Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Hillary Beatable?
Self | 10-18-07 | Self

Posted on 10/19/2007 10:42:17 PM PDT by Nat Turner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Nat Turner
I really enjoyed this post. Thank you!
21 posted on 10/20/2007 3:43:05 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olezip

So, what would that make Clintbilly? The first “laddie”?


22 posted on 10/20/2007 3:49:46 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nat Turner
She is definitely beatable. She just needs to be pushed hard on several fronts and she will eventually go into full self destruct mode. It is in her personality. But we need to push her buttons. They are going to pull all the stops out on voter fraud. Saying that 25% of the Republican women would vote for her foretells what their fraud campaign will look like. Every election they tout some mythical new source of Democrat voters to cover their planned voter fraud. It was 10% nationally in 2004. They may be going for 15%. But I don’t think even that will put her over the top. It will make it much closer than it should be though. The key states for the Republicans may actually be Pennsylvania and New Jersey. If we take one of those away from the Democrats it is all over. And there are several scenarios where that is likely to happen.

For all the talk of a 3rd party conservative, what you are much more likely to see a 3 party far left candidate. Especially as the war continues to go well.

When it comes to money, I think a lot of Republicans are keeping their powder dry for the nominee. I think the Clinton donors are more finite and she has maxed most of them out already. She may have a drought by springtime that can only be filled by illegal money.

23 posted on 10/20/2007 4:14:47 AM PDT by Revolutionary ("I love it when a plan comes together.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nat Turner

She’s beatable.


24 posted on 10/20/2007 4:22:38 AM PDT by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
We have to fight back with all we've got, but I see nothing--nothing--that tells me she's going to lose.

The fight continues until the last man.....was that you running from the foxhole on the first volley.....?

25 posted on 10/20/2007 4:43:57 AM PDT by cbkaty (I may not always post...but I am always here......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

The more she talks. The more she promises. The more to hang her with. We’ve got plenty of time...


26 posted on 10/20/2007 4:51:43 AM PDT by CTSeditor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Nat Turner

I don’t know, but the 45 to 52% who say they would NEVER vote for the beast think she is beatable.


27 posted on 10/20/2007 4:51:59 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatives live in the truth. Liberals live in lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nat Turner

My Bush-hating, atheist, limosine socialist, public school teacher sister and her know-it-all, Bush-hating, atheist, public school teacher daughter both say they won’t vote for Hillary.

To me that says she is beatable, barring overwhelming fraud.


28 posted on 10/20/2007 5:02:32 AM PDT by Wage Slave (Good fences make good neighbors. -- Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nat Turner

My liberal and moderate friends have said they will never vote for hillary. The rat convention next summer will show Americans just what is supporting hillary. It will be a major turn-off to most voters.


29 posted on 10/20/2007 5:13:49 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Tofu burgers are the last gasp of a dying society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nat Turner
I am surprised that nobody is harping on the statement that she made that she would not authorized torture in the hypothetical situation if we had a terrorist in captivity who knew where a nuclear bomb was that was going to go off in a couple of days. She would sacrifice the lives of thousands of American citizens just to spare the comfort of a terrorist. Unbelievable.
30 posted on 10/20/2007 5:21:33 AM PDT by hodaka (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nat Turner; All; Darkwolf377

‘She Who Shall Not Be Named’ is utterly unelectable as president. There is literally no scenario in which this shrew can win the presidency. The electoral college prohibits it. There is simply zero chance of gaining the 270 electoral votes required. Go ahead. Count up the states where she has even a tiny chance of winning and see if it adds up to 270. It won’t.

It should also be noted that she won the senate seat in New York only because there was no credible opposition, given that Rooty dropped out. If Rooty had stayed in the race, he would have cleaned her clock. And if those two meet in the General Election, the same thing will happen. (I’m not a Rooty supporter; this is just my ‘Worst Case Scenario’ for 2008.)

She’ll never be president. Never.

P.S. Note to Darkwolf: Nice tag line. That must save you a lot of time debating with people that present you the facts of a matter, Eh? LOL!


31 posted on 10/20/2007 5:30:57 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I predict the biggest GOP Presidential landslide in history.

It's only if the American people care one twit about their lives and their way of life that they will vote for a RAT. These RATS are doing everything they can to protect and encourage terrorists. Surely, at least half the American people are smart enough to see that.

If the American people love paying extremely high prices for energy, they'll vote RAT because it's the RATS who are preventing us from producing and refining our own oil and also built nuke plants. Yea, right. I WANT to pay more for energy.

The American people must want to pay higher taxes and have the economy go into the tank with resulting unemployment. How about the destruction of the the health care system? Sure, let's have Hillarycare.

Any one of the RATS will completely open the borders. They want all the illegals they can get. They get them for votes.

This isn't rocket science. The only ones voting for RATS should be those who believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy.

32 posted on 10/20/2007 5:31:04 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma (Democrats--Al Qaeda's best friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
When Americans walk into their polling places in November 2008 - - when it is time to cast their votes for real - - they will not be able to vote for Hillary Clinton.

The popular vote is meaningless in Presidential elections......unless you are Al Gore, of course!

33 posted on 10/20/2007 5:36:33 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Thinking of voting Democrat? Wake up and smell the Socialism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
So, what would that make Clintbilly? The first “laddie”?

So says the former President himself!

Sorry about the triple posting, but I received no feedback at the time that the posting was successful, so I tried again and again. I was surprised to see three posts! I was thinking that maybe the thread had been pulled.

34 posted on 10/20/2007 5:37:26 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Americans don't believe the Republican talk about "fiscal responsibility" when they see them spending like any dem.

Oh, please. There isn't a voter with two brain cells that actually believe that RATS are more "fiscally responsible" than Republicans. The idea is ridiculous.

35 posted on 10/20/2007 5:37:58 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma (Democrats--Al Qaeda's best friends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nat Turner
Rush's comments on Mrs. Clinton in his H&C interview were very encouraging:



Video & Transcript: Rush Limbaugh on Hannity & Colmes



"Sista-in-Chief" Hillary Changes Positions Hour-to-Hour, Day-to-Day
36 posted on 10/20/2007 5:46:45 AM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nat Turner
IS HILLARY BEATABLE?

If the gaggle of limousine liberals and the great unwashed, tatooed, pierced body of 'Americans' would bother to take a look at this bloated candidate who never bought a meal or groceries in her life, YES.

Just count the dead bodies.

Look at poor Vince.

Interview Craig Livingstone.

Check out what group bought the Worthen Bank in Little Rock.

Revisit the 'Bimbo Eruptions.'

Revisit the contempt she displayed to White House workers by demanding that they never make eye contact with her when passing her in hallways.

Count the bodies she and Bubba have left in their wake enroute to the White House.

Remember Kosovo.

Recall and replay her black-face dialect in a black church. ("I ain't noways taahrd.")

Look at Clinton's cabinet. Want a repeat?

Look at Clinton campaign finance scandals in the past.

Read her speech given as a student at Wellesley.

Look at the people she says she admires---all socialists or outright communists.

Remember her hatred of the military.

Remember how she came to be named after Sir Hilary.

Remember her strident, screeching voice.

And, of course, it goes on and on. Now. If you want the two Clintons in the White House, ruling your lives with the abetment of the liberal pansies in Congress, pull the lever and put this lumpy bag of human debris in the oval oriface. Then prepare to surrender your standard of living and continued enjoyment of all the goodies manufactured for us by the Chinese who use the profits to build weapons aimed at America.

She's a traitorous, treacherous, evil -itch who will say or do anything to get elected.

37 posted on 10/20/2007 6:01:36 AM PDT by fweingart (Tom Tancredo Will Get The Job Done! (How is Mumia Abu-Jamal these days?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fweingart

Great posting and keep it coming. Thanks.


38 posted on 10/20/2007 6:21:18 AM PDT by jws3sticks (Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Nat Turner

Yes, if the GOP suddenly develops the gonads to take the fight straight to her and expose her for what she is. So far, the GOP leaders have been gutless wonders when dealing with her.


39 posted on 10/20/2007 6:25:32 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nat Turner

She is not beatable. Mark my words.


40 posted on 10/20/2007 6:26:53 AM PDT by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson