|
HILLARY DUD -- NOT DUFF -- PORTENDS JEANINE WIN
|
Posted on 08/10/2005 6:47:48 AM PDT by Mia T
HILLARY DUD -- NOT DUFF -- PORTENDS JEANINE WIN
As the unquestioned leader in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, and as the holder of a 34 percent advantage in her Senate re-election campaign, she will almost inevitably deploy the strategy of "sitting on a lead." There is probably no more dangerous stratagem in American politics. -- Tony Blankley-'Pirrotechnic' campaign against Hillary
We used to execute rapists and traitors. Today we elect them president? -- Mia T
Of course, her campaign advisers will not call it that -- even to themselves. But it is damnably hard to avoid sitting on a lead when you have a real lead...
The campaign not only loses its own inner spirit and enthusiasm -- but the public begins to see the candidate as uncommitted to anything. It becomes boring and takes on the tone of a corporate press release.... -- Tony Blankley-'Pirrotechnic' campaign against Hillary
Hillary R. Clinton is particularly vulnerable to this process. She is already seen as trying to move to the presumed safe center. If she were a better politician (like her husband), she would do it without being noticed. In her effort to please more and more interests, she will inspire fewer and fewer voters. Playing it cynically safe in her re-election campaign will only increase her vulnerability.
If Ms. Pirro can mount a campaign capable of gaining a reasonable amount of attention acting as an annoying mosquito day after day and month after month, it is likely to bring out the most unappealing imperial manners in Ms. Clinton -- as Queen Hillary ignores or dismisses each of the charges.
As her 63 percent lead dwindles to a still respectable 57 percent or 56 percent or 55 percent next summer, she and her campaign advisers may suddenly feel the need to do something. She may take a liberal stand on a few issues to re-build enthusiasm in her base south of 96 Street. That may well save her re-election bid from embarrassment, but it would undercut her eight-year presidential strategy of pretending to be moderate. -- Tony Blankley-'Pirrotechnic' campaign against Hillary
hear hillary clinton
I could say she has all of bill clinton's baggage and none of his charm, except I don't find bill clinton charming. What she lacks, in my view, is lubricant. Snake oil. She grates.
It's more than simple dislike. You don't want to see her; and you definitely don't want to hear her.
Missus clinton is everyman's worst nightmare: ex-wife, fishwife, frigid wife, mother-in-law; worse, the abusive Nazi commandant in the Lina Wertmuller masterpiece. When she humiliates, which is always, she dons the military-issue undershirt, she grabs the whip.
The clintons are clearly aware of this problem and are attempting to mitigate it with veneer.
Their first ploy is to pushpoll to artificially jack up missus clinton's numbers; this is a relatively easy task, given a compliant press. This illusion of electability is intended to fool the voters, activate the herd mentality and ultimately fool the smart money of the David Geffen-Harold Ickes stripe.
Their second ploy is to conflate "bill" and "hillary." "The clintons" become a single construct. Missus clinton arrogates bill's "bridge to the 21st century " as "theirs." And, by lifting the lyrics straight from Pinocchio, she becomes "the man from 'hope'."
The danger here for missus clinton is that with the bridge and the hope come the abuses and the utter failures.
AFTERWORD:
Who in heaven's name is writing missus clinton's speeches? They make her sound like a cross between Pinocchio on Halcyon and a clueless tourist from Park Ridge, Illinois driving into Manhattan during rush hour. Oops.
And the plagiarizing... I mean, the clintons are shameless. And it isn't only Pinocchio.
In 2002, I wrote that the bridge to the 21st century was, arguably, clinton's most delusional conceit, that it overshot the mark by at least 1400 years.
To be fair, missus clinton's 19th-century reference is to that <yawn> retrograde 'retrograde Republicans' cliché, whereas my 7th-century reference is to the retrograde-in-fact islamofascist terrorists, whose jihadi declarations and acts of war against us the clintons willfully ignored for eight long years--allowing al Qaeda to grow exponentially in strength and reach, setting us up--very nicely, thank you--for 9/11 and its cataclysmic aftermath.
by Mia T, 8.10.05
the danger of the unrelenting smallness of bill + hillary clinton
by Mia T, 7.31.05
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
MAD hillary series #4
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN
FOR AMERICA
FOR THE WORLD
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor
by Mia T, 8.03.05
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
MAD hillary series #5
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN
FOR AMERICA
FOR THE WORLD
address to the Democratic Leadership Council
Columbus, Ohio
7.31.05
issus clinton is a dud.
It won't work. Missus clinton has 100% name recognition. Any vote she doesn't already have, she won't get. Conversely, many voters have 0% information on the clinton abuses of power and utter failures. From this it follows that many votes she has today, she won't have tomorrow.
|
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS FOR THE CHILDREN, FOR AMERICA, FOR THE WORLD madhillary.com (coming soon) madhillary.blogspot.com COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005 |
:^)
;)
Shillary gives me the chills. The good thing is she will give's them to just about everyone . Yaaaack !!!! ;-)
LOL! Done! Welcome aboard Mia T!!!
"'BTW, obviously the best way to beat her in 08 is to beat her in 06!""
I am not so sure about that.
I am begining to think that the GOPS only hope to win in 2008, is against Hillary.
If the DEMS nominate either Mark Warner or worse Phil Bredsen, it will be all over for the GOP nominee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
