Posted on 04/21/2007 6:42:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
We've got some real challenges facing us. FR was established to fight against government corruption, overstepping, and abuse and to fight for a return to the limited constitutional government as envisioned and set forth by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and other founding documents.
One of the biggest cases of government corruption, overstepping and abuse that I know of is its disgraceful headlong slide into a socialist hell. Our founders never intended for abortion to be the law of the land. And they never intended the Supreme Court to be a legislative body. They never intended God or religion to be written out of public life. They never intended government to be used to deny God's existence or for government to be used to force sexual perversions onto our society or into our children's education curriculum. They never intend for government to disarm the people. They never intended for government to set up sanctuary cities for illegals. They never intended government to “rule” over the people and or to take their earnings or private property or to deprive them of their constitutional rights to free speech, free religion, private property, due process, etc. They never intended government to seize the private property of private citizens through draconian asset forfeiture laws or laws allowing government to take private property from lawful owners to give to developers. Or to seize wealth and redistribute it to others. Or to provide government forced health insurance or government forced retirement systems.
All of the above are examples of ever expanding socialism and tyranny brought to us by liberals/liberalism.
FR fights against the liberals/Democrats in all of these areas and always will. Now if liberalism infiltrates into the Republican party and Republicans start promoting all this socialist garbage, do you think that I or FR will suddenly stop fighting against it? Do you think I'm going to bow down and accept abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, global warming, illegal alien lawbreakers, gun control, asset forfeiture, socialism, tyranny, totalitarianism, etc, etc, etc, just so some fancy New York liberal lawyer can become president from the Republican party?
Do you really expect me to do that?
Kinda close to home, huh, dirt?
Rudophiles as an aconym for pedophiles? That’s beyond pathetic.
Ditto!
Since folks don’t come much more conservative than me, of course I would NEVER support a candidate such as Rudy.
So far Thompson, Hunter, and Tancredo have appeared to be the most conservative, but there is alot of time to wait and see who I do support. I have not dug my heals in on one candidate, but I think my tagline should make it clear as to who I won’t support.
Sorry if my posts have not been clear enough.
Sorry, my mistake. Don’t blame CWCT. There is a central scrutinizer, with a *z* that comes up with no posting history. I had heard he was banned and checked the *z* one. If it’s simply misspelled, it comes up with *The requested document does not exist on this server.*
Anyway, I alerted him to that and CWCT took my word for it. I thought I checked carefully enough. I didn’t know there were two FReepers with such similar names.
My apologies, especially to central scrutiniser, with an *s*.
So, you’re now supporting Duncun Hunter?
Awesome. He’s a great American.
Maybe there’s hope for you yet.
But, weren’t you ridiculing him awhile back? Or was that someone else?
I have failed my first test. I did not log off. :-(
I'll let you have the cheesecake, I'll bring a bag of Oreo's and a case of Diet Cokes. That will cancel out the cookies calories. That really works...doesn't it?
*Glancing over my shoulder-no, it doesn't work, but it's a pleasant thought.*
This thread is awesome.
Del4hope doesn’t support Guiliani.
Neither do I. Or ever would support a ‘liberal’ in ‘Conservative’ clothing.
A _’phile’ is someone who is facinated with sumtin, like an audiophile or stereophile or sumtin.
For some reason you all think your indispensable when, in reality, you don't amount to a pimple on the ass of FR.
*rolls eyes* Shakespeare? At least be original in your possible opus.
OOoops!
I see you answered already.
Oh, well. Doesn’t hurt to have ‘back up’ once in a while.
:0)
Ooh-rah!
What is the WideAwake site?
(sorry, it’s a looooong thread! lol)
It is so true that if you give a liberal the open mike or board and let him talk, he will eventually hang himself. LOL...boy are these RudyBots going to be surprised. They are soooooooo certain that those polls won’t change lmao.
They are jumping on board like good Party Hacks to get those low level campaign jobs and hopefully a schedule C political appointment in WashDC. They are going to be in for a piznvinegar surprise and they deserve every bit of it.
Dictionaries are cool.
Dearest Sponsor!
I too have failed my first and second test!!
Ill bypass the cheesecake if we can make it oreos with skim milk instead (that still balances out the cookie calories, right)?lol!
*looks sheepishly at pph...If we eat standing up, there are NO calories*!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.