Posted on 08/31/2007 10:42:27 PM PDT by april15Bendovr
Understanding left-Wing Fecal Spoons and Iraq
The Left has been trying hard for years to interfere with the dissemination of any information that could help the American public understand Saddam's links to Al Qaeda or terrorism. By doing so, it has provided aid to our enemy.
The most notorious example of this was when the NY Times actively acted to destroy the Docex Project.
What is the Docex Project?
The Docex Project consists of millions of captured pre-war documents that had resided deep within a warehouse. These documents have shed light on links between Saddam and Al Qaeda. They were originally headquartered in Doha, Qatar, and were released by John Negroponte for volunteers to translate.
What did The NY Times do?
The newspaper used ideological-driven so-called experts to destroy the program. The focus of their activism was to point out nuclear fears in order to destroy any evidence that could bolster our reasons for being in Iraq.
Please visit the links at the end of this article provided by Joseph Shahda, a translator who worked on the Docex Project. He provided me with two letters to descibe how he felt when the program was terminated.
Let's examine the NY Times article titled,
U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Primer
(Excerpt) Read more at cdonohoe.townhall.com ...
Ping
Oh man, get out the tinfoil. Here we go again...
If your an ER Doc I wouldn't want you diagnosing the war just on how you feel rather than what you should actually have knowledge of metaphorically speaking.
Treat this war like establishing your clients history and physicals. Gather all your facts before creating a treatment plan. Or if you want you can just treat liberals like all the addicts that come into ER’s Doctor shopping medication. Enabling is something liberals do well including being useful idiots for our enemy.
Keep the tinfoil. You might need it for the Cindy Sheehan crowd.
I can’t get your link to work.
The link to your source is dead. And what is a “fecal spoon,” or do I not want to know?
Fecal spoon is slang for a person who stirs up crap. Works behind the scenes to manipulate people.
I asked the moderator to correct the link. Sorry for the technical difficulty.
weirdest headline of the year award
Really, now?
Suddenly the NYTs runs a article worrying about Saddams nuclear information being on the internet, Gee the NYTs tells people everyday that Saddam didn't have WMDs and was pretty much just a benevolent dictator. The next morning in Congress the dims were foaming at the mouth that this information needed to be hidden, Something they can't manage to do when it comes to actual rouge countries such as N Korea or Iran. Perhaps you have a better explaination for why a newspaper which has and will publish classified information which would harm the USAs interests suddenly finds some information which it thinks shouldn't be available. My experience tells me it was the other documents which were exposing the truth about Saddam, WMDs and terror organizations that the NYTs and the Dims wanted silenced. So what is it do you have some insight which shows why the NYTs suddenly admitted that Saddam had a nuclear program and that it was so dangerous it should never see the light of day? But bring very good information because as I said I followed the document release closely and I know many documents were not supporting the liberal mantra about Saddam. After all everyone knows the NYTs wouldn't run interference in promotion of the progressive agenda, like leaking very real programs which imperil not only the USAs security but agents in the field as well.
Check out what Peter D. Zimmerman said in this ABC report.
I wish there was a transcript. I had to do the best I could quoting what he had stated in the video
“We found one right wing website that said we were nuts. That we didn’t have a way to build a dirty bomb and we were just trying to use the T-word (Terrorism) to get grant money for our research.”
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2007/s2006971.htm
However; they suddenly are concerned about releasing classified when it justifies the U.S. action in Iraq.
These are indisputable facts. Are you still calling for tin foil? Give it to me straight Doctor, I can take it.
ping
ping
So I Guess The FMSO Documents Are Legit
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/008423.php
I found this link originally on the Tammy Bruce blog article titled
NYT Confirms: Saddam Had Advanced Nuclear Plans
http://tammybruce.com/2006/11/nyt_confirms_iraq.php
She States
"This blog will never link to that leftist mouthpiece the NYT, but here, in part, is what the NYT is reporting:
The documents, roughly a dozen in number, contain charts, diagrams, equations and lengthy narratives about bomb building that nuclear experts who have viewed them say go beyond what is available on the Internet and in other public forums. For instance, the papers give detailed information on how to build nuclear firing circuits and triggering explosives, as well as the radioactive cores of atom bombs.
Captain Ed at Captain's Quarters has the best analysis of the situation. In part he notes:
This is apparently the Times' November surprise, but it's a surprising one indeed. The Times has just authenticated the entire collection of memos, some of which give very detailed accounts of Iraqi ties to terrorist organizations. Just this past Monday, I posted a memo which showed that the Saddam regime actively coordinated with Palestinian terrorists in the PFLP as well as Hamas and Islamic Jihad. On September 20th, I reposted a translation of an IIS memo written four days after 9/11 that worried the US would discover Iraq's ties to Osama bin Laden."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.