiple people.
My G-D...the media will help perpetuate some of the most outrageous claims and conspiracies made against Bush, yet can't find the time to look into some of the most serious charges ever made against a sitting president. It has become obvious (especially with the recent Rove flap) that while the Democrats are devious....the media is dangerous. The Democrats could never attain the power they have if not for their willing accomplises in the media.
It's time to stick the final nail in the coffin of the liberal media...and this Rove fiasco could help do just that. While their bias is obvious, it's time to make clear that the media has become the press secretary for the Democrat party. Their role in the Rove Affair must be exposed, not just as interested parties...but as conspirators in an attempted coup.
Just like with Rather and CBS, it must be made clear that the media has taken an active role in what looks like another deliberate setup. From their self-righteous outrage over the "16 Words" in Bush's SOTU (which has been shown to be true by a Senate investigation), to their failure to report the whole story...like the revelation that Joe Wilson was found to be the liar. The MSM are no longer journalists...they are activists in pursuit of their own agenda. This isn't a Free Press; it's a bought and paid for institution that must be exposed for all to see.
I bought that book... A definite must read.. If you can find it.. Probably most will keep that book for reference.. Well done and very readable.. "Unlimited Access- Gary Aldrich" is a great addendum.. The Clintons are not politicians BUT a social disease.. And to think they are not alone..
The Vince Foster affair had and HAS a terrible message..
"We can murder the Asst. Attorney General of the United States right in your face and nobody can or WILL do anything about it.."
WHO DO YOU THINK, YOU ARE.?..
And Bush is a "Unite'er not a Divide'er".. since he failed to fire Clinton appointees on the spot after being elected, and they are STILL are in PLACE too, most of them.. Evidently the message was not LOST on Dubya.. He unites with democrats ever chance he gets.. Wouldn't want to piss off the Dixie Mafia.. assuming Bush don't work for them in the first place.. No WONDER Sandy Burgular is being wrist slapped.. And massive election fraud is ignored..
If you think things will change there by mere VOTING..
Then your denial has pretty much hardened.. into gross denial..
We don't have a fed. gov't we have Marionettes as figureheads, proved daily..
Oh! yes I'm pissed, and amazed at the same time..
I'm amazed that the sheeple have not S.T.A.M.P.E.D.E.D...
The wolves are not even disguised anymore..
This history is one of the reasons why I think it an outrage for Billy Graham to place upon his stage at a supposed crusade for Christ these two unrepentant hooligans. I don't care how old Graham is.
Uniter, not a divider alright.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1441807/posts
|
|
The replies to this thread sound like something one would find over at the loony DU Welcome to FR! Not been here too long myself. The number of deaths suffered by people who posed a threat (real or potential) to the Clintons is beyond coincidence. Check out the links in post 10, also here. Do a web search on Fahmy Malak, Arkansas medical examiner. It will not take long for you to realize that this is very far from a FR conspiracy theory. ...but skepticism is healthy. Good on ya! |
I hear ya.
After the Clintoon debacle.. what does..
"I'm a Unite'er and NOT a Divide'er", even mean, anyways.?..
Nevemind... I already know.. and the boy is getting ready(fixin to) totally deface the Supreme Court for decades..
Get ready for the wails of the conservatives and the Curly(Howard) salute of the BushBats..
Clue: John McLaim and the democrats just LOVE Gonzalez..
Thats gotta crawl your nape..
You are either living a very sheltered life or you are actually a DemocRAT spinmeister. You should go to Newsmax.com and start reading some of their articles from the 90's about Vince Foster and Ron Brown. Their articles are well-documented and are not written by crackpots. I'll tell you the day I really started to understand the Clintons--it was the day I heard Rush Limbaugh call Bill Clinton a "sociopath." I had never heard him use that term for anyone (and nobody else since that day). The word sociopath has a very specific meaning in criminal psychology, and the more you dig into this subject the more you'll find that, as George Will wrote, Clinton is the "worst person every to be elected president."
Unfortunately HUAC lacked the power to get to the root of the matter. We probably need something more like a Truth Commission.
Truth Commissions have been used successfully in countries such as Pinochet's Chile, in order to ease the transition from dictatorship to the rule of law. The idea is to fully investigate and publicize the crimes of the outgoing regime, while guaranteeing that no one in that regime will be prosecuted.
The guarantee of immunity to high-level perpetrators is necessary, in order to prevent the perps from shutting down the investigation, throwing the commissioners in jail, and calling out the troops.
The Clintons got away with their crimes, because plenty of high-ranking Republicans were just as dirty as the Clintons, and feared exposure of their own crimes and scandals by the Clinton attack machine.
A Truth Commission would break this stalemate by removing the threat of legal action from both sides. The Commission could then go about its job of ferreting out the truth and publicizing it to the American people.
AEP was right about one thing: memories are short. [I have deep archives on disk about much of this.]
FReegards,
IR
Plenty of high ranking republicans still are.
Me too!
But it's Hill not Bill.
I'm not convinced that she's a she. Besides I just read here on FR about a female who suddenly turned into a male, who's to say the hildabeast won't obtain that person's secret?
She's horrible. I honestly think that living in dhimmitude under the Muslims, absolutely awful as they are, would be preferable to being stomped by the jackboots of a totatiltarian regime run by the Hildebeast.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.