HEAR: WOMEN DEMOCRATS IN DENIAL-THE CLINTONS' RAPE AND REVICTIMIZATION OF JUANITA BROADDRICK (video)

Hannity + Colmes | 2.28.07 | Mia T

[Mia T]

HEAR: WOMEN DEMOCRATS IN DENIAL
THE CLINTONS' RAPE AND REVICTIMIZATION OF JUANITA BROADDRICK
by Mia T, 2.28.07

HILLARY CLINTON THREATENED JUANITA BROADDRICK
2 WEEKS AFTER BILL CLINTON RAPED HER (VIDEO)

 

 by Mia T, 12.11.06

JUANITA BROADDRICK: They came in, but just before they did, the driver who'd gone to the airport to pick them up came over to me and said that--he was a local pharmacist in this area and I think he's relocated down to Fayetteville--but he told me--he said, "The whole topic of conversation from the airport was you and are you going to be there." He came over to me and said that and I really didn't know what to think about that.

The minute they came in the door--I'm standing over in the living room area and I see them come through the kitchen area and I see her going up to someone and they're pointing at me and I see him go the opposite direction. I assumed when they came in if I was still there that he might come up and say something.

But she made her way just as quick as she could to me. I almost got nauseous when she came over to me.

She came over to me, took ahold of my hand and said, "I've heard so much about you and I've been dying to meet you," or "been wanting to meet you." I can't--I'm just paraphrasing--and she said, "I just want you to know how much that Bill and I appreciate what you do for him."

And I said, "Thank you" and started to turn and walk away.

This woman, this little, soft-spoken--pardon me for the phrase--dowdy woman that would seem unassertive, took ahold of my hand and squeezed it and said, "Do you understand? Everything that you do."

I could have passed out at that moment and I got my hand from hers and I left. She was just holding onto my hand. Because I had started to turn away from her and she held onto my hand and she said, "Do you understand? EVERYTHING that you do," cold chills went up my spine.

That's the first time I became afraid of that woman.



SEAN HANNITY: Do you interpret that to mean that she knew about the incident?



JUANITA BROADDRICK: I certainly do. and thank you for keeping quiet.

ENTIRE VIDEO

The rape took place while Bill was running for governor. Hillary came bursting into the room to talk to two people, one of whom I personally know.

She said "You won't believe what this [expletive] did now. He tried to rape some b*tch."

It was the job of these two to squelch the story.

doug from upland to Sean Hannity,
WABC, 10/16/00

"Crucial to this protective wall was the secret police, a group of private detectives hired to protect hillary and 'Saturday night bill.' Their tactics included digging up dirt on women who might be linked to bill in order to cow them into silence. There is even some evidence of possible physical intimidation."

HEAR DICK MORRIS




 

"I got the letters from Pellicano to these women intimidating them. I had tapes of conversations from Pellicano to the women. I got handwritten letters from the women."

[Pellicano played a critical role in Mr. Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign by "suppressing" "inconvenient" accounts from several women, by concocting fraudulent "proof" (later discredited) that Gennifer Flowers doctored the damning tape of clinton, and again inside the clinton operation in January 1998, four days after the Monica Lewinsky story broke, to falsely paint Monica as simply a lying stalker, a claim later discredited by clinton's own DNA.]

MARY MATALIN
1997, CBS




 

There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that... [f]urthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

GEORGE WILL
SLEAZE, THE SEQUEL

Connecticut Rep. Chris Shays said on a talk radio show Wednesday that, based on secret evidence he reviewed during the impeachment controversy, he believes President Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick, not once, but twice.

Talk-show host Tom Scott of Clear Channel Broadcasting, New Haven (WELI 960) asked Shays about the mysterious impeachment "evidence room," prompting the GOP moderate to say that Broaddrick "disclosed that she had been raped, not once, but twice" to Judiciary Committee investigators.

Shays, who is often hailed by the New York Times for his independent judgment and good sense, found the evidence compelling:

"I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked point blank if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say that it way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

HEAR CHRISTOPHER SHAYS
'Shays Shocker Clinton Raped Broaddrick Twice'
National Review Online
By NR staff
8/02/2000

"Who is Juanita Broaddrick? I've never heard of her!" cried Betty Friedan, the founder of modern feminism. Friedan's outburst came at last Friday's conference, entitled "The Legacy and Future of Hillary Rodham Clinton." Held at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. D.C., the event offered a chilling microcosm of an angry, divided America.

For nearly an hour, a five-woman panel had been debating whether Hillary qualified as a "feminist heroine." I thought Broaddrick's claim of having been raped by Hillary's husband had some bearing on this point, so I broached the subject during the question-and-answer period. Friedan's dyspeptic denial followed.

Was Friedan telling the truth? Maybe. And maybe all those millions of Germans who professed ignorance of the death camps were telling the truth too. The problem is, having admitted her ignorance, Friedan showed no interest in exploring the matter further. And that was the problem with the Germans too.

Totalitarian impulses flourished at the conference. Taking a page from Soviet psychiatry, some Clintonites suggested that Hillary hating might be a mental illness.

Richard Poe
The Hillary Conspiracy

Given the silence from the West Wing, Mrs. Broaddrick this week sought answers from Hillary Clinton, whose telescopic feminism apparently sees injustice to women everywhere except the kind which occurs closer to home.

In a letter to Mrs. Clinton recalling their meeting shortly after the reported assault occurred, she wondered about the significance of Mrs. Clinton's words to her at that time. Thank you, Mrs. Broaddrick says Mrs. Clinton told her, for "everything you do for Bill."

"What did you mean, Hillary?" her letter continued. "Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to keep quiet?"

The not-so-subtle implication of the letter is that Mrs. Clinton is, in fact, her husband's enabler. Dealing with her husband's promiscuity and worse might keep her from dealing with the important issues facing the people of New York, namely her candidacy. One might call it a Faustian bargain except that even Mephistopheles might not lower himself to sign such a deal....

COMPLETE ARTICLE

Did he rape that woman, Juanita Broaddrick?
The Wall Street Journal
EDITORIAL
October 18, 2000




 

I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton's bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering. Do you remember? You told the driver, "Bill has talked so much about Juanita", and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying "we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill". At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, "Everything you do for Bill". You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.

What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question.

Yes, I can answer Brit Hume's question. You are the same Hillary that you were twenty years ago. You are cold, calculating and self-serving. You cannot tolerate the thought that you will soon be without the power you have wielded for the last eight years. Your effort to stay in power will be at the expense of the state of New York. I only hope the voters of New York will wake up in time and realize that Hillary Clinton is not an honorable or an honest person.

I will end by asking if you believe the statements I made on NBC Dateline when Lisa Myers asked if I had been assaulted and raped by your husband?

 

Or perhaps, you are like Vice-President Gore and did not see the interview.

DO YOU REMEMBER?
AN OPEN LETTER TO HILLARY CLINTON
BY JUANITA BROADDRICK
SUNDAY OCT 15, 2000




 

"It's no longer acceptable to say that the abuse and mistreatment of women is cultural. It should be called what it is: criminal."

Hillary Clinton
addressing the UN, 3.4.99

RAPE DETAILS, DOCUMENTATION, VIDEOS

 

STALINIST RISING? ¹
HILLARY CLINTON ABUSE OF POWER
(WHERE IS THE UNREDACTED BARRETT REPORT ANYWAY?)

by Mia T, 2.07.07

 

Peggy Noonan's excellent piece in yesterday's Wall Street Journal is really the story of the death of democracy. At its core it is the description of the human double helix gone terribly awry, of a denatured protein grotesquely twisted, of two mutant, tangled strands of DNA, the basest imaginable of base pairs linked permanently, as firmly as guanine to cytosine, bill inexorably to hillary and conversely, doing what they do best, and doing it relentlessly.

Killing. Killing insidiously. Killing as they pose and pander and feel our pain.

My only complaint is with Peggy Noonan's title. The Mad Boomer, doesn't begin to capture candidate clinton considered separately or even taken as the self-anointed "twofer," permanently conjoined at that cavity conspicuously empty except for ego, that place where brain and soul and guts and heart normally reside.

This is not to say that she -- that they -- are not both quite mad and of that self-indulgent, arrogantly, ignorantly solipsistic age sandwiched flatly between yesterday's innocence and tomorrow's insouciance. Rather, it is that their madness and their boomerism don't even begin to explain their noxious influence: The cloying, internally inconsistent clinton calculus. The unspoken clinton threats. They permeate the atmosphere like a coiling miasma, choking off all freedom.

Even in New York. Especially in New York. When she wrote "The New Colossus," Emma Lazarus hardly had in mind this pair of mutant, deadly, twisted aliens.

Alien Abductions, Flying Saucers + Other Weird Phenomena, c.1992-2000
Mia T, June 9, 1999

ur great national unease is not the result of any 'immoral' war but rather the moral shock of a nascent police state. The greater threat to America is not Osama bin Laden. It is the enemy in our midst. ²

VIRTUAL KILL

The point of political assassination—literal or simply functional—transcends the particular. The apparent target is not an end but a beginning, an example, a warning. Political assassination is really not about the death. It is about the application of the jackboot on the living.


TRACER

Of course, for political assassination to work, it has to be clear—preferably only to the true target(s)—who ordered the hit.

Take, for example, the offing of former Russian spy, Alexander Litvinenko last December from radioactive Polonium-210 poisoning. Like the assassination of Leon Trotsky more than 60 years earlier, the death is uniquely traceable to the Kremlin, and, but for standard-issue cutouts, to its head. The assassination of Litvinenko is the latest in a series of attacks on the outspoken critics of Putin that converge uniformly and precisely on Putin.

There are a lot of ways to make a man's death look like an accident, suicide or a street crime. That wasn't the intent of whoever murdered former KGB agent Alexander Litvinenko in London. By using such an exotic murder weapon—a radioactive isotope known as polonium-210—his killers sent a message: Don't mess with the powers that be in Russia.

The identity of his murderers is likely to remain unknown, but in all probability Litvinenko was poisoned because of his campaign against Russian President Vladimir V. Putin and the KGB's successor, the FSB. He is only the latest to pay with his life for offending Russia's ruling clique. The list of prominent people murdered in the last few years includes crusading journalists such as Anna Politkovskaya (whose death Litvinenko was investigating), politicians, executives and government officials. Others, such as Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko, have narrowly survived assassination attempts or have been exiled or silenced with threats of violence or legal charges.

Alleged tax evasion has been a favorite tool of intimidation. Wielding such dubious accusations, the Kremlin was able to consign Russia's richest man, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, to a Siberian prison camp and to expropriate his giant oil company, Yukos. Whatever the state of his taxes, Khodorkovsky's real sin was to bankroll opposition to Putin.

Max Boot
Stop Petting Putin
Dec. 9, 2006
New York Post

NEO-STALINIST

hillary clinton is our Putin.

To get a glimpse of her Stalinist proclivities, one need only go back to 2 July 2006. As the country prepared to celebrate its independence, missus clinton was applying the jackboot. Stealthily, almost subliminally.

It was clinton's response (by proxy (how else?)) to what was plainly in the field... and what was doubtless in her internal polls: Big problems ahead for the quondam shoo-in. The 'dump hillary' movement within the Democratic Party was getting traction.^{3, 4}

Panicked, the soon-to-be dumpee dispatched longtime clinton fixers, James Carville and Mark J. Penn, to the Washington Post to prop her up yet one more time. The Post Carville-Penn apologia was full of the usual clinton poses, poll-tested phrases and prevarication, but that was not the real story. The real story was the headline: 'The Power of Hillary.'

'The Power of Hillary' had the whiff of raw FBI files and IRS audits. It had the stink of the clinton jackboot.

The message was clear: Be advised! Try to dump hillary and hillary will, quite simply, crush you.

As with Putin and other Stalinists, missus clinton's functional assassination weapons of choice are drummed up charges of tax evasion and character assassination, ⁹ not necessarily in that order.

The Barrett Report, paid for by The People and redacted by the DC mutual protection racket writ large—which is also, we note (and will remember), paid for by The People—documents the clintons' abuse of the IRS and other clinton abuses of power that were—and still are—routinely used to silence clinton critics.


FAKE OUT  

If functional assassination is a clinton staple, the reputation for assassination-in-fact is the clinton coup de grâce.

To make sure their repulation always precedes them, the clintons never miss an opportunity to spread the rumors around themselves. By repeating every allegation of clinton murder and mayhem—while affecting an incredulous air, of course—the clintons intimidate and silence their critics even as they marginalize the enemy.

The outrageousness of the clintons' crimes, actual and apparent, will always work to the clintons' advantage, making the disabling of these flagrant psychopaths all the more challenging.

But disable them we must.

For the children.

CLINTON ABUSE OF POWER
DOCUMENTATION

December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO ALL AMERICANS

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton

Dear Concerned Americans,

hillary clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, hillary clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about missus clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton


COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005, 2007

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

[Mia T]

 

The three elephants in the room are:

1- the clintons' ¹ rape of Juanita Broaddrick ²

2- the clintons' terrorism failure ³.

3- the clintons' documented abuse of power ⁴ (redacted via clinton abuse of power!)

Our candidate must understand and use THE 120 PAGES THAT WILL SINK THE CLINTON CANDIDACY YESTERDAY AND PUT AN END TO THE CLINTONS ONCE AND FOR ALL.

It doesn't require more than half a brain and 10% of the data to understand why this self-absorbed, noxious, vacant pair must not be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office ever again.

We must make sure the electorate get at least 10% of the data.

And we must target the demographic missus clinton is targeting: women, and especially young, single women.

For power and treasure, missus clinton abused women and the vulnerable all her life. Now, in her final assault, she is exploiting them, abusing them yet again. We cannot allow this to happen.

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[PhilDragoo]

I am Rod 'em Alinsky--Hear me roar!

[pinz-n-needlez]

Thank you, Mia.

This turns my stomach. It's so much easier to tease about the "waspy chintz floral" pillows.

But this incident is the measure of the awfulness of this couple. And the path of destruction they are willing to plow up to meet their own selfish goals.

[Mia T]

It's also a measure of the awfulness of the professional pols and frankly, the D rank and file who haven't thrown these two despicable creatures out of govt and into the slammer, at a minimum....

[mojo114]

BUMP to tomorrow morning prime time.

[Mia T]

It's so much easier to tease about the "waspy chintz floral" pillows.

So true.

Not sure whose stage presence is more ridiculous, hillary's or Al's.

But at least Al Gore doesn't try to sound human.

To understand why this is such an advantage for Gore, simply consider missus clinton's recent 'conversation' (with herself).

It was risible. Unintentional theater of the absurd:
A chintzed-and-powdered villain--a soulless, angry, arrogant scold--oozing cloying, saccharine-coated evil, pulsating to the metronomic swing of stubby appendages--claws too short to grab its prey.

(Gesticulation is a dud's only sign of life... and then only if she has a speech coach to prod her.)

The performance was nothing if not humiliating: A direct measure of hillary clinton's hunger for power. Which reminds me... enough of that red Klingon power jacket already.

from:
CLINTON vs. GORE + GEFFEN: POST-OSCAR ANALYSIS
(HAS HOLLYWOOD DUMPED HILLARY?)
CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART TWO
by Mia T, 2.26.07


HEAR DENNIS MILLER: WHY GEFFEN DUMPED HILLARY,
WHY CLINTON 'DOES NOT WANT TO LOCK HORNS WITH DAVID GEFFEN'
CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART THREE (video and transcript)
by Mia T, 2.27.07

[jmaroneps37]

The rat is anti American. He has been since at least the Civil War. He will NEVER admit the guilt of a fellow anti American since anyone who hates America is his friend. Thus they will NEVER admit clinochhio raped Broderick, never!

[George W. Bush]

Great stuff. People need to be reminded of what the Xlintons really are.

[Mia T]

The rare exception.

... And then there is Geffen:

HEAR DENNIS MILLER: WHY GEFFEN DUMPED HILLARY,
WHY CLINTON 'DOES NOT WANT TO LOCK HORNS WITH DAVID GEFFEN'
CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART 4 (video/transcript)


CLINTON vs. GORE + GEFFEN: POST-OSCAR ANALYSIS
(HAS HOLLYWOOD DUMPED HILLARY?)
CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART 3


AL GORE, THE OSCAR, THE NOBEL, THE CLINTONS + DAVID GEFFEN
CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART 2


WHY THE GEFFEN IMBROGLIO SIGNALS CLINTON'S END
'HILLARY'S STRATEGY--NOBODY GETS TO CRITICIZE HER' :CHRIS MATTHEWS
with a WARNING FOR DAVID GEFFEN
CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART 1

[Mia T]

Thanks, W. :)

[Mia T]

Thank you, jla.:)
Hope you get back to your 'biting' self soon. ;)