Posted on 06/02/2006 4:46:30 PM PDT by wagglebee
LONDON: It has been 84 years since Egypt's famed Valley of the Kings revealed its last great riches the fabulous gold of Tutankhamen's tomb.
Now archaeologists believe they have stumbled across one final secret: The mummified remains of the boy king's widow buried 3000 years ago.
In a mysterious shaft less than 15m from Tutankhamen's burial ground, US archaeologists found seven coffins.
They believe one they have not yet been able to open may contain the remains of Queen Ankhesenpaaten.
The tomb found by accident by Memphis University team leader Dr Otto Schaden contained seven coffins stacked closely together and ringed by 28 clay jars, each decorated with a beautiful face mask. The coffins were buried about 1320BC.
A child-sized coffin one of five so far raised contained a small gilded ornamental sarcophagus of a quality that was usually buried only with royalty.
Ankhesenpaaten's link to the tomb was further underlined when a coffin seal was found with part of her name on it.
"I think there is a 70 per cent chance that Ankhesenpaaten's mummy is in that last coffin," Egyptian antiquities head Dr Mansour Boraik said.
"If she is, it will be a major find because very little is known about her."
GGG Ping.
Wow!
Pictures? ;)
There weren't any with the article.
Tut may not have known either...
/sarc
Here's a link with a picture and video.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2029521&page=1&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312
Ankhesenamen is not only Tutankhamen's wife but evidence also strongly indicates she was his half-sister as well. The article calls her Ankhesenpaaten but her name was later changed to Ankhesenamen after Egypt shifted back to the old religious practices which are oriented towards the worship of Amen instead of Aten.

I couldnt' get the video to work but I'll be on the lookout for the Discovery Channel documentary airing on Sunday.
Thank you!!
Very exciting find!
Is that how she really looked?
Very beautiful.
No, I don't think that's a real pic of the Egyptian chick. :P
Send Geraldo.
wow! very cool!
Lara Croft, Tomb Raider is on as I read this. One of those funny koinkydinks online.
"Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia, King Tut!"
Seriously, Tutankhamen was always shown as married in funerary depictions. Died at eighteen, poor kid.
The word "sister" as used in ancient amorous poetry did not necessarily imply incest, but simply that another female had replaced one's actual sister as an ideal object of love and devotion. Read the Song of Songs.
"Had a Condo made o' Stona"
/wonder if the impeached ex president clinton has heard this, he had a thing for mummies..
"clinton has heard this, he had a thing for mummies.."
Hah!
bttt
Thanks Waggs. Tut was married to (possibly) a half-sister, and the relationship may have been closer than that. :'o
To the others addressed above, a ping, you can guess why. ;')
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
How did they keep their bloodlines disease free if they mated?
There has been a lot of speculation that she was forced to marry Tut's successor to legitimize his accession to the throne.
It has often been stated in articles that Egyptian pharoahs "married their sisters" but that is a misleading oversimplification. The practice was actually limited to a very specific relationship in which they had the same father but different mothers, i.e. half-sister and half-brother.
There is some interesting discussion of this practice (which was not limited to Egypt but occurred in other ancient middle-eastern dynasties as well) in the works of Zechariah Sitchin. His thesis was that the practice actually strengthened the bloodlines of the royal classes of these kingdoms because of their "unique" geneological heritage. That's a discussion for another time, however. /grin
Another example of this is found in the Old Testament account of Abraham marrying his sister Sarah. The original form of the name Abraham was "Abram", which was Sumerian, and Sarah was "Sarai" which was Sumerian for "princess". Thus Abraham and Sarah were expatriate Sumerian royalty from the city of Ur, who were simply following the traditional practice of their culture.
How did they keep their bloodlines disease free if they mated?
No I don't think that's Tut. See the sun above the figures? That is the pharoah that worshiped the disk of the sun as an image of the one god Aton. So it must be Akhenton and his wife Nefertiri.
No I don't think that's Tut. See the sun above the figures? That is the pharoah that worshiped the disk of the sun as an image of the one god Aton. So it must be Akhenton and his wife Nefertiri.
Who sez they kept them disease free? ;') Akhenaten (Tut's father?) appears to have suffered from Marfan's syndrome, and judging from the Amarna-period art, so did his offspring. His offspring were frail. Also, there were some pharaohs who came from nowhere, and were apparently military leaders, or from the priesthood(s), chosen apparently because the line of pharaohs finally inbred itself out of existence.
Each pharaoh had to come from "the same womb" as his predecessor, which led to incestuous marriages, and there's no way to disguise it. Fathers married daughters, uncles nieces, brothers sisters, and of course, cousins married. Not all of these unions produced offspring, and favorite sons were put on the throne, and married to a princess of the blood just to legitimize the reign -- although I'm not an advocate for the legitimacy of a monarchy.
I was of the impression that the art that shows Tut with the Aten was made before he became pharaoh, maybe even while Akhenaten was still alive. Then the old religion came back into style, and all of the Aten-related objects, like the throne, were kept around because they were too pretty (and too expensive) to throw away. The priests probably came up with some theological explanation to justify it, saying that the Aten had become part of Amen-Ra, or something like that.
More likely that's how Queen Nefertiti looked. Note how she's wearing a red version of the blue crown in the famous bust. I understand that there's a movie about Nefertiti in the works, with Halle Berry playing the lead part.
A case can be made that the XVIII dynasty was one of the least inbred. The pharaohs after Thutmose III were able to marry foreign princesses, a choice that normally was not available to earlier dynasties. And Queen Tiye, the matriarch of the Amarna period, was not of royal ancestry; her father Yuya was a general and a priest of Min. Still, I think the family's genetic good luck ran out with Tut, because both of his children were stillborn. Now I'm hearing speculation that the gold doll-sized coffin from KV63 might have been meant for one of the fetuses. As for why they were buried instead with wooden coffins in Tut's tomb, your guess is as good as mine.
Whatever ailed Ikhnaton, it can't be attributed to royal inbreeding. His mother Tiye was a commoner.
Well, the Ptolemys inbred for generations and the final product - Cleopatra - was apparently not lacking in mnetal or physical attributes.
There's no evidence at all that Amenhotep IV suffered from Marfan' Syndrome, just speculation based on artistic depictions.
Not bad for 3000yrs old.
There is a bust of him in the Cairo museum- showing a very long face, ears, etc...
Ankhesenpaaten is also the daughter of Nefertiti.
If this is really Ankhesenpaaten ,I can't wait to see the complete facial reconstruction of this mummy.
The artistic depictions *is* evidence, but nice try.
Yeah, definitely. There is at least one object in the boy king's tomb which has his old -aten name, and there's the major monument of his reign, the colonnade at Karnak, which was later recarved with Ramses II's cartouche.
Smenkhkhare, the Hittite Pharaoh
BBC History | September 5, 2002 | Dr Marc Gabolde
Posted on 07/30/2004 12:42:36 PM EDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1181802/posts
8 posted on 10/24/2004 12:50:46 AM EDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1181802/posts?page=8#8
Of course . . . She's "well preserved".
I never understood the way inbreeding worked with the Ptolemies. From what I gather the women got smarter as time went on, and they had several names, while every one of the men was named Ptolemy (we use nicknames to tell them apart), and they grew fat and stupid. Ptolemy X, for example, could barely walk.
"The artistic depictions *is* evidence, but nice try."
No it's not. It is [piss-poor] evidence that Amenhotep IV had a long face and big ears nothing more. Mafan's is simply speculation as to the cause of this trait. It also makes the massive assumption that these are accurate, realistic depictions of Amenhotep IV. I also doesn't help that there are many different styles used to depict him.
Perhaps you believe that Marie-Thérèse Walter was blue and had her tits on the side instead of the front based on 'evidence' from Pablo Picasso!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.