Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Told of ATF Seizures, Threats to Gun Buyers
CNSNews.com ^ | February 17, 2006 | Jeff Johnson

Posted on 02/17/2006 11:16:14 AM PST by SonofLiberty1

Congress Told of ATF Seizures, Threats to Gun Buyers By Jeff Johnson CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer February 17, 2006

(CNSNews.com) - Agents of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), allegedly acting without warrants or legislative authority to do so, seized firearms from at least 50 gun show patrons in Virginia according to congressional testimony and an agency document made public Wednesday. Witnesses also testified that African-American and female gun buyers in Richmond, Va., and Pittsburgh, Pa., were profiled based on their race or sex and some in Pittsburgh were threatened with arrest by ATF agents for alleged actions that are not violations of law.

Rep. Howard Coble (R-N.C.) chairs the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security, which has jurisdiction over ATF. While he supports the agency's mission, Coble questions some of its tactics.

"ATF reports that 206 [gun show] participants were stopped and interviewed while it confiscated firearms from another 50 participants," Coble said, referring to gun shows in Richmond, Va. "Although most of the firearms were ultimately returned, the purchasers were notified via official letter from ATF that [they] were ordered to appear at the local ATF office to discuss their transactions. In addition, the letter explained that failure to appear could result in an arrest warrant being issued for the alleged charges."

The form letter had blanks for the name of the gun show patron and the date and time they were ordered to appear at the ATF field office, but cited no authority for the gun confiscations or the mandatory office visits.

"An investigation has revealed that you may have violated Title 18 U.S.C. Section 924(a)(1)(A), a crime punishable by imprisonment for up to five years," the letter began. The U.S. Code citation refers, in this instance, to knowingly making a false statement on the ATF Form 4473 "Firearms Transaction Record Part I - Over-The-Counter," which is completed for each firearm purchased from a federally licensed firearms dealer (FFL).

"The firearm that you purchased is being taken into ATF custody," the letter continued, citing no authority for the seizure.

Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.) said the ATF letter and the reported interrogation of lawful gun buyers raise "serious questions."

"There's a way to have a sting operation that's legal. This dragnet, apparent dragnet, however, is not the way it ought to be done," Scott said. "You have to show probable cause and it can be done. But you ought not just stop people without probable cause and without any indication of guilt."

John White, a former law enforcement officer who is now an FFL operating under the business name "The Gunsmith," said female customers who approached his sales area at the Richmond shows were immediately targeted by the "undercover" officers.

"If a woman showed up at my table, she was surrounded by law enforcement," White recalled. "If the lady walked off and suddenly stopped, they would have bumped into each other. Their surveillance methods were pitiful.

"Every woman that makes a purchase, every woman who comes to my table to buy a gun was automatically [treated as] a straw purchaser," White said. (A "straw purchaser" is a person who can otherwise legally purchase a firearm, but who does so with the intent to illegally provide it to an ineligible buyer such as a convicted felon or an illegal alien. "Straw purchases" are illegal.)

As Cybercast News Service initially reported, ATF agents working with as many as 400 state, county and city police officers near Richmond, Va., conducted so-called "residency checks" on individuals who purchased firearms from the Showmasters Gun Show Aug. 13 and 14, 2005. Uniformed officers went to the homes of prospective gun buyers, while they waited for their National Instant Check System (NICS) background checks to be completed and questioned family members and neighbors about the gun buyers' firearm purchasing habits.

In a subsequent report, Cybercast News Service detailed that ATF had conducted at least seven similar gun show "sting operations" targeting Richmond-area residents since July of 2004. ATF refused to discuss any of the operations with Cybercast News Service and refused to provide any documentation in response to Freedom of Information Act requests filed by the sponsors of the Richmond gun shows.

Suzanne McComas, a licensed private investigator who has worked with the America's Most Wanted television program, was hired by the National Rifle Association (NRA) to gather information about ATF's Richmond operations. During her investigation, she learned that the agency had been conducting "residency checks" in at least one other U.S. city, but using different and "much more intimidating" tactics.

"At Pittsburgh, the Firearms Task Force there that's also headed by the ATF, instead of doing residency checks immediately, they're collecting the 4473 with the purchaser's address on it, then they go knock at the door about a week later and ask, 'Could we see the gun that you bought?'" McComas explained. "There's absolutely no process involved, there's no reason for them to do it. If you cannot produce the gun, they ask you for the sale paperwork. If you refuse to produce the paperwork they put you under arrest for a 'straw purchase.'"

Federal law requires licensed gun dealers to complete an ATF Form 4473 for each firearm sold through their business, in addition to any forms required by the state, county and/or city where they do business. Private sales between individuals, who are not engaged in the firearms trade as a business, are subject to no such federal recordkeeping requirements. Therefore a gun show purchaser could legally sell or even give the gun they purchased to someone else yet have no paperwork to meet the ATF's demand.

"You and I know that, but [a woman who bought a gun and then gave or sold it to someone else, both legally] probably doesn't," McComas told Cybercast News Service. "If she can't produce it, they arrest her for a straw purchase and her life turns into a living hell until she can prove otherwise. It's zero probable cause except for the fact that they thought it was a straw purchase because she was black and she was young and she was female."

McComas questioned not only the legality of the ATF tactics in Pittsburgh, but also the methodology.

"When I asked them what their criteria was for the people that they collected the 4473s on at the Pittsburgh show, the answer I got back was, 'If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's a duck. That's all we need,'" McComas continued. "Translation: Under 30 and black, period. That's all they were looking for. Anyone who meets those criteria, they're doing a follow-up on."

She said that, as in Richmond, agents in Pittsburgh were also engaged in activities that gun dealers believe were designed to discourage lawful purchases by minorities.

"Anyone who was a minority, they picked up their 'tail,' if you will, and just followed them through the gun show. When they stopped at a table, the agents would literally stand on one side or the other and watch what they were doing. If they started to purchase a gun [the agents] would ask them why they were buying it, what were they buying it for, what did they need that gun for," McComas related. "It was ridiculous. There was absolutely no reason for it other than the color of their skin."

Rep. William Delahunt (D-Mass.) said he had not intended to attend the hearing, which was held immediately after a subcommittee vote on an unrelated bill, but stayed because he was fascinated by the witnesses' testimony.

"These must be the dumbest ATF agents in the entire agency," Delahunt said. "I am absolutely shocked that they could be that stupid.

"It's almost to the point that it's difficult to believe," he added. "I have never heard of an experience like the ones you recount, but you all seem to be in agreement. It's just mind-boggling."

Rep. Tom Feeney (R-Fla.) expressed curiosity that federal law enforcement officers would not know that the actions described by White and McComas violate federal statutes.

"Did anybody mention that it is a federal crime to deny women or minorities their civil rights?" Feeney asked. "Did anybody mention to the ATF that denying civil rights, including the right to bear arms, is a federal crime?"

Feeney suggested that, since ATF had refused to comply with the Freedom of Information Act requests from the gun show promoters, the subcommittee should request the information they were seeking. Coble noted that such a letter had already been sent.

ATF representatives present at Wednesday's hearing reluctantly identified themselves by raising their hands when asked to do so by Coble. They would not respond to the new allegations raised in the hearing, but referred questions to their press office. ATF officials are expected to testify on the issues raised Wednesday in a second hearing scheduled for Feb. 28.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; atf; bang; banglist; billofrights; bradywatch; constitutionlist; disbandthem; govwatch; jackbootedthugs; jbt; libertarians; unintendedcnsequncs; virginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-163 next last
To: Joe Brower
When they stopped at a table, the agents would literally stand on one side or the other and watch what they were doing. If they started to purchase a gun [the agents] would ask them why they were buying it, what were they buying it for, what did they need that gun for,"

Just picked this russian 308 up today.
Had they asked me why I was buying it, what I was buying it for, what did I need that gun for, I would have responded:

I dont need it, Im buying it because you guys stopped importation of it and its a good price. The damn thing is here legally, is there a problem?

101 posted on 02/17/2006 3:42:08 PM PST by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
Section 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

This should have been applied to all members of the ATF and FBI immediately following the Waco assault and massacre. Then the FBI should have been radically reorganized -- including removal of the entire top four layers of management. And the ATF should have been permanently disbanded.

102 posted on 02/17/2006 3:48:39 PM PST by TXnMA (TROP: Satan's most successful earthly venture...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

PING me with the results of the Wed. Feb 28th hearing when it's available. I want to know what the ATF's response is.


103 posted on 02/17/2006 4:36:17 PM PST by BlueOneGolf (I Ride and I Vote. Join me in the American Motorcycle Association today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fee

Yep pass a law........ all the rest seem to be working really well......< /sarcasm>


104 posted on 02/17/2006 4:42:58 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

In the three ring circus that is the Federal Bureaucracy, the BATF are the clowns in the little car!


105 posted on 02/17/2006 4:45:49 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

LOL! I agree :)


106 posted on 02/17/2006 5:39:00 PM PST by Paul_Denton (Every single troll is now an enemy of the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Is there a reason they wear skimasks? That used to be the trademark of a robber.

Oh yea, and that is one big MF!


107 posted on 02/17/2006 5:58:41 PM PST by planekT (<- http://www.wadejacoby.com/pedro/ ->)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: mysterio; freepatriot32
But doncha feel nice and safe, though? Remember, all we have to do is get us a Republican majority and all of this intrusive government stuff will stop.

The big LIE, amongst some of the biggest LIE's ever told! Blackbird.

108 posted on 02/17/2006 6:13:53 PM PST by BlackbirdSST (Diapers, like Politicians, need regular changing for the same reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BlackbirdSST
Having the House and Senate in Republican control is better than the alternative, but still a huge disappointment.

The President, on the other hand is not only not for us he is against us, at least that is my feeling. He can't come out and support gun control for political reasons but he has done nothing for us and some things such as this against us.

Never forget what his Father did to us.

109 posted on 02/17/2006 6:19:44 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
"We're from the ATF, and we're here to give you a little lesson in law."

G. Gorden Liddey had a cure for that crap! Blackbird.

110 posted on 02/17/2006 6:23:11 PM PST by BlackbirdSST (Diapers, like Politicians, need regular changing for the same reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: looscnnn

I'm not A T F , butt can I be first in line ?


111 posted on 02/17/2006 6:48:00 PM PST by righthand man (WE'RE SOUTHERN AND PROUD OF IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

#102 - Dead right.


112 posted on 02/17/2006 7:16:00 PM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Fee
If a number of legally brought guns are getting into the hands of street criminals via straw buyers, how does one stop it?

By arresting the crimminals and keeping them in jail instead of letting them out where they can buy guns.

That way you don't have to harrass law abiding citizens.............
113 posted on 02/17/2006 9:21:23 PM PST by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

"Did anybody mention that it is a federal crime to deny women or minorities their civil rights?" Feeney asked. "Did anybody mention to the ATF that denying civil rights, including the right to bear arms, is a federal crime?"



Isn't it a federal crime to deny anyone civil rights? I do believe that cowardly federal agents would single out women and minorities though because they would be more likely to be intimidated by law enforcement for obvious reasons. They would better think twice before they pulled that shit on me.


114 posted on 02/18/2006 1:16:25 AM PST by sangrila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Supernatural

Well the ACLU seems to have that down pat when it comes to liberal causes. Just fight like cornered rats cubed, then ca-ching at the taxpayer's purse and blare it out to every news media known to man.


115 posted on 02/18/2006 1:23:17 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Fee

Dumb answer. The only people breaking the law here seem to be ATF agents. Criminals will be able to get guns regardless of what the ATF or anyone else does. I never seem to hear about the ATF taking weapons from actual criminals. All I ever hear about them is stuff like this, or the mess in Waco, or that they are making life difficult for people who are licensed to sell firearms. The ATF is another one of those unecessary federal agencies that need to be dissolved.


116 posted on 02/18/2006 1:36:19 AM PST by sangrila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sangrila
This is why I do my Gun business in the gun show parking lot or up the road at the Burger King...Remember every time you purchase a weapon from a licensed dealer you are giving up your Constitutional rights.
117 posted on 02/18/2006 2:09:40 AM PST by JABBERBONK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: looscnnn
Where did you get the James Carvile pictures?
118 posted on 02/18/2006 2:47:13 AM PST by Nik Naym (Ted Kennedy's Oldsmobile has killed more people than Dick Cheney's shotgun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

The ACLU is certainly no fan of freedom.


119 posted on 02/18/2006 5:42:51 AM PST by Supernatural (All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
Rep. William Delahunt (D-Mass.) said he had not intended to attend the hearing, which was held immediately after a subcommittee vote on an unrelated bill, but stayed because he was fascinated by the witnesses' testimony. "These must be the dumbest ATF agents in the entire agency," Delahunt said. "I am absolutely shocked that they could be that stupid.

Does this Masshole liberal mean they're so stupid because they got caught, or because of what they did?

What about the supervisors that OK'ed these operations in at least 3 cities? Federal bureaucracy doesn't move unless it has authorization in triplicate from a higher up.

Congress needs to go up the chain of command and fire with prejudice everyone associated with this operation.

120 posted on 02/18/2006 6:50:20 AM PST by metalurgist (Death to the democrats! They're almost the same as communists, they just move a little slower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson