Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The GOP needs a brokered convention in 2008
vanity | January 22, 2008 | neverdem

Posted on 01/22/2008 8:38:59 PM PST by neverdem

Free Republic Opinion Poll: (1/22) With FRed dropping out, who do you now support for the Republican nomination?

I just lost my reason for changing my registration from Conservative to the GOP in New York. My pick in that poll was none of the above. Slightly more than half on this forum prefers Romney as I write this.

I don't know why Fred didn't get more support, but when he got a little more than half of the support of Mike Huckabee in the South Carolina, that told Fred something. Huckabee was his main rival for the social conservative vote. I don't know what those folks in South Carolina were thinking when they voted for Huckabee, but a candidate who proposes to ban tobacco smoking and who criticizes the present administration for being too bellicose is not credible, IMHO, not to mention his otherwise populist politics.

When it comes to the general election, I'll most likely support the GOP's nominee, but if it is Romney, I won't be surprised if a lot of the "base" stays home. Some will stay home because of his religion. That's probably the worst reason not to vote for him, IMHO. Debra J. Saunders wrote today in the San Francisco Chronicle: "But don't tell me Romney is the true conservative in the race. His record reveals a solid conservative - when it has been in his interest to be one." Suffice it to say, the author barely starts to criticize Romney for all of the changes in his political positions over various social issues over the years. Should Romney win the nomination and in November, I expect as many disappointments as the current occupant of the White House.

I don't have to mention the other RINOs that are left in more ways than one. How did we get to this point where we are left with such a bunch of dismal RINOs? I don't know. The drive by media didn't help. But that is beside the point. The point is what do we do now. I say vote in the remaining primaries in a way so that we get a brokered convention. Considering what we are left with now, how could we do any worse?

Some might fear a brokered convention. I fear muddling along with any of these RINOs. David Freddoso wrote last month in National Review Online: "A brokered convention would allow for an airing of grievances for a party that has to decide its direction after a major loss." November 2006 was such a loss. Conservatives and small 'l' libertarians have just had another loss in this GOP primary season. A brokered convention could result in having a nominee we want to vote for, as opposed to voting against whoever the donkey is, after they have a nasty primary battle, or Bloomberg who's shaping up as the serious third party nominee. The left are eating their own. Fierce fighting over the minority vote may be the real surprise of the '08 Democratic race, with many blacks gravitating to Sen. Barack Obama and Hispanics to Sen. Hillary Clinton.

The new poll found 77 percent of the adults surveyed opposed making driver's licenses available to illegal aliens, while just 16 percent supported the idea.

Licenses fared poorly across party lines, including near-blanket opposition among self-identified Republicans, at 88 percent. Among independents and Democrats, it was still overwhelmingly unpopular, drawing 75 percent and 68 percent opposition, respectively.

A brokered convention could take advantage of another fracture in the donkeys and appeal to a great many folks sick of endless illegal immigration while our entitlement and social programs are undermining our finances. Another third party effort from the right, e.g. Constitution Party, would be courting disaster even if Bloomberg draws votes only from the left and center, IMHO.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008election; 2008rncconvention; election2008; gop2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last
To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


101 posted on 01/23/2008 9:43:27 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Grampa Dave; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...

I love it when you rant. ;’) In November I’ll vote for the eventual Pubbie nominee. Also, I agree wholeheartedly with these words of FR’s own Grampa Dave:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1955546/posts?page=103#103

“...The purists, who will stay at home because our candidate couldn’t walk on water without getting the soles of his Teva’s wet will have gifted us with another Clintoon pillaging.”


102 posted on 01/23/2008 9:45:17 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__________________Profile updated Wednesday, January 16, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #103 Removed by Moderator

Comment #104 Removed by Moderator

To: neverdem
It’s a lose, lose situation. None of the contenders are acceptable. A brokered convention runs the risk of a nominee that hasn’t been sufficiently vetted through the primaries and nasty surprises show up too late costing the election.
105 posted on 01/23/2008 10:58:37 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

If it’s Romney, Giuliani or Huckabee, I expect to vote Republican in November. If it’s McCain or Paul, I’m staying home or looking for a third party candidate. I’d rather be screwed by the enemy than by someone claiming to be a friend.


106 posted on 01/24/2008 4:33:39 AM PST by Berosus (Support our troops, bring them home -- from Bosnia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I think you wrote a very thoughtful post, neverdem. You’re not the only one that feels this way.


107 posted on 01/24/2008 4:41:45 AM PST by Convert from ECUSA (A voter wavering between wanting radical change and burning the damn place down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; SunkenCiv; Grampa Dave; All

Good rant, neverdem. It’s not often that you rant. Great thread. I agree with SunkenCiv, GrampaDave and other like-minded posters.

Romney was my 3rd choice after Hunter and Thompson (Hunter in the Michigan primary, my wife voted Romney...she also likes Guliani).

Thanks to all posters.


108 posted on 01/24/2008 6:23:45 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: JMack
If the NRA ...

The NRA gave Romney a B+ for his gun-related leadership.

The NRA ENDORSED Mitt Romney, if I'm not mistaken.

So please, it does no one any good to hype up hatred for the man who will likely be the GOP nominee.

Romney held (holds) basically the same position as a large percentage of gun-loving Republicans, including me.

Which is that no one will EVER "grab" or take away anyone's guns.

Romney has constantly said we all have a Constitutional God-given right to own guns, as many as we feel we need.

But many feel the new high-tech weapons, pulse weapons, the centrifical bullet-spray weapons, and the like -- might have a need for some caution.

But that doesn't mean he's a gun grabber.

109 posted on 01/24/2008 6:57:47 AM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: JMack
Romney is going to .....

Romney is going to get the support and endorsement of almost every conservative leader, talk show host, or Republican politician in the nation.

As we speak, Laura Ingraham is pumping up .... supporting .... endorsing.... whatever you want to call it -- Mitt Romney.

Add her name to today's endorsement by Dana Rorerbacher, of California, and several other prominent Republican conservative leaders.

Also, Romney got the endorsement of the NRA in ? 2002 or 2004.

His position on guns is basically the same as the bulk of other conservative Republicans.

110 posted on 01/24/2008 7:07:03 AM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: PGalt; neverdem; SunkenCiv; george76

Hopefully, we might see a Romney/Thompson slate.

Regardless, I will vote for Mitt.

I don’t understand why some of us swoon over a candidate’s list of conservatism when that candidate can’t fire up voters and financial support. A lot of us could have a great list of conservatism and would be lucky if our family members and a few friends voted for us. We need candidates who fire up a lot of voters and financial backers to win elections. Why participate in elections if you don’t want to win and want the other party to win to teach the rest of us a lesson.

Too many of us latch onto a good guy, who couldn’t win an election for dog catcher because of his conservative dream list. Then, we stab other Republicans in the back because our dream boy was just that, a dream.


111 posted on 01/24/2008 7:15:47 AM PST by Grampa Dave ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; PGalt; Berosus

Thanks all. I do think Romney will be on the ticket, VP if not P. We are at the tipping point; a return to rule by the Dhimmicrats in the WH and all of Congress — and thus packing of the SCOTUS and federal courts — will be a one way trip, and future elections will be EINO. We are not going to get everything we want, that’s called life, and everyone needs to understand that, otherwise we’re just another whiny entitlement class.


112 posted on 01/24/2008 10:09:28 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__________________Profile updated Wednesday, January 16, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

Comment #113 Removed by Moderator

To: JMack

A centrifugal bullet-spray type gun is the latest technology, and is still in the testing phase. (SEE BELOW) — from a defense review website ....

“Highest RPM weapon is the DREAD system, an electro-centrifugal powderless weapon system. It has no recoil, no gas blowback, no reload in the traditional sense, and so it is capable of firing up to 120,000 rounds per minute from a single barrel.No other weapon system can top the accuracy, rate of fire, or reliability.

It delivers .50 cal spherical projectiles less than 1/3 inch apart, at distances comparable to sniper rifles, with identical accuracy. Custom munitions planned for the system.

DREAD TALON SWORD and you’ll probably find a link to defense review somewhere.”


114 posted on 01/25/2008 5:41:15 AM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

May I suggest a duel?


115 posted on 01/25/2008 5:42:21 AM PST by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #116 Removed by Moderator

To: neverdem

I’m with you. We need a brokered convention. That would set this entire nation back on it’s heels and be worth about 5 percentage points in the General Election.


117 posted on 01/25/2008 10:48:25 PM PST by no dems (If we can't beat Hillary or Obama in '08, the GOP has become a sorry lot..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JMack
Of course with Mitt

Romney certainly made some PC statements in 1994, and perhaps some in 2002.

He was constantly hounded 24/7 by 'gotcha' uber-lib journalists, and surrounded by voters from the Kennedy wing of the Democratic party.

Heck, I'd be embarrassed to have all the statements I made over the past 15 years thrown back in my face, man of them out of context to boot. Wouldn't you?

As for the assault weapons thing, didn't the NRA 'sign off' on that legislation. Didn't the NRA donate to his campaign.

Lastly... I own several very powerful guns. I am not worried one way or the other about the 'assault weapons ban'.

In fact there are many good decent and very conservative Republicans across the country who support that assault weapons ban, because they know citizens are still able to arm and protect themselves to the hilt with a wide variety of very lethal guns, if the need be.

118 posted on 01/26/2008 4:41:16 AM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: dschapin
"If Thompson wanted our votes he could have at least pretended to like us."

Damn! And all these many years I thought the election was about US liking the candidate!

But then again, bill clinton did "feel our pain", didn't he...so he must've cared. *wink*wink*
119 posted on 01/26/2008 5:06:38 AM PST by FrankR (Historical Moment: "2008 elections held with no conservatives running...film at 11")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
Pick the better of those two and stand by your man. One of them will be the nominee.

Jolly, a choice between a gun with a hot temper who doesn't understand "Congress shall make no law", and a second, whose paste actions, despite his current protestations, indicate he doesn't understand "shall not be infringed". Of course the Donkey candidate will be on the wrong side of both those issues, and generally willfully ignorant of the rest of the Constitution as well.

I doubt that whatever came out of a brokered convention would be any worse, but it's likely to be one of them anyway.

BOHICA


120 posted on 01/27/2008 1:39:41 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson