Posted on 09/02/2007 11:30:37 AM PDT by doug from upland
AN UNWANTED CAMPAIGN STOP FOR HILLARY IN 2008 - Los Angeles Superior Court
DATELINE Los Angeles
FreeRepublic.com
Doug from Upland
It is called the Stanley Mosk Courthouse after the man who was the longest serving justice on the California Supreme court, 37 years, from 1964-2001. The address is 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, California 90012.
During the campaign of 2008, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton will be paying a visit, but it wont be by choice. She wont be sitting in the lawyer chair. She will be sitting in the witness/defendant chair.
The case is Paul v Clinton, an historic civil case involving an impeached former president and sitting senator accused of a committing business fraud and collapsing a public company, Stan Lee Media. Yes, Spiderman Stan Lee. The case is expected to highlight information over which the mainstream media has maintained a cone of silence. That information is the greatest campaign finance fraud in history and the compromising of all three branches of government by a senator whose power is second only to that of the President of the United States. Many journalists, newspaper editors, and TV and radio news shows are in possession of a wealth of information about the case that has been discussed on the phone with them and sent to them. It includes compelling documents, photos, and video of Hillary Clinton.
On September 7, 2007, a 3-judge panel of the California Appellate Court will hear oral arguments in the case. Despite having been alerted, the mainstream media has not seen fit to report that news. Apparently it did not meet the criteria pursuant to the masthead logo of the NY TIMES - All the news thats fit to print. Some news is more fit than others.
Clinton counsel David Kendall of the powerful Washington DC law firm, Williams and Connolly, will endeavor to convince the three justices that his client is not a felon, should remain protected by Californias anti-SLAPP law, and should not join her husband and others as defendants. The court should quickly make its decision, and discovery can then proceed. If Kendall loses, he may appeal to the California Supreme Court. That procedure is not expected to be a lengthy one, and the court ruled previously that it would not throw out the case regarding the former impeached president.
*** For full disclosure and in fairness to Mr. Kendall, I can say unequivocally that I have not seen him sit on his briefcase during any of the hearings I've attended.
Even if she is not brought back into the case as a defendant, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is going to be under oath. At a hearing in 2006, the Superior Court trial judge, Aurelio Munoz told Kendall, I will entertain no motion that prevents Mrs. Clinton from testifying did you hear that, Mr. Kendall?
The court case of a former impeached president and a sitting senator might normally be a headline generator. Unfortunately, the shameless partisanship of the mainstream media is on display as never before. It is there for everyone to see.
As background for those who may not be familiar with the issues in the case, that would be viewers of CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC and readers of the NY Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, Chicago Sun Times, Boston Globe, Denver Post, Dallas Morning News, Seattle Post Intelligencer, Detroit Free Press, Philadelphia Inquirer, Minneapolis (Red)Star Tribune, The Plain Dealer, the Arizona Republic, Houston Chronicle, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Miami Herald, DesMoines Register, Arkansas Democrat Gazette, TIME Magazine, Newsweek, US News & World Report . well, you get the idea --- we are glad to be of service and welcome aboard. Here are some links that you might find helpful.
To anyone from the mainstream media who is just starting the learn about the greatest campaign finance fraud in history, I welcome you. We have regular and Decaf, and Ill even supply some donuts. Get busy reading. Dont you think it is about time to do your job? Does the word journalist mean something to you?
ALL OF THE DOCUMENTS: HILLCAP DOT ORG
EQUAL JUSTICE FOUNDATION SITE with latest documentary trailer: EJFA DOT ORG
THE TIMELINE: This tells the story with links
THIS ILLEGAL DONATION (with photos) FROM A JAPANESE NATIONAL HAS NEVER BEEN RETURNED OR REPORTED
THE LARGEST DONOR IN HISTORY HAS THREE TIMES DEMANDED THAT HILLARY RETURN HIS ILLEGAL DONATION
OH MY, "SPIDERMAN" STAN LEE ADMITTING TO "EXCHANGING CHECKS" IN HIS VIDEO DEPOSITION....WHOOPS!
THE SMOKING GUN VIDEO. An agent of Hillary, a White House employee, helped solicit a 1.6 mil in-kind contribution. This video is evidence of Hillary's knowledge, involvement, approval, and participation.
HILLARY'S CAMPAIGN FINANCE "IRREGULARITIES" REPORTED TO THE FBI FIELD OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES
HILLARY SPOKESMAN HOWARD WOLFSON HAS MAINTAINED THE LIE FOR SEVEN YEARS
TRUTH BOATING HILLARY CAMPAIGN - we need your help to break the news blockade of the mainstream media
ART MOORE'S WND STORY ABOUT THE TRUTH BOATING HILLARY CAMPAIGN
MOMMY DEAREST SETS UP CHELSEA FOR PERJURY
DO NOT MISS THE 7-PART "FRAUDULENT SENATOR" SERIES
AND FINALLY, JOIN ME IN A FUN SING-ALONG
I assume that this inducement (campaign donations in kind or otherwise) would have to be brought out in detail in the civil case. And in doing so the illegality of the contributions will be part of the testimony?
"You run that baby. There's not much riding on this. Just the First Amendment and the Constitution of the United States."
Yes, it will all be brought out in testimony.
I would like Howard Wolfson to answer under oath why he told the Washington Post that the campaign would take no money from Peter Paul. Behind the scenes, the campaign was even asking for more. Peter has the fax from Rosen asking for another 100K that Hillary had promised the Working Families Party in New York. Yes, I can’t wait to hear from Wolfson.
THANKS AGAIN, DOUG.
Printing and sharing with as many as I can afford who might spread the word from positions of influence.
Emailing also . . .
Do you have a template of an e-mail outlining this case that you can share ... so that we may use to pass on to others?
Good idea. I’ve sent several different versions. I’ll create a simple one so the mainstrem media will be able to understand it.
giggle
STEP BY STEP HOW TO DO IT.
On the site of a newspaper or TV station or radio station, you will have to search for their contact info. Very often they will have an internal email for news tips. If that is the case, here is an example of how I sent a message yesterday.
1. Media guide - http://www.abyznewslinks.com/unite.htm
2. Clicked on California
3. Clicked on USA TODAY
4. At the bottom of the screen, clicked on CONTACT US - http://www.usatoday.com/marketing/feedback.htm?POE=FOOTER
(sometimes the websites have a HOME or ABOUT US or CONTACT US button)
5. Clicked link for EDITORIAL - http://feedbackforms.usatoday.com/marketing/feedback/feedback-online.aspx?type=12
6. From pull down menu, chose the category NEWS
7. Left name of dougfromupland and email address
8. Left the comment
If you see an AP report from, say Iowa, it would have been written by an AP reporter in Iowa. Call the AP in New York and ask for his phone number - 212.621.1500
I have found it helpful to always make a phone call first and try to get an email from someone in the newsroom. That can save time searching their site for an email, and someone will be looking for your communication.
I have found Superpages.com to be a great asset for finding TV and radio stations or newspapers. On the top line put in Boston Globe...on the second line put in Boston, MA. Click search and it will give you a number or several possible numbers. Either call the main number or try to find a news desk. Anytime you call a newspaper, ask for the person or the newsroom.
If you get someone on the phone who wants to talk to the person doing the documentary film, get their phone number and send me FReepmail.
HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF AN EMAIL TO SEND (if you simply scroll over this and save it, you can dump it into an email)
email subject line: Hillary under oath soon in Paul v Clinton
Hello, Mr. Journalist. I wanted to give you a heads up on an historic civil suit that will soon be heard in Los Angeles Superior Court that may change everything for the 2008 election. Hillary, Bill, the leadership of the Democratic Party, and many in Hillary’s inner circle are on the potential witness list. This case will be heard in the middle of the presidential campaign.
On Sept. 7, 2007 a 3-judge panel of the California Appellate Court will hold oral arguments and will determine soon thereafter whether Hillary will join her husband as a defendant. If she is not brought back into the case as a defendant, the trial judge made it clear to her counsel, David Kendall, that she will be under oath testifying.
Evidence in the trial is going to reveal the greatest campaign finance fraud ever, four false FEC reports, and Hillary’s role in the solicitation of an illegal $1.6 million hard money, in-kind donation. Unlike any other evidence before, Peter Paul has several hours of home video of Hillary Clinton.
All the documents are here - http://hillcap.org
Equal Justice Foundation site with documentary trailer - http://www.ejfa.org
The TIMELINE with many links - http://www.ejfa.org/en/index.php/en/hillary-timeline/
The “Smoking Gun Video” - http://youtube.com/watch?v=qcbg72tK_ks
The largest donor in history has demanded the return of his illegal contribution - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1888596/posts
Illegal contribution from Japanese citizen never reported or returned (with photos) - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1889225/posts
BUMP
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=hsu&btnG=Search+News
On that search, I found a story by Bloomberg and clicked on it. The author’s email was at the bottom of the story, so I sent him a message yesterday.
Bookmark
Stay safe Doug! Thanks to you for your tireless efforts!
you are exactly right about Imus
Hillary’s STOOGE, Sharpton got Imus fired!! PAYBACK would be a BITCH!
I can’t wait for Imus to come back. I think he would be very interested in going after THE BEAST.
He COULD come back as a WIMP.......NOT!! He needs to come back with a VENGENANCE against HILLARY!!!
I’ll grab some popcorn and watch, but I won’t believe it until I see it.
Thanks for the ping!
I’ll be there at the appellate hearing on Sept. 7 and then speaking to a California Republican Assembly group that night.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.