Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dr. Albert Mohler On The Significance Of Bob Jones III's Endorsement Of Mitt Romney
Townhall.com ^ | 10/18/07 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 10/20/2007 5:10:36 PM PDT by Reaganesque

HH: Joined now by the president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, my colleague on the Salem Radio Network airwaves, and on their editorial board, Dr. Albert Mohler. Al, good to have you back, thanks for joining us. 

AM: Hugh, it’s always great to be with you.  

HH: Your reaction, Al, to the announcement yesterday first of Dean Robert Taylor of Bob Jones University, and then to Chancellor of Bob Jones University, Bob Jones III’s endorsement of Mitt Romney. Were you surprised? 

AM: Well, I was surprised only perhaps in the timing, but in all, no, I’m really not surprised. I think this is what happens in a political context when the options get reduced. And I think especially the statement made by Bob Jones III is very clear. He saw his options reduced to one candidate who he really thought had an opportunity to further his social and cultural and moral concerns. And he was pretty up front about that. 

HH: Do you expect that this is the first couple of stones that are going to roll down an Evangelical hill? Or is this an isolated group of activists in South Carolina who have been particularly wooed by Mitt Romney? 

AM: Well, you know, the interesting thing is it’s very difficult to call South Carolina or Bob Jones University atypical in this. And you just think back to previous Republican nomination struggles, and you can remember how decisive some of these constituencies can be. I think this is really big. If I were in the Romney campaign, I would be extremely encouraged by this, because not only is Bob Jones III obviously a very well known conservative leader, but he is so well positioned on the spectrum, that this is likely to make it easier for other persons also to make very similar moves.  

HH: And do you expect any of those to follow shortly? Have you heard of any in the offing? 

AM: Well, I know that there’s a lot of conversation going on. As you know, Hugh, there’s just a lot of people right now concerned about exactly how the race might shape up, concerned about timing, and concerned about what might happen between now and when anyone actually gets the opportunity to vote.  

HH: Now do you think that this effectively dissipates the Mormon issue that there’s been so much conversation about? You and I have talked about it in the past, and I interviewed you for the book, et cetera, but does this put that one to bed? 

AM: You know, I don’t think it puts it to bed. I think it, though, gets it into some pajamas, perhaps. Let’s put it that way.


HH: (laughing) 

AM: It’s moving it in that direction, because I think what’s taking place is that Evangelicals are having to rethink a lot of this whole political question. It’s been easy in recent election cycles. Evangelicals have basically known here is someone who looks like us, sounds like us, believes like us, goes to Church like us, who on the issues, is right where we want him. And so we’re going to be very clearly aligned behind this one candidate. We’ve had to grow up as an Evangelical movement. And one of the big questions we’ve been having to ask is what exactly do we expect from a candidate, and does that mean that we can’t vote for a candidate who in some life particular, and something as particular as worldview and religious commitment, is in a different place than we are, but will further the goals and protect the gains on moral and cultural issues that are central Evangelical concerns. I think that’s been a maturation process.  I think we’re seeing it before our eyes. 

HH: I’m talking with Dr. Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, one of the leading intellectual lights in the Protestant Church in America. Dr. Mohler, can you explain to the audience Bob Jones, and what that university is, and who Bob Jones III is in terms of the spectrum of American theological options? 

AM: Yeah, if you talk about American Evangelicalism, or conservative Protestantism in America, you would certainly look at something like Bob Jones as, institutionally speaking, the far right bookend. And you’re talking about an institution…the motto of the university is The World’s Most Unusual University. It’s an incredible thing to see. It’s a massive educational complex, started by an Evangelist by the name of Bob Jones, then led by his son and his grandson, and now by his great-grandson. This is the grandson, Bob Jones III, pretty well known in the media. But to say the name Bob Jones and American conservative Protestantism is to speak of the brand of the reputation that is clearly understood to speak for independent fundamentalism, and without compromise or without fear.  

HH: And how big are the numbers of independent fundamentalists in the country, Al Mohler? 

AM: Well, I think in a state, first of all, like South Carolina, you’re talking about an extremely large portion, perhaps even a decisive percentage of the population, decisive in the sense that if they did not vote for a Republican candidate, that candidate can’t win. Nationwide, you’re talking about a considerable percentage of the population. But the other thing is, again, that what this really does politically is that it puts Bob Jones in the position of making it a lot easier for people in other Evangelical circles to make similar moves.  

HH: And last question, Al Mohler, in the South Carolina primary, does Bob Jones III’s endorsement travel well? 

AM: Well in the South Carolina primary, not only does it travel well, this is a huge signal. This is like a lighthouse going on, the light shining its beam on Mitt Romney. Not only that, but the argument made by Bob Jones III basically means that not only is he supporting Mitt Romney,  he’s basically saying he is the only option so far as he sees it on the Republican side.   



TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008endorsements; bobjones; christianvote; elections; endorsement; endorsements; hewitt; jones; mohler; romney; talkradio; transcript
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
This is actually the transcript of the interview Hugh had with Dr. Mohler on his show. Very interesting comments.
1 posted on 10/20/2007 5:10:38 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: asparagus; Austin1; bcbuster; bethtopaz; BlueAngel; Bluestateredman; borntoraisehogs; Bosco; ...
Mitt Ping!


• Send FReep Mail to Unmarked Package to get [ON] or [OFF] the Mitt Romney Ping List


2 posted on 10/20/2007 5:12:14 PM PDT by Reaganesque (Romney for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
I am an extremely conservative So. Baptist. Bob Jones is an extremist. I can’t figure out what is going on with them. They condemned Billy Graham because he is a Baptist and his wife was Presbyterian.
3 posted on 10/20/2007 5:17:07 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek

Bob Jones types make my skin crawl.


4 posted on 10/20/2007 5:24:01 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; Frumanchu; Dr. Eckleburg; Gamecock

Ping!


5 posted on 10/20/2007 5:24:32 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Therefore the prudent keep silent at that time, for it is an evil time." - Amos 5:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque; Rameumptom; Grig; sandude; Saundra Duffy; Utah Girl; Spiff; tantiboh; 2pugs4me; ...

Yippy

The day dawn is breaking, the world is awaking,
The clouds of night’s darkness are fleeing away.
The worldwide commotion, from ocean to ocean,
Now heralds the time of the beautiful day.


6 posted on 10/20/2007 5:31:09 PM PDT by restornu (No one is perfect but you can always strive to do the right thing! PRESS FOWARD MITT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I would say that perhaps you shouldn’t overestimate the importance of Bob Jones III endorsement of Mitt Romney.

Protestants are very very dogmatic, Mr. Jones can say what he will, it doesn’t neccessarily mean votes at the polls in large numbers.

When Mitt gives a speech at Bob Jones this Jan or Dec, that will be the “true” test, GWB gave one and he caught flack for it, but he also won SC.

McCain insulted Bob Jones U, and he lost in SC.


7 posted on 10/20/2007 5:34:29 PM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile/ No more miller brewing products, pass it on....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Frumanchu; Dr. Eckleburg; Gamecock

I wonder if there’s even a candidate worth supporting. My wife and I are going to vote Republican because we would NEVER consider voting for the homosexual/abortion/illegal immigrant/higher tax crowd. But, frankly, it’s getting hard to tell the two parties apart. We’ll just hold our nose when we cast our ballet. The day may come when it simply isn’t worth bothering to go to the poll.


8 posted on 10/20/2007 5:40:30 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
what this really does politically is that it puts Bob Jones in the position of making it a lot easier for people in other Evangelical circles to make similar moves.

No -- what this really does is make it easier for many of those in the Christian community to scratch Dr Mohler and Bob Jones III off their list of credible leaders.

9 posted on 10/20/2007 5:43:38 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: HarleyD

Don’t give up - and never stay away from the polls.

Just remember — a “non” vote is a vote “for” the Liberal Democrats - probably Hillary.


11 posted on 10/20/2007 5:58:35 PM PDT by bethtopaz (Liberals don't lie--- they just forget where they buried the dismembered remains of the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JMack
According to some Mitt supporters you are spouting propaganda for Planned Parenthood and you shouldn't do that on FR.

Yes you read that correctly.

12 posted on 10/20/2007 6:25:13 PM PDT by JRochelle (Rudy voted for McGovern in '72. Romney voted for Tsongas in '92.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: padre35
I would say that perhaps you shouldn’t overestimate the importance of Bob Jones III endorsement of Mitt Romney. Protestants are very very dogmatic, Mr. Jones can say what he will, it doesn’t neccessarily mean votes at the polls in large numbers.

Actually, Protestants haven't been very dogmatic in the last century. But independent fundamentalists (and Baptists and some evangelicals) continue to uphold doctrinal purity and enter the public arena with the same values they have in their churches. It is a very tempered kind of religious influence though, not some kind of American Taliban movement that the media likes to portray when a presidential candidate visits the Bob Jones university complex.

When Mitt gives a speech at Bob Jones this Jan or Dec, that will be the “true” test, GWB gave one and he caught flack for it, but he also won SC. McCain insulted Bob Jones U, and he lost in SC.

A very astute political observation. Mitt must comMitt. That means, at a minimum, not being afraid to be seen with us and campaign for these votes in particular. The other most controversial campaign stop is at VMI (Virginia Military Institute). I wouldn't be surprised to see Romney at VMI before the primaries as well as at BJU.
13 posted on 10/20/2007 6:32:12 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

That’s an ironic photo to post for a Mitt ping list, given that he denounced Reagan and has even bragged about being an Independent during “Reagan-Bush.”

The more I learn about him, the less I like him. He had been my second choice of the top tier, but I can’t really say that anymore.


14 posted on 10/20/2007 6:40:28 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

He is a flip-flopper period!.End of story.


15 posted on 10/20/2007 7:03:47 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

..Bob Jones endorses Romney—un-flippin-believable


16 posted on 10/20/2007 7:20:26 PM PDT by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner
Maybe Jones knows a lot more than you do about conservative politics. Just a thought.

Notice Mohler's mention of the timing and how the race might shape up. My reading is that Mohler was indicating that Fred might pick up his numbers and fundraising considerably, making him the better pick for the Religious Right since he doesn't have some of Mitt's baggage (MA AWB, some past statements that aren't so pleasing to Christians, etc.).

Mohler was indicating that it was a little early for Jones and others to commit to Mitt, that it might have been wiser to wait a month to see how Fred's numbers, campaign and fundraising is doing. Of course, that's the Baptist spin on this (same opinion I've had as a Baptist). But the indie fundies and conservative evangelicals seem ready to place their bets now. It seems a little early to me but they may simply recognize that if they're to place any sort of decisive support behind a candidate, they need to play kingmaker now and that Romney's Mormonism may take some extra effort to sell to their circle of influence.
17 posted on 10/20/2007 7:32:34 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Apres moi, le deluge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Maybe Jones knows a lot more than you do about conservative politics

..maybe he doesn't--there is a lot more than politics at stake here

Jones, and whoever else comes out in future days apparently aren't able to use YouTube--they need to do their homework on this man

And I don't require any Baptist explanation on anything, thanks...

18 posted on 10/20/2007 7:55:56 PM PDT by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

I’ll call. What did Dr. Mohler say that you don’t find credible? Or are you just sharing your ignorance with us?


19 posted on 10/20/2007 8:00:33 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

Did Romney accept Dr. Bob’s endorsement? I believe that
George W. Romney would not have accepted such an endorsement from the grandfather Jones in 1967. I’m just not much on a Romney or any other MI politicians of the past half century, including one in the White House from 1974-77.


20 posted on 10/20/2007 8:08:21 PM PDT by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson