Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cort Wrotnowski's stay request denied by SCOTUS
Supreme Court ^ | 12/15/2008

Posted on 12/15/2008 7:29:47 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan

The orders list for 12/15/2008 shows Wrotnowski's request for stay as denied.


TOPICS: US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: 0bama; birthcertificate; certifigate; constitution; lawsuit; obama; obamatruthfile; scotus; wrotnowski
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2008 7:29:47 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

If he were white, would that have happened?


2 posted on 12/15/2008 7:30:42 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Sadly not surprised...the fix is in.


3 posted on 12/15/2008 7:31:58 AM PST by Constitution Day (Big Brotha Is Watching You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Thanks for posting.


4 posted on 12/15/2008 7:32:40 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Alan Keyes certainly has standing - they should recognize his claim.


5 posted on 12/15/2008 7:33:40 AM PST by MarkT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Digusting. I guess SCOTUS prefers tyranny. I thought Robrts, Scalia, Alito and Thmas cared more about the Republic - I guess they could not be bothered.

Soro’s son had an editorial in today’s Wall Street Journal (now a rag paper) on why the Electorial College needs to be scrapped. He said NJ, IL, MD and HI are already there.


6 posted on 12/15/2008 7:35:43 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

The constitution is null and void and none of us are bound by it.


7 posted on 12/15/2008 7:36:01 AM PST by ichabod1 (Reagan wouldÂ’ve fired them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

No. 08A469
Title: Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant
v.
Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State

Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Case Nos.: (SC 18264)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 26 2008 Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A469) referred to the Court by Justice Scalia.
Dec 9 2008 Supplemental brief of applicant Cort Wrotnowski filed. (Distributed)


WHERE DOES IT SAY DENIED????


8 posted on 12/15/2008 7:36:15 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

08A469 WROTNOWSKI, CORT V. BYSIEWICZ, CT SEC. OF STATE
The application for stay and/or injunction addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court is denied.


9 posted on 12/15/2008 7:36:30 AM PST by ctdonath2 (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Welcome to


10 posted on 12/15/2008 7:36:49 AM PST by Old Sarge (For the first time in my life, I am ashamed to be an American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/121508zor.pdf
11 posted on 12/15/2008 7:37:34 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

The order was issued (see http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/121508zor.pdf ). Updating the docket takes a little longer.


12 posted on 12/15/2008 7:37:39 AM PST by ctdonath2 (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Not surprising, but disappointing nonetheless.


13 posted on 12/15/2008 7:37:56 AM PST by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ Pro-Palin & NObama Gear : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

ping...

Not surprising, but definitely disappointing.


14 posted on 12/15/2008 7:38:43 AM PST by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ Pro-Palin & NObama Gear : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
I wonder what is happening with the Berg case? The docket seems to show that it is still active:

No. 08-570	
Title: 	
Philip J. Berg, Petitioner
v.
Barack Obama, et al.
Docketed:	October 31, 2008
Lower Ct:	United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  Case Nos.:	(08-4340)
	Rule 11

~~~Date~~~ 	~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oct 30 2008 	Petition for a writ of certiorari before
judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2008)
Oct 31 2008 	Application (08A391) for an injunction
pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of
certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Nov 3 2008 	Supplemental brief of applicant Philip J.
Berg filed.
Nov 3 2008 	Application (08A391) denied by Justice
Souter.
Nov 18 2008 	Waiver of right of respondents Federal
Election Commission, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 1 2008 	Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed
by respondent Bill Anderson.
Dec 8 2008 	Application (08A505) for an injunction
pending the disposition of the petition for a writ of
certiorari, submitted to Justice Souter.
Dec 9 2008 	Application (08A505) denied by Justice
Souter.

15 posted on 12/15/2008 7:41:07 AM PST by snowsislander (NRA -- join today! 1-877-NRA-2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Boy, I’m sure glad Bush put those two solid Constitution-revering conservatives Roberts and Alito on the SCOTUS, aren’t you?

Oops.


16 posted on 12/15/2008 7:42:02 AM PST by mkjessup (43 prior Presidents did NOT spend six-figure sums to hide the details of their birth certificate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

Yes, I am the Constitution. When you name me ping me, please?


17 posted on 12/15/2008 7:42:09 AM PST by null and void (Hey 0bama? There will be a pop quiz every day for the next four years...miss a question, people die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

Certiorari not denied yet, so it’s still alive.


18 posted on 12/15/2008 7:42:38 AM PST by ctdonath2 (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Judicial tyranny ignores the Constitution. If they are unwilling to COMPEL OBAMA TO SHOW US HIS PAPERS, how will the constitutional process proceed from this point on?


19 posted on 12/15/2008 7:43:18 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

i knew this was going to happen...but i still had hope...unfortunately we can’t count on the SCOTUS doing us any favors...the whole Blago scandal could be promising and has definately tainted 0, but i think we all know that this joker is probably going to be inaugurated...but this is what i’ve been thinking lately...

the only reason i voted for McCain was because of Sarah Palin. if he would have been elected, it would have been disastrous—he would have been thier pawn either way...we wouldn’t have had a chance for atleast another 12 years probably. 0 is going to try and do some bad things to this country, but what is done can be undone.

my brother has a book on survival—the author’s first instruction is to banish ALL negative thoughts from your head or you’re toast...i know it’s hard to stay positive in times like these, but atleast we aren’t alone—we have eachother to stay sane and laugh every now and then—we may not see instant karma in this lifetime...but sometimes that’s the lesson...


20 posted on 12/15/2008 7:43:56 AM PST by MountainWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson