Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Ron Paul supporter scams! Change Party Affiliation to Republican?
Daily Paul web site ^ | May 29, 2007 | DailyPaul.com

Posted on 09/07/2007 8:46:32 AM PDT by PlainOleAmerican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-215 next last
To: OPS4

He is certainly aligned with Demorats!


61 posted on 09/07/2007 9:32:08 AM PDT by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

Perfect!


62 posted on 09/07/2007 9:35:53 AM PDT by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
NO TRUE "CONSTITUTIONALIST" WOULD EVER USE SUCH TACTICS TO MANIPULATE A REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC!
That's funny, we've been doing it to the 'Rats since I've been on here...
63 posted on 09/07/2007 9:43:16 AM PDT by Axenolith (The Market is a harsh mistress...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican

Why are his followers a threat?


64 posted on 09/07/2007 9:43:52 AM PDT by nuconvert ("Terrorism is not the enemy. It is a means to the ends of militant Islamism." MZJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican

One man, one vote. Parties are just coalitions of people. I know what your objection is, that it’s not a “true” change of party. But the reality is that some will be; Paul is wrong on Iraq but he’s right on small government and Constitutional limits on the Federal Government.


65 posted on 09/07/2007 9:46:27 AM PDT by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican

Who’s Ron Paul?


66 posted on 09/07/2007 9:47:18 AM PDT by petercooper ("Daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime." - Nicole Gelinas - 02-10-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
***Paul/Paul '08***


67 posted on 09/07/2007 9:48:08 AM PDT by Disciplinemisanthropy (...and that, friends, is what grinds my gears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
This is all a build up for one thing, in my opinion...

A 3rd Party run by Paul.

In a Hillary vs. Rudy vs. Paul election, who do you think wins?

That's right...

Say hello to 2008s version of Ross Perot.
68 posted on 09/07/2007 9:49:03 AM PDT by Antoninus (Republicans who support Rudy owe Bill Clinton an apology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican

Remind me again, there was a certain group of people that Reagan brought over to the party. Started with a D....guess they shouldn’t have gotten involved either...


69 posted on 09/07/2007 9:51:35 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

And this tactic supports the legitimate constitutional process how exactly?


70 posted on 09/07/2007 9:52:34 AM PDT by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut

why the ‘dr’ in quotes? I heard he was an M.D.


71 posted on 09/07/2007 9:52:48 AM PDT by RolandBurnam (soylent brown is poop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
The only important difference between Nazi-ism, Fascism, Communism, Socialism and Liberalism is the spelling, and that the last group hasn’t got the brains to figure it out. - Bill Vance

What does that statement have to do with the comment you're replying to? In any fashion?

72 posted on 09/07/2007 9:52:48 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican

Who cares, this whackjob just opens his mouth and people go “whoa”, what a whackjob.

My dieheard liberal relatives emailed me yesterday even saying “this guy sounds 75% Democrat and is a complete nutjob”. For which I had the pleasure of reminding them that they are indicting themselves. :)


73 posted on 09/07/2007 9:52:54 AM PDT by Chicos_Bail_Bonds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears

You said you were a LIBERAL!


74 posted on 09/07/2007 9:55:59 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican

Wow. That’ll get him all the way up to 2%, perhaps...


75 posted on 09/07/2007 9:56:19 AM PDT by rock_lobsta (Doing my part to warm up the planet... Because Bikinis Beat Burkas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham

They may be anti-war, but many of Ron Pauls supporters generally like his SMALLER Government Stances (which would be very much Reaganesque): Mind you I am not a Ron Paul supporter, yet this inacuracy at calling most of his suppoters “anti-American” must be pointed out!

I infact like Tom Tancredo!


76 posted on 09/07/2007 9:57:05 AM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Disciplinemisanthropy; All

Paul Cicero in ’08!

“Because he might move slow, but he doesn’t have to move for anybody.”

77 posted on 09/07/2007 9:58:46 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

Actually, I ahve tow points...

1) It all comes down to whether one believes America has a right to defend herself here and aborad or not. Those who think we do, know what we are doing in Iraq and beyond. Those who think we don’t, think we shouldn’t be in Iraq or anywhere else. Ron Paul and his supporters, like Sheehan, Teddy and most liberal Democratic Socialists are on the wrong side of this issue.

2) Ron Paul is also wrong on his notions of smaller less powerful government. Not wrong to desire such things, because these ideas are entirely “conservative”. But the desire alone isn’t enough and that’s where libertarians are wrong.

Supporting or allowing liberal social policies to exist makes it impossible limit or reduce the size and scope of the federal government that must deal with the natural social consequences of liberal social policies.

I have nothing personally against Homosexuals. But my tax dollars would not be going into AIDS research and government would not be involved in AIDS research if a moral society was a bit less carefree with their sexual exploits.

Not to pick on any particualr group, but this was an easy example.

This is where libertarians miss the target. They are right to desire smaller more limited government. But wrong to overlook what causes BIGGER more POWERFUL government reaching further and further into our pockets to fund social programs that wouldn’t be necessary in a socially responsible society.


78 posted on 09/07/2007 10:02:21 AM PDT by PlainOleAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: PlainOleAmerican
Now read their plan for hijacking the official Republican nomination by directing anti-war & anti-America voters across the "fruited" plains to "change voter registrations to Republican" for the sole purpose of hijacking the Republican nomination process!

I would think that GOP leaders would welcome Ron Paul's efforts to expand the party's shrinking base.....that if they don't want a repeat of the 2006 election debacle.

79 posted on 09/07/2007 10:03:44 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears; Allegra; ejonesie22; Badeye; SoldierDad
BB: If the "new members" are antiAmerican antiwar jerks, then, ummmm, no, we don't need them. Just as you haven't been missed on your vacation from the GOP, they won't be missed either and neither will the most dishonest flip flopper, hypocrite and insufferable peacecreep in the history of GOP POTUS contests. Not to worry, though, he gets crushed on schedule as soon as the real voting starts.

PaleoPaulie: Can't be bothered to defeat our Islamofascist enemies. Can't be bothered to FEDERALLY outlaw abortion since that only involves innocent human lives and not cash Almighty. Can't be bothered to DO almost anything federally other than to lard up appropriations bills with genuinely unconstitutional pork for his constituents knowing that the bill will be passed over his NO vote as he poses for "fiscally responsible" and "constitutionalist" holy pictures. Wow, what a candidate!!!! Throw the little tax-subsidized shrimp on the barbie!

80 posted on 09/07/2007 10:03:58 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson