Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

08/10/06 FOX News Poll: 2006 Election Anti-Incumbent Fever; Job Ratings (Not Good for Republicans)
Fox News ^ | Thursday, August 10, 2006 | Dana Blanton

Posted on 08/10/2006 7:53:47 PM PDT by UncleJeff

NEW YORK — As the midterm elections approach, voters say they are much more likely to support a challenger over the incumbent candidate, according to a new FOX News Poll. In addition, "throw the bums out" is a popular choice when voters pick bumper sticker wording to describe the main reason for their vote for Congress this year. President Bush’s job rating is unchanged this month holding steady at 36 percent approval...

If the election were held today, 48 percent of Americans say they would vote for the Democratic candidate in their congressional district and 30 percent for the Republican candidate. This 18-percentage point edge is up from an 8-point advantage in mid-July and a 13-point lead in June...

Among those saying Iraq will be very important to their vote, 48 percent say they plan to back the Democratic candidate and 31 percent the Republican candidate in the upcoming election...

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006election; 2006polls; bullzogby; election2006; makingitup; mediabias; polling; polls; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 last
To: Gunslingr3

This has more to do with outside influences and little to do with our efforts. They are killing each other instead of Americans for the most part. This was predicted and expected. I recall pre-war estimates of 10,000 to 20,000 Amercians killed in this conflict.


101 posted on 08/11/2006 4:17:11 AM PDT by CurlyBill (Democratic Party Agenda ------> Emasculate America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

There were two challengers who did not get their names out. Less people voted in the primary on that issue than in others because many just didn't vote. It was like the voters wanted to vote against DeWine but did not know which of the two to vote for.
Today there is no enthusiasm for DeWine in Ohio. You cannot deny that. He is not one of us anymore. He is a Democrat in Republican clothing. Some Republicans may vote for him just to bolster the majority numbers in the Senate - but they are not voting for him. They will be voting for the "R" following his name. He is a RINO and undeserving of anything support. A man told me the other day it was worth having a Democrat senator for 6 years just to flush DeWine out of the system. The RINO is NOT Ohio's state mascot. That is why the Ohio Senate seat is in danger of being lost.


102 posted on 08/11/2006 6:19:50 AM PDT by Martins kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb; Torie

These were all the House generic ballot polls from the July and August of 2002. The portrait was quite clearly far different than this year's polling, Gallup notwithstanding.

ABC News 07/02: 46% GOP to 47% DEM

CNN/USA Today/Gallup 08/19-21/02: 42% GOP to 50% DEM
CNN/USA Today/Gallup 07/26-28/02: 42% GOP to 48% DEM

CBS/NYT 07/13-16/02: 36% GOP to 42% DEM
CBS/NYT 07/08-09/02: 40% GOP to 41% DEM

Zogby America 07/19-21/02: 34% GOP to 35% DEM
Zogby America 07/12-15/02: 34% GOP to 34% DEM

Newsweek 08/28-29/02: 40% GOP to 45% DEM

CNN/Time 07/02: 40% GOP to 46% DEM

Democracy Corps 07/02: 44% GOP to 44% DEM

FOX News 08/02: 39% GOP to 36% DEM

NBC/WSJ 07/02: 34% GOP to 36% DEM

NPR Poll 07/23-25/02: 40% GOP to 42% DEM

POS 08/26 - 09/01/02: 41% GOP to 38% DEM

AP Poll 08/02: 40% GOP to 40% DEM

LAT Poll 08/02: 39% GOP to 47% DEM

DNC Poll 07/02: 33% GOP to 36% DEM


103 posted on 08/11/2006 8:54:47 AM PDT by AntiGuv ("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

To be fair, she did say she missed .1% of the polls in her analysis.


104 posted on 08/11/2006 9:15:50 AM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

. . . my analysis from 2004 NOT 2002. For 2002, I simply shared with you a post from NRO.


105 posted on 08/11/2006 2:34:15 PM PDT by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson