Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul to uphold any Bush veto of HR 1592
US Congress statement ^ | 05.07.2007 | Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX)

Posted on 05/09/2007 7:18:18 AM PDT by malibu2008

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

1 posted on 05/09/2007 7:18:23 AM PDT by malibu2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: malibu2008

Ron Paul gets it.


2 posted on 05/09/2007 7:20:51 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malibu2008

So if I call somebody stupid, who in fact has done poorly in school, does that constitute as a hate crime?

If so, get the handcuffs ready because I have an explosive mouth.


3 posted on 05/09/2007 7:20:58 AM PDT by wastedyears (To a liberal, "feeling safe" is far more important than "being safe" Credit to TruthShallSetYouFree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malibu2008

4 posted on 05/09/2007 7:21:47 AM PDT by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Hahaaha, what a great comic.


5 posted on 05/09/2007 7:22:51 AM PDT by wastedyears (To a liberal, "feeling safe" is far more important than "being safe" Credit to TruthShallSetYouFree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: malibu2008

Wake up America — this atrocity of a bill is typical of the way the radical left wants to CONTROL YOUR LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS — by making everything that they do not want said about their criminal and corrupt ways a crime.

Wake up now!!! Thank God that Bush will veto this freedom-destroying crap of a bill. Your socialist left at work.


6 posted on 05/09/2007 7:23:47 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

why can’t he declare an executive order deporting all Democrats ? Use the sedition act as fuel for the fire .


7 posted on 05/09/2007 7:34:15 AM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Wake up America — this atrocity of a bill is typical of the way the radical left wants to CONTROL YOUR LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS — by making everything that they do not want said about their criminal and corrupt ways a crime.

The Soviets, whose American adherents have thoroughly infiltrated the Democrat party, understood that all you need do to control good men is to make so many laws that it's impossible to avoid breaking any of them. Then you brand him guilty and and he's much easier to manipulate.

8 posted on 05/09/2007 7:34:18 AM PDT by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: malibu2008

I have asked several proponents of such “hate crimes” legislation the same questions - and have NEVER received and answer - not even a stupid answer:

1. If someone murders me because I am in the way of a robbery, and someone else is murdered and the murderer has expressed hatred for a race - does that make the one murdered by the racist any more dead than me?

2. Someone gets in a fight with a homosexual after having sendt an email against gay marriage - does that make them more guilty than someone in a fight with a straight person?

3. Why stop at protecting gays? how about enhanced penalties for those who victimized old people? How about those pro-abortion folks who assaulted the peaceful anti-abortion protesters outside of an abortion clinic? How about teachers who are assaulted because a “student” really hates his teachers? How about the school shooter who takes a gun to school and murders his classmates because of his “HATE”? How about the gang member who shoots up a house because a member of a rival gang (who he of course, hates) lives there?

4. So - doesn’t all crime involve some form of hate? If we loved one another - then we would not commit crimes against each other...

The truth is - hate crimes legislation is 100% a tool to silence views that are contrary to the liberal worldview.


9 posted on 05/09/2007 7:39:16 AM PDT by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

The truth is - hate crimes legislation is 100% a tool to silence views that are contrary to the liberal worldview.

:::
Exactly. And totally unconstitutional. Another reason that the socialists must be taken out of the majority in the Congress, and be kept out of the White House.


10 posted on 05/09/2007 7:47:08 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Exactly. And totally unconstitutional. Another reason that the socialists must be taken out of the majority in the Congress, and be kept out of the White House.

Unfortunately, a couple of the so-called "leading" candidates for the GOP nomination fully support such legislation - and are essentially socialists of the same mold as the one's currently pushing this junk on us.

11 posted on 05/09/2007 7:52:31 AM PDT by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: malibu2008

Ron Paul for POTUS!


12 posted on 05/09/2007 7:58:22 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian; traviskicks

ping


13 posted on 05/09/2007 8:03:42 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; The majority are satisfied with a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Ron Paul, the republican that if had his way, Saddam would still be in power to rape and murder the innocent? That Ron Paul? The one that voted against the Iraq war resolution? The one that voted no against it and not present? The Ron Paul that would retreat from Iraq and give them a victory, the same Al Qaeda that attacked us on 9/11 killing 3000 of our citizens? Ron Paul, the republican that voted with a few democrats to not support Israel in its war with Hezzbollah? That Ron Paul?

No thanks. He is not fit to be a dog catcher IMO. My apologies to dog catchers.
14 posted on 05/09/2007 8:10:13 AM PDT by jrooney (The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

All violent crimes are hate crimes. Glad to see some common sense still left with at least a few individuals in Congress.


15 posted on 05/09/2007 8:19:27 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Well, he’s on the pro-employed-citizen (read anti-government) side of just about every issue. I realize Libertarians aren’t good for everything, but the current crap of Democrats and “republic”ans are all too authoritarian to fulfill the vision of the Founders. How many times has the Bush administration filed amicus briefs upholding the position of an out-of-control government over that of a private citizen? I’m not talking about terrorists here, think Elliot.


16 posted on 05/09/2007 8:30:25 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

No, that’s not this Ron Paul. You must be thinking of some other Ron Paul. One that is a figment of your imagination.


17 posted on 05/09/2007 8:33:24 AM PDT by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears; Vaquero

On the “rough days” I pick up the Calvin and Hobbes. It never fails to lift my spirits.


18 posted on 05/09/2007 8:35:35 AM PDT by Loud Mime ("It is not intellect which makes a great scientistl; it is chararacter." Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima

Sorry there Iwo, it is that Ron Paul. He did everything I posted. I was mocking him because he is a pathetic joke.


19 posted on 05/09/2007 8:42:50 AM PDT by jrooney (The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

Ron Paul who voted against the Iraq Resolution but instead offered a Declaration of War against Iraq to get rid of the dependence of the UN justification for the military action to keep our sovereignty intact and to keep the constitutional power of Congress to declare war in Congress instead of transferring the power to the POTUS. Yep that Ron Paul.


20 posted on 05/09/2007 8:43:11 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson