Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Poll to FREEP) Is the statewide smoking ban good or bad for Illinois?
State Journal Register ^ | December 30, 2007 | the eagle has landed

Posted on 12/30/2007 5:31:07 AM PST by TheEaglehasLanded

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last
To: Pontiac

You beat me to it. Isn’t Illinois state law basically the following: “Blah, blah blah...except Cook County...” or vice versa, etc?


41 posted on 12/30/2007 6:28:47 AM PST by xc1427 (It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees...Midnight Oil (Power and the Passion))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: buffyt

I hate Illinois Nazis
42 posted on 12/30/2007 6:30:03 AM PST by Entrepreneur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Entrepreneur

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.


43 posted on 12/30/2007 6:31:34 AM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded
It’s pretty pathetic that hubby and I have to go to Vegas where he can enjoy a cigar with his adult beverage. Pathethic!
44 posted on 12/30/2007 6:37:07 AM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Entrepreneur

Why not keep smoking at home where it belongs and we wouldn’t need people asking for these laws. I think everyone can see what a grip smoking has on people, even to the extent of twisting the argument into how someone smells or them being a nazi beacause they don’t agree with there point. And its not a total prohibition by the way. I’ll say it again, I don’t like government passing laws to do this and if people would act responsible we would avoid this situation. Smoke at home all you want or a distance away from others. Heck lite the whole pack up at once I don’t care as long as I don’t have to breath it. My argument is for smokers to be responsible for there actions. Smokers have brought this on themselves.


45 posted on 12/30/2007 6:37:09 AM PST by Racer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Racer1

Like I said above, it’s pretty pathetic that hubby and I have to go to Vegas where he can enjoy a cigar with his adult beverage WITH OTHER ADULTS DOING THE SAME — it’s called socialization. Hubby has an extremely stressful job of keeping the rapid transit running for the Cleveland area. He puts in many hours as well. He only smokes about 6 cigars per year, but just to be able to do it is a treat. And, for all his work and the stress and hours involved, the people tell him that he cannot enjoy a cigar in public with other like-minded adults. Think about it.


46 posted on 12/30/2007 6:43:59 AM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
I still believe individual liberty sells, but so few in the media or politics are selling it. What we need are leaders who can properly articulate property rights.

There are a couple who still believe in freedom and the American people.

"I'd like to see a country where the day I walk out of the White House, after a couple of terms, the American people are more independent of government than the day that I walked in."
Congressman Duncan Hunter, 2008 presidential candidate

47 posted on 12/30/2007 6:47:09 AM PST by Just A Nobody (PISSANT for President '08 - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody

Outstanding words by Ducan Hunter. Hear! Hear!


48 posted on 12/30/2007 6:48:15 AM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady; buffyt
Kind of reminds you of a certain group of Germans, doesn’t it?
Yes the NAZIs are alive and well in USA. Sad.

A resounding Yes! to both your comments.

Smoke Nazi pic

49 posted on 12/30/2007 6:50:18 AM PST by Just A Nobody (PISSANT for President '08 - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Outstanding words by Ducan Hunter.

Yes they are! He is simply THE BEST!!!

50 posted on 12/30/2007 6:53:08 AM PST by Just A Nobody (PISSANT for President '08 - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Racer1
"Sorry, I'm tired of smelling coworkers smoke just because they don't care about anyone else but there nasty habit."

This is an issue you should take up with the property owner instead of whining like a baby for the nanny state to come to your rescue.

51 posted on 12/30/2007 6:54:09 AM PST by Mark was here (Hard work never killed anyone, but why take the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody
Yes, an “independent” government like Duncan Hunter stated. This issue should not have been handled by the government. Citizens could have worked it out amongst themselves by allowing establishments to decide for themselves. If an establishment wanted no smoking, all they had to do was to remove the ashtrays. There is no need for a sign with a phone number for reporting your fellow citizen to the state. RIDICULOUS and SHAMEFUL.
52 posted on 12/30/2007 6:55:59 AM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

Property Owners Should Decide

http://www.smokinglobby.com/forum/images/avatars/72733664846111b3ad3840.gif


53 posted on 12/30/2007 7:02:32 AM PST by libertarian27 (Land of the Fee, Home of the Shamed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

54 posted on 12/30/2007 7:03:52 AM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Citizens could have worked it out amongst themselves by allowing establishments to decide for themselves.

15-17 years ago businesses began doing just that. Suddenly, when you went into a restaurant you were given a choice of smoking or non-smoking sections. Yin/Yang signs were posted on doors indicating the business provided an environment for all to enjoy. But that was not enough for the nanny's.

Then they mandated separate, walled off areas for smokers with outlandish air filtration systems. Many establishments spent thousands of dollars to comply with the new laws only to be told a few years later that it was not good enough and they must become smoke free.

I miss living in a free country!

55 posted on 12/30/2007 7:12:10 AM PST by Just A Nobody (PISSANT for President '08 - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody
I miss living in a free country!

So do I. Even Rush Limbaugh has said that this has got to stop. It seems that some so-called "conservatives" don't understand this, and are willing to allow giving away a bit of freedom for what they want. FREEDOM REQUIRES CONSISTENCY. I ran across a Freeper here in a smoking thread who was some type of official that regulated businesses. That person said they were proud to vote for smoking bans time and time again and would continue to do so. When I told him/her that with every law passed a little bit of freedom was taken away,he/she wanted me to "take it back." This is an official who affects our lives and who didn't want to acknowledge that.

56 posted on 12/30/2007 7:25:56 AM PST by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Racer1

“Why not keep smoking at home where it belongs”

Well, I don’t like the smell of perfume, so let’s make a law banning perfume in public places and KEEP PERFUME AT HOME WHERE IT BELONGS!.

And believe me, I’ve seen people who are very unreasonable when it comes to ANY SMELL that bothers them. Whether it be smoke, perfume or even some cooking odors.

If you don’t like smoke then it’s very simple.

AVOID BEING AROUND SMOKERS.

YOUR RIGHT to not smell smoke doesn’t outweigh THEIR RIGHT to smoke where ever they choose or are ‘allowed’ in the case of the nanny government.

If it’s not smoking, it’s going to be something else someone doesn’t like and wants banned.

And you may be right about smoking ‘killing’ people.

But it’s the SMOKERS that are dying, NOT people breathing second hand smoke.

You couldn’t get enough tar in your lungs from someone else’s cigarette smoke unless you were in a room with no windows and doors 24 hours a day.

The ‘second hand smoke kills’ argument is a specious one and totally unproven.

Even the WHO (World Health Organization) said just the opposite.

One of the ‘emergency’ remedies for people with asthma is to give them one or two drags on a cigarette.

Seems foolish doesn’t it?

Why would that work? Because cigarettes contain NICOTINE which is a drug that opens the pores in your lungs and allows you to breath better.

The problem with smokers, and why eventually they may have lung problems is because of the TAR in the cigarettes and the HEAT generated.

Tar will build up over time and will ‘plug’ the pores in your lungs and damage the bacilli (little hairs) and can cause scarring of the lung tissue.

The effect is reversible by quitting smoking. Over time your lungs will heal themselves provided you have not let the condition go beyond the point of no return.

In most cases, healing will happen within a year of quitting.

Since you are not smoking but merely breathing second hand smoke for a relatively short time, your lungs will not even know the difference.

I sense your argument is not the ‘effects’ on second hand smoke but the ‘annoyance’ that you feel by smelling it.

There are a lot of annoying habits people have, but to say they must ‘keep it at home where it belongs’ is nothing more than selfishness and a ‘my rights are more important than your rights’ statement.

All I can say is.

GET OVER YOURSELF.


57 posted on 12/30/2007 7:29:19 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded
Yeee Hawww... Freeped for GOOD...

Good is winning...

Errr.. That IS what you wanted us to freep isn't it???

58 posted on 12/30/2007 7:39:58 AM PST by Mogger (Independence, better fuel economy and performance with American made synthetic oil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mogger

“Errr.. That IS what you wanted us to freep isn’t it???”

Ummmmmmm.....no..

Government interference = bad

No Government interference = good.

But in this case, the ‘good’ and ‘bad’ are reversed in the poll.


59 posted on 12/30/2007 7:48:45 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
I ran across a Freeper here in a smoking thread who was some type of official that regulated businesses. That person said they were proud to vote for smoking bans time and time again and would continue to do so.

Sometimes I have to check and make sure I am still on FreeRepublic. Watching/listening to people turn themselves inside out to defend something that should never have been an issue is very discouraging.

I am beginning to lean toward banning all tobacco products and get it over with. Make it all illegal, as well as all alcohol and any other activity we may enjoy. Let's take the plunge into full blown fascism and get on with our lives.



Do I sound too cynical? ;*)

60 posted on 12/30/2007 7:59:23 AM PST by Just A Nobody (PISSANT for President '08 - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson