Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: THE GOP nominee for '08; His name is Duncan Hunter
bushfamfan | 11/24/06 | bushfamfan

Posted on 11/24/2006 5:28:09 AM PST by bushfamfan

I just want to have a thread to discuss House Rep. Duncan Hunter who is going to be one of our GOP nominees. Seems as if a lot of people on FR are complaining about our choices for 2008 when this great man is going to be in the race as well. I just think he needs to get some coverage and wanted to start this thread.

He is the man conservatives should get behind and I think he deserves his own thread to remind us that we do have a great candidate this time if we'd only realize it.

http://www.house.gov/hunter/


TOPICS: US: California; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: aliens; duncanhunter; elections; gopnominees; illegalimmigration; immigrantlist; president
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-278 next last
To: bushfamfan
Pardon me.
From the wording of your post you appear to think that I am a supporter of or even a potential voter for the candidacy of John McCain or Guliani.
WRONG. I detest McCain and will not vote for him under any circumstance regardless of his opponent.
Rudy Guliani is a Democrat Lite, and given the opportunity to vote for a Democrat or a RINO, I will select neither. Period.
My point was clearly and simply that Duncan Hunter is a fine man but has less than no chance for election to higher office.
You seem to think I want to remove Rep.Hunter's chances
for election. That is just silly.
As for having a *bad* 2008? Yeah. I believe so.
101 posted on 11/24/2006 6:48:06 AM PST by Gideon Reader ("The quiet gentleman sitting in the corner sipping Kenya AA and enjoying his Stan Getz CD's".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Kewlhand`tek

Good point. They have nothing to lose and much to gain. But they won't do it. They'd have to stand up to the pimp media, and recent history has shown us they won't.

I think the answer is that the GOP Congress people are too fat and satisfied. And too afraid. The media would protray them as defeated usurpers who deserved prison...blah, blah, blah...Chrissy Matthers would pee his pants.

The Republicans just don't have the gonads to do it.


102 posted on 11/24/2006 6:50:35 AM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan
One of the main reasons a sitting Congressman doesn't make it is because of his voting record. It's too easy for the opposition to point to their voting record and smear them for what it means.

A Governor only sign bills and presents no voting record to determine their position on issues.

103 posted on 11/24/2006 6:51:00 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Gideon Reader

Well, your post only backed up the reality of what a McCain or Giuliani nomination will mean when we will NEED every vote in '08!! Yet because Hunter doesn't have the 'NAME RECOGNITION' or because he's only a 'REP', this quality man and candidate shouldn't have a chance. He IS the BEST. Too bad we are not into nominating fighters and quality candidates. The others are seriously flawed and I don't see them making much of a fight sadly.


104 posted on 11/24/2006 6:52:18 AM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

The voting record goes for ANY candidate.


105 posted on 11/24/2006 6:53:12 AM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Just before the congressional break, the Port Security Bill was up. Frist snuck in an internet gambling ban to it because of course gambling is a part of Port Security. Not!

Anyways, if you voted yes, you are for banning gambling. If you voted no, you are against securing our ports. That is why sitting congressional members don't win the Presidency.


106 posted on 11/24/2006 6:53:49 AM PST by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan

Duncan in my rep.

I like Duncan.

He ain't gonna git it.


107 posted on 11/24/2006 6:54:59 AM PST by SBprone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

I should add that Governors have to take stands on issues too. It remains to be seen how good Romney or the other Governors you think should get the nomination simply because they are GOVERNORS compared to a mere REPRESENTATIVE pion are able to make effective candidates who are able to tell the people effectively. We will see. I just wish people would watch Hunter in this because he will.


108 posted on 11/24/2006 6:56:50 AM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: SBprone

I can see through this thread many share your view and I'd like an apology when you nominate less worthy candidates over him and we lose in '08 with the name recognition.


109 posted on 11/24/2006 6:58:03 AM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: T. Jefferson
Duncan is rock sold, serious, and immediately gives off the aura of being completely respected and trustworthy. As a speaker, he's authoritarian, very informed and interesting to listen to. He has extensive experience, particularly militarily. But the dem voter base is cerebrally challenged and selfish. They want pop culture charisma and want to hear about free money. He can never pull this off.

Guiliani will be the candidate, and Duncan would be a perfect Cheney-like VP choice. The word is he'll carry NY. It's embarrassing listening to freepers throw around McLame's name like he's to be reckoned with. His best showing will be a third place in a primary...he's embarrassingly irrelevant.

Likewise, Hillary is a joke. She can hide all she wants, but in the debates she will be exposed to the point of you hearing imaginary laugh tracks after each debate answer. She is one of the worst public politican speakers ever. She's condescending, inexperienced, shrill, when challenged goes into vein-busting PMS rage, she can't think on her feet, and isn't very smart. She comes across as a nervous, dumb first week used car salesman...completely untrustworthy, particularly during war. A rock has more charisma. One more thing. You can't even look at without your stomach turning. She has more baggage than Saddam. She will not get the women vote, and inspires more dislike in Republican voters than Bin Laden.

110 posted on 11/24/2006 6:58:48 AM PST by T. Jefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan

> a very personable man <

He may be very personable when you meet him one-on-one, and I'm sure he's a nice, polite and decent person.

But he comes across on TV as a dour personality, seldom smiling, usually in a tone of disapprobation about one thing or another. I see none of the sunny optimism of a Reagan or the self-deprecating humor of a W.

Add to this "personality deficit" the fact that he's a Congressman -- a category that hasn't produced a President in 130 years.

Bottom line: He doesn't stand a chance.


111 posted on 11/24/2006 7:00:54 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: T. Jefferson

I don't care how nice, or how qualified he is; he needs one hundred million dollars! That's what it's going to take; along with moving to Iowa and NH for the next two years.

Does he have the money and the fire in the belly?

I don't see it.


112 posted on 11/24/2006 7:07:22 AM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Barbour is too chubby to do well on tv.



Goodness after the fattest guy on Earth just finished House Speaker and a pretty fat Vice President, I think the United States would ignore a candidate being fat. I don't think that would be an issue. In fact, wouldn't he fit in more than a skinny guy in the U.S. We are quite fat as a whole.


113 posted on 11/24/2006 7:10:28 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Sorry, that's my assessment. Same with the ex-fatty Huckleberry. Also both have Southern accents. The media finds this cute on a Democrat but an example of racism on a Republican. Sad but true.

He's got no chance. It's down to Rudy, McLame, and Romney.


114 posted on 11/24/2006 7:13:55 AM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: T. Jefferson
She has more baggage than Saddam.

Much of that baggage appears to be under her eyes.

115 posted on 11/24/2006 7:14:19 AM PST by Disambiguator (This tagline is brought to you by the letter "S" with a slash in front of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: All
What I want most for 2008 is CHOICES. I hate to be stuck already with what the MSM tell us our candidate to be.

Duncan Hunter is fantastic on paper..."a conservative's dream!" :)... but, I also thought Allen was the Messiah a few months ago! :)...

The right candidate will not only have all the qualifications on paper, but It will have the presence... and I pray to God, a bit of flair using the English Language... all those things will help catapult him to the top.

116 posted on 11/24/2006 7:21:18 AM PST by ElPatriota (Let's not forget, we are all still friends despite our differences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: bushfamfan

Duncan Hunter, or someone in that mold is the only way to get me to vote Republican again, ever. No more RATpublicans for this ole boy. Blackbird.


117 posted on 11/24/2006 7:21:58 AM PST by BlackbirdSST (Stay out of the Bushes, unless you're RINO hunting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackbirdSST

More power to you. You sir, are an idealist. God bless you for it.

I still say it's Rudy/McLame or Romney. And that's the fact.

Wish it weren't true.


118 posted on 11/24/2006 7:26:02 AM PST by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: mission9
The purpose of a campaign is to put in the place the team that will govern. At this point, Mclame and Rudy are the closest to having committees in each state which will promote the candidate. I personally prefer Newt for the strategic thinking he offers, his media appearances, and his foundation are at least a starting point for a National Campaign. What evidence do you see that Duncan Hunter has anything like a National footprint or is willing to do what it takes to assemble one?

Hunter knows that there are people like us who want a REAL CONSERVATIVE. When he went to Congress, no one gave him a chance because he was running against an entrenched fanatic Liberal that people had blindly voted for in droves in previous elections.

Can't never tried.

There are several battles in history--that if you looked at them before the began, you would say--this can't be won by Side B......EXAMPLE: Midway, 1942

Throwing up your hands and saying it can't be done is what Manchurain candidate McCain and RINO Juliani wouls like.

119 posted on 11/24/2006 7:26:35 AM PST by radar101 (LIBERALS = Hypocrisy and Fantasy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ElPatriota

Now that looks like a President!


120 posted on 11/24/2006 7:30:47 AM PST by bushfamfan (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRES. 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-278 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson